| Date |
Text |
| 2007-02-25 14:16:31 | *** UNSAT *** |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE: PLEASE CLARIFY WHERE THE AIC RATING FOR |
| | MAIN/SERVICE EQUIPMENT IS STATED ON PLANS. THIS USED TO |
| | BE ONE PLANS FROM PREVIOUS PROJECTS? |
| | 110.9 |
| | PLANS MAY NOT ONLY QUOTE THIS REQUIREMENT. |
| | |
| | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NOTE #1 ON RISER USED TO STATE THE |
| | CONDUIT FROM METER TO PANEL TO BE IN SLAB, HOWEVER THIS |
| | PART OF THE NOTE HAS BEEN REMOVED. THIS HAS BEEN |
| | REDLINED ON OTHER SETS OF PLANS WHEN PLANS WERE OK WITH |
| | OTHER COMMENTS. |
| | 230.70, 230.71 |
| | MUST BE IN SLAB OR MUST CONTAIN MAIN WITH OCP OUTSIDE. |
| | |
| | 3) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW THAT A MEETING WAS HELD PREVIOUSLY |
| | WITH DESIGN TEAM REPRESENTATIVES AND INFORMATION WAS |
| | GIVEN WITH RESPECT TO THE DIFFERENCES OF SD(SMOKE |
| | DETECTORS) AND SA(SMOKE ALARMS) AND REQUIRED CHANGES |
| | WHICH WILL NEEDED ON FUTURE PLANS, HOWEVER THIS |
| | DESIGNATION HAS NOT BEEN CHANGED ON PLANS. |
| | * |
| | PLEASE KNOW THAT A MEETING WAS HELD AT THE SOUTHERN |
| | SECTION MEETING IN OCT 06 WHERE WE WERE DIRECTLY |
| | INFORMED BY NFPA THAT THE USE OF SD FOR SMOKE DETECTORS |
| | ON PLANS FOR RESIDENTIAL HOMES IS NOT ACCEPTABLE WHEN |
| | THESE DEVICES ANY ACTUALLY FALL UNDER THE DEFINITIONS |
| | OF SMOKE ALARMS WHICH WOULD BE SHOWN AS SA/SMOKE |
| | ALARMS. |
| | THIS INFORMATION WAS NEW TO THIS AHJ AS THE GENERAL USE |
| | OF THE SD FOR SMOKE DETECTORS WAS ALWAYS ACCEPTED. |
| | BY THE DEFINITIONS AS STATED IN NFPA-72 A SD/ SMOKE |
| | DETECTOR IS ONLY A DEVICE WHICH WILL DETECT AND WILL |
| | NOT SOUND AN AUDIBLE ALARM. THIS WOULD BE DONE BY |
| | HORN/SIREN TYPE DEVICES. PLEASE SEE THE DEFINITIONS OF |
| | SA/SMOKE ALARMS; THESE ARE DEVICES WHICH ARE 120V (AS |
| | SHOWN) AND WOULD DETECT AND SOUND AN ALARM. THIS IS |
| | SOMETHING THAT IS NOW BEING COMMENTED ON OTHER REVIEWS |
| | FOR OTHER NEW HOMES. |
| | ** PLEASE SEE THAT SMOKE ALARMS ARE STATED IN THE FBC |
| | RESIDENTIAL CODE/ FBC AND IN NFPA-72. |
| | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS ON THIS COMMENT PLEASE DO |
| | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE*. |
| | |
| | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THAT THE FEES OWED PER PREVIOUS |
| | BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS HAS NOT BEEN PAID.THIS WAS |
| | GIVEN AND IS ATTACHED ONCE AGAIN. |
| | |
| | ** ** IMPORTANT** |
| | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE |
| | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE |
| | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED |
| | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED |
| | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW |
| | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. |
| | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED |
| | FOR REFERENCE. |
| | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND |
| | AVOID ANY DELAYS. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR |
| | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF |
| | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, |
| | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO |
| | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS |
| | REVIEWER. |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
