| Date |
Text |
| 2006-06-21 00:00:00 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | ****THIRD REVIEW (SECOND PERMIT |
| | REVIEW)**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| | FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS |
| | TO THE FBC2004 |
| | |
| | FROM PREVIOUS REVIEWS, NUMBERING |
| | REMAINING THE SAME. |
| | |
| | 1.)ADDRESSED.PLEASE KEEP THE NOC IN |
| | THE PACKAGE. |
| | |
| | 2.)ADDRESSED.PLEASE KEEP IMPACT FEE |
| | STAMPED PAGE AND RECEIPT IN THE PACKAGE. |
| | |
| | 3.-5.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 6.)THIRD REQUEST FOR THREE SETS OF |
| | PLANS.ONLY TWO SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | 7.)SIGN THE OWNER/AGENT LINE OF THE |
| | ENERGY CALCS, FBC13-103.1. |
| | |
| | (2ND REVIEW) THIS WAS SIGNED.HOWEVER, |
| | SEE OTHER |
| | CORRECTIONS REGARDING ENERGY CALCS.IF |
| | NEW ENERGY CALCS ARE PRODUCED PLEASE |
| | SIGN THE NEW CALCS.THREE COPIES ARE |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | (3RD REVIEW) SEE OTHER COMMENTS |
| | REGARDING ENERGY CALCS.SUBMIT THREE |
| | COPIES, ONLY ONE NEW AND TWO OLD ENERGY |
| | CALCS SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | 8-11.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 12.)IT APPEARS THAT ALL REFERENCES |
| | HAVE BEEN REVISEDEXCEPT THAT S-001 |
| | STILL REFERS TO ACI347R-94.IT IS |
| | CLOUDED BUT NOT REVISED. |
| | |
| | 13-23.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | COMMENTS FROM 2ND REVIEW, NOT ADDRESSED: |
| | |
| | 24.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 25.)THE ENERGY CALCS, CIVILS, AND |
| | ARCHITECTURALS CONFLICT AS TO THE |
| | BUILDING SIZE.NOTE THAT IMPACT FEE |
| | ASSESSMENT REVISION MAY BE REQUIRED WHEN |
| | THE ACTUAL BUILDING SIZE IS DETERMINED. |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW ? THE LETTER FROM THE |
| | ARCHITECT REGARDING THE DISCREPANCY IN |
| | SQUARE FOOTAGE ON THE ENERGY CALC IS |
| | ACKNOWLEDGED.PLEASE SEE FBC13-2, |
| | DEFINITIONS, CONDITIONED FLOOR AREA, TO |
| | BE MEASURED EXTERIOR FACES OF EXTERIOR |
| | WALLS.REVISE THE ENERGY CALCS; SQUARE |
| | FOOT AREA TO MATCH ARCHITECTURAL PLAN. |
| | |
| | 26.)ADDRESSED |
| | |
| | 27.)NOTHING ON THE SHEET 5 OF THE |
| | ENERGY CALCS IS MARKED AS BEING CHECKED. |
| | THIS IS REQUIRED TO SHOW CODE COMPLIANCE |
| | FBC13-103.1.1.1. |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW ? NOT ADDRESSED.HOWEVER, |
| | THIS WAS ON PAGE 5 OF THE OLD ENERGY |
| | CALC, NOW APPEARS ON PAGE 6.EITHER |
| | CHECK OR MARK N/A TO SHOW CODE |
| | COMPLIANCE, CANNOT BE LEFT BLANK. |
| | |
| | 28-33.)ADDRESSED |
| | |
| | 33.)PARKING IS TO COMPLY WITH CITY OF |
| | WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD, SEE ATTACHED. |
| | |
| | THE NOTE STATING THAT THEY WILL CONFORM |
| | TO THE STANDARD IS ACKNOWLEDGED. |
| | HOWEVER, THE DETAILS ON THE |
| | ARCHITECTURAL AND CIVIL SHEETS DO NOT |
| | COMPLY.REVISE. |
| | |
| | 34.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 35.)S103, CLARIFY AS TO WHY TWO OF THE |
| | CORNERS ARE ZONE 2 RATHER THAN ZONE 3. |
| | FBC16. |
| | |
| | THE RESPONSE FROM THE ARCHITECT THAT |
| | THOSE CORNERS ARE PROTECTED BY A PARAPET |
| | WALL IS ACKNOWLEDGED.HOWEVER, SEE |
| | ASCE7-02, SECTION 6.5.12.4.4 REGARDING |
| | PARAPETS.SHOW ZONE 3 ON ALL CORNERS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY ASCE7-02 DESIGN STANDARDS. |
| | |
| | THE SHEET WAS REVISED TO STATE FBC2001. |
| | GOVERNING CODE IS FBC2004.REVISE. |
| | |
| | 36.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 37.)PROVIDE A FIRE SPRINKLER PLAN |
| | FBC*106.3.5.1.1(5). |
| | |
| | THE ARCHITECT?S RESPONSE THAT THE |
| | SPRINKLER PLANS WERE PROVIDED IS |
| | ACKNOWLEDGED.HOWEVER, I AM UNABLE TO |
| | FIND THEM IN THE PACKAGE SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS, THIRD REVIEW |
| | |
| | 38.)ROOF PRESSURES ON THE RAS117 |
| | CALCULATIONS PREPARED BY ACRC ARE LOWER |
| | FOR ZONE 3 THAN THE PLAN.THIS MAY BE |
| | SUBMITTED LATER; NOT REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 39.)THE FIRE SPRINKLER ENGINEERING IS |
| | TO COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF |
| | FAC61G15-23.002 (TITLE BLOCK, INDEX |
| | SHEET).THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER |
| | WITH THE FIRE SPRINKLER PERMIT |
| | APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | 40.) THE CERTIFICATE OF FLAME RESISTANCE |
| | SUBMITTED FOR THE AWNING FABRIC DOES NOT |
| | SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC3105.3.1. |
| | PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS INFORMATION IS NOT |
| | REQUIRED AT THIS TIME; THIS CAN BE |
| | PROVIDED WITH THE AWNING PERMIT |
| | APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | 41.) PLEASE REVISE THE ADDRESS ON THE |
| | PLANS.THIS MAY BE DONE BY HAND.I |
| | APOLOGIZE THAT I AGREED THAT THIS MAY BE |
| | DONE BY LETTER; HOWEVER, I DID NOT |
| | REALIZE AT THAT TIME THAT THE ADDRESS ON |
| | THE PLAN WAS NOT THE ADDRESS FOR THE |
| | PARCEL.THE ADDRESS SHOWN ON THE PLAN, |
| | 201 EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE, DOES NOT |
| | EXIST.I THOUGHT THAT THE ADDRESS ON |
| | THE PLAN WAS 715 W EXECUTIVE CENTER |
| | DRIVE, WHICH IS THE SAME PARCEL AS 785 W |
| | EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE.MY APOLOGIES |
| | FOR ANY INCONVENIENCE. |
| | |
| | 42.)SEE ATTACHED FS553.80(2)(B).A 4X |
| | PLAN REVIEW FEE IS REQUIRED TO BE |
| | CHARGED IF THE CORRECTIONS ARE NOT |
| | ADDRESSED A THIRD TIME. |
