Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Permit 05090770
Permit Number 05090770
Review Stop E
Sequence Number 2
Notes
Date Text
2006-03-16 00:00:00GOLF SMITH
  
 ********* UNSAT 2ND REVIEW ***********
  
 PLEASE SEE PLANS ARE NOW BEING SUBMITTED
 FOR PERMIT. PLEASE SEE SOME COMMENTS ARE
 EXISTING FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW AND SOME
 NEW COMMENTS FOR 2004 FBC.
  
  
 1)NOTE:NOTE # 1 NO, PLEASE SEE SHEET
 A.01 WHICH STILL REFERENCES THE 1999
 NEC.
 PLEASE SEE E0.0 WHICH STILL REFLECTS THE
 "2001 FBC"??
 PLEASE SEE COMMENTS BELOW AS PERMIT
 APPLICATION IS NOW BEING MADE UNDER THE
 2004 FBC.
  
 **PLEASE SEE DUE TO PLANS BEING
 SUBMITTED FOR "PLAN REVIEW" ONLY, PLEASE
 BE AWARE AS OF OCT 1ST, 2005 THE NEW FBC
 2004 HAS BEEN ADOPTED AND IS NOW IN
 EFFECT.
 PLEASE SEE PLANS REFERENCE 2001 FBC
 WHICH CAN NO LONGER BE USED FOR DESIGN
 AND USE FOR THIS PROJECT.
 PLEASE KNOW WHEN SUBMITTING FOR PERMIT A
 , NEW PERMIT NUMBER WILL BE REQUIRED TO
 BE GENERATED FOR PROCESSING AFTER OCT
 1ST, 2005.
 PLEASE SEE WRONG CODE REFERENCED FOR
 LS101. NFPA-101 IS THE 2003 EDITION.
 PLEASE SEE OTHER COMMENTS FROM OTHER
 REVIEWERS WHICH WILL APPLY TO CODE
 CHANGE.
  
 2)NOTE:NOTE #2, OK, TITLE BLOCKS ARE
 NOW ADDED FOR ENGINEER'S, HOWEVER
 RESPONSE LTR MENTIONS THAT "EACH SHEET
 HAS THE CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION
 NUMBER." PLEASE VERIFY AS THE INDIVIDUAL
 ENGINEER'S WITH THE TITLE BLOCKS AS
 SHOWN DO NOT REQUIRE ANY CA # AND ONLY
 THE PE'S REGISTRATION # IS SHOWN.
 THE PREVIOUS REVIEW WAS NOT A COMMENT
 FOR ARCHITECTURAL FIRM. THE COMMENT ONLY
 MENTIONED THAT A CA # WOULD BE REQUIRED
 FOR ENGINEER'S/FIRM, "IF AAPLICABLE".
  
  
  
 **PLEASE SEE MISSING INFORMATION
 ON TITLE BLOCKS FOR ALL ENGINEER'S OF
 RECORD AS REQUIRED UNDER FAC
 61G15-23.002.
 PLEASE SEE M, E, P, PLANS ARE SIGNED,
 DATED AND SEALED BY ENGINEER'S, HOWEVER
 NO TITLE BLOCKS ARE SHOWN??
 PLEASE ALSO SEE FS 471.023 IF APPLICABLE
 FOR CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NUMBER.
 THIS IS REQUIRED OF ALL SHEETS AND FOR
 ALL TRADES WHETHER OR NOT COMMENT IS
 MADE BY OTHER REVIEWER(S).
  
 3)NOTE: NOTE #3 NO, IT IS NOTED THAT A
 DETAIL AND NOTE WAS ADDED FOR POLES AND
 LTS TO BE ABLE TO WINDSTAND 140 MPH,
 HOWEVER PLEASE SEE WIND LOAD
 CALCUALTIONS WERE NOT SUBMITTED. THESE
 ARE REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED, DATED AND
 SEALED BY A FLORIDA LICENSED PE.
  
 ** PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETE
 WIND-LOADING CALCULATIONS FOR
 SITE-LIGHTING POLES AND FIXTURES.
 PLEASE SUBMIT A DETAIL FOR POLE/FIXTURE
 AND FOUNDATION FOR POLE(S).
 PLEASE KNOW THE WIND LOADS ARE FER FBC
 140 MPH.
 PLEASE KNOW THAT THE STRUCTUAL
 CALCULATIONS WILL BE REVIEWED BY THE
 BUILDING REVIEWER.
  
 4)NOTE:NOTE #4 OK.
  
 5)NOTE: NOTE #5 OK
  
 6)NOTE: NOTE #6 OK.
  
 7)NOTE: NOTE #7 NO/YES. PLEASE SEE
 CALCUALTIONS WERE SUBMITTED FOR THE
 SAPCE THAT IS BEING BUILT OUT, HOWEVER,
 WATTS/PER FT, # OF RECEPTS @180VA PER
 EACH, ETC WAS NOT SHOWN. HOW WERE THESE
 LOADS DERIVED.?
  
 **PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETE LOAD
 CALCULATIONS FOR REVIEW. PLEASE ALSO
 INDICATE ALL CONTINUOUS LOADS AND
 LARGEST MOTOR LOADS AT 125%.
 220.3,220.10,220.13,220.11,215.3,230.42
 ETC.
  
 8)NOTE: NOTE #8 NO, PLEASE SEE PLANS
 STILL SHOW THIS PANEL BEING INSTALLED IN
 AN AREA FOR FUTURE TOILET??
  
 ** PLEASE VERIFY LOCATION OF NEW
 PANEL T-1 WHICH IS BEING SHOWN IN
 "FUTURE TOILET RM" IN FUTURE TENANT
 SPACE.
 240.24,215.5
  
 9)NOTE: NOTE #9 OK
  
 10)NOTE: NOTE #10 OK.
  
 11)NOTE: NOTE #11 OK.
  
 12)NOTE: NOTE #12 OK.
  
 13)NOTE: NOTE #13 ?PLEASE SEE
 GROUNDING ELECTRODE RISER WAS REVISED
 OK, HOWEVER SYSTEM SHOWN TO BLDG STEEL
 AND NOT FOOTER STEEL. PLEASE SEE THE
 BLDG STEEL IS OK AND IS REQUIRED ,
 HOWEVER FOOTER STEEL IS ALSO REQUIRED.
 250.50,250.52
  
 **PLEASE SEE NEC WHICH REQUIRES
 THE GROUNDING ELECTRODE TO BE
 CONTINUOUS, WHICH WOULD REQUIRE THE 3/0
 TO GROUND ROD ALSO. SHOWN AS #6.250.50
  
 NEW NOTE:
 ****************************************
  
 14) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 2004 FBC CHAPTER
 13-413.1ABC.1 PROVIDE VOLTAGE DROP
 ANALYSIS.
 PLEASE SEE 13-415.1.ABC.1.1 AND .2, SOME
 SORT OF DAY CONTROL WAS SUBMITTED,
 HOWEVER PLEASE SUBMIT MORE DETAILS FOR
 SYSTEM BEING INSTALLED.
 PLEASE SEE INDICATE ALL OVER-RIDE
 LOCATION CLEARLY ON PLANS.
 PLEASE SEE .2, FOR SPACE CONTROLL FOR
 ALL INDIVIDUAL SPACES CONTAINING WALLS.
 PLEASE PROVIDE CALCS PER 13-415.1.AB.1
  
  
 15) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NOTE BELOW WHICH
 REQUESTED ON FIRST REVIEW TO SUBMIT
 OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SEPARATELY. PLEASE SEE
 THESE SHEET ARE ATTACHED TO NEW SETS.
 PLEASE SUBMIT NEW SETS AND OLD SET
 SEPARATELY.
  
  
 ** PLEASE SEE ANY POSSIBLE COMMENTS FROM
 OTHER REVIEWER(S) WHICH MAY AFFECT
 EELCTRICAL PLANS.
  
 ** PLEASE COMPLETELY REMOVE ANY
 OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW
 SHEETS INTO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND
 STAMPING.
 PLEASE SUBMIT ONE COMPLETE SET OF ALL
 OLD/VOIDED SHEETS FOR REFERENCE ONLY.
 THESE SHALL BE SEPARATE FROM COMPLETE
 SETS.
  
 PLEASE SUBMIT THE ABOVE INFORMATION FOR
 REVIEW. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS,
 PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING
 THIS OFFICE.
  
 DEWEY PALMER
 ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW
 561-805-6717
 [email protected]
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved