| Date |
Text |
| 2005-12-22 00:00:00 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | 05090646 AND 05090647 |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | |
| | PREVIOUS CORRECTION LIST; NUMBERING TO |
| | REMAIN THE SAME FOR CONSISTENCY |
| | |
| | 1.)A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE |
| | FILED WITH THE CLERK OF COURTS BEFORE A |
| | PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. |
| | |
| | REQUIRED BEFORE THE PERMIT CAN BE |
| | ISSUED. |
| | |
| | 2.)UNDER WHICH CODE HAS THIS PROJECT |
| | BEEN DESIGNED?FBC2001 OR FBC2004? |
| | SPECIFY ON THE PLAN.THIS COMMENT LIST |
| | CANNOT REFER TO SPECIFIC CODE SECTIONS |
| | AS THIS HAS NOT YET BEEN DETERMINED. |
| | |
| | FBC2000 WAS HAND WRITTEN ON THE PLAN, |
| | SHEET 2. THIS IS NOT A VALID GOVERNING |
| | CODE. SHEET 5 HAS FBC2004 HAND WRITTEN. |
| | ANY CHANGES TO THE PLAN ARE TO BE DONE |
| | BY THE ENGINEER.IF CHANGES ARE |
| | HANDWRITTEN, THEY ARE TO BE INITIALED. |
| | AS IT APPEARS THAT CHANGES MAY HAVE BEEN |
| | DONE BY SOMEONE OTHER THAN MR. MOLYET, |
| | PE, I WOULD LIKE CONFIRMATION EITHER BY |
| | SIGNED AND SEALED LETTER THAT HAND |
| | WRITTEN CHANGES WERE DONE BY HIM, OR |
| | HAVE THE CHANGES IMPLEMENTED INTO THE |
| | PLAN AND NEW SHEETS PRINTED. |
| | |
| | IT IS STILL UNCLEAR AS TO WHICH CODE THE |
| | ENGINEER HAS DESIGNED TO. |
| | |
| | 3.)THE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM IS TO BE |
| | DESIGNED BY A FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM |
| | DESIGNER, FS553.79(6)(C), FAC61G15-32. |
| | SOMEONE HAS WRITTEN "PRE ENGINEERED" ON |
| | THE SPECIFICATION SHEETS, AND MADE |
| | REFERENCE TO UL1245.THIS IS A TEST |
| | STANDARD, NOT A LISTING.ONE SET HAS |
| | BEEN RETAINED. |
| | |
| | NOT ADDRESSED.SAME PLANS SUBMITTED. |
| | THE WORDS "PYRO-CHEM IS THE DESIGNER FOR |
| | A PRE-ENGINEERED FIRE SYSTEM - UL 1254 |
| | IS THE LISTING" WAS WRITTEN ON THE SAME |
| | UNSEALED PLAN.IF PYRO-CHEM IS LICENSED |
| | TO BE A FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM DESIGNER, |
| | PROVIDE PLANS IN COMPLIANCE - SIGNED, |
| | SEALED, TITLE BLOCK.SEE FAC61G15-23, |
| | FAC615-32.PLEASE CONTACT FBPE IF THE |
| | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IS UNCLEAR AS TO HIS |
| | OR HER RESPONSIBILITIES. |
| | |
| | 4.)THE SITE PLAN IS NOT CLEAR.IS |
| | THE PAINT SPRAY BOOTH INSIDE OF THE |
| | BUILDING?THE ORIGINAL SITE PLAN HAS |
| | BEEN ALTERED.IF IT IS OUTSIDE, PROVIDE |
| | WIND DESIGN AND ANCHORING INFORMATION |
| | FBC16. |
| | |
| | PROVIDE A SITE PLAN PREPARED BY DESIGNER |
| | OF RECORD AS THE SITE PLAN ADDRESSES |
| | CODE COMPLIANCE ISSUES. |
| | |
| | 5.)PROVIDE INFORMATION IN REGARDS TO |
| | THE BOOTH.CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, |
| | CONNECTIONS, ETC. |
| | |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD IS TO PROVIDE DESIGN |
| | CRITERIA ON THE PLAN.THE ASSEMBLY |
| | INSTRUCTIONS ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE A |
| | PART OF THE PERMIT PACKAGE.HAVE THE |
| | ENGINEER PROVIDE INFORMATION REQUESTED. |
| | |
| | 6.)DECLARE OCCUPANCY FOR THE EXISTING |
| | STRUCTURES, THE PREP STATION AND THE |
| | PAINT BOOTH.FBC3.SHOW OCCUPANCY |
| | SEPARATION IF APPLICABLE. |
| | |
| | NOT ADDRESSED."ONE MAN IN PAINT BOOTH" |
| | IS NOT AN OCCUPANCY.IF THE ENGINEER IS |
| | UNCLEAR AS TO HOW TO DECLARE AN |
| | OCCUPANCY AND SHOW SEPARATIONS AS |
| | REQUESTED, PLEASE HAVE HIM CONTACT ME. |
| | |
| | 7.)WHERE IS THE PAINT STORED?PROVIDE |
| | GALLONS, TYPE, ETC. TO ASSIST IN |
| | DETERMINING OCCUPANCY, SEE H AND S |
| | OCCUPANCIES. |
| | |
| | NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 8.)ARE YOU USING LP OR NATURAL GAS? |
| | BOTH ARE SHOWN ON THE PLAN.WHAT IS |
| | THIS FOR? |
| | |
| | THERE IS A NOTE (WHICH IS NOT INITIALED |
| | AS REQUIRED) WHICH INDICATES THAT THIS |
| | WILL BE NATURAL GAS.WHAT IS THIS FOR? |
| | |
| | 9.)SHEET 2 OF 6, PLAN VIEW, REFERS TO |
| | CLASSES AND DIVISIONS.WHAT IS THE CODE |
| | REFERENCE FOR THIS?INFORMATION ON THE |
| | PLAN IS TO BE SPECIFIC, AND CANNOT REFER |
| | TO CODE ONLY, ESPECIALLY CODES WHICH ARE |
| | NOT GOVERNING CODE FOR THIS PROJECT, FBC |
| | CHAPTER 1. |
| | |
| | NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 10.)THE PRINTED NAME AND LICENSE |
| | NUMBER OF THE PERSON SEALING THE PLAN IS |
| | TO BE ON THE DOCUMENT, FAC61G15-23.002. |
| | |
| | PROVIDE A TITLE BLOCK WITH ALL |
| | INFORMATION REQUIRED BY FAC61G15-23.002. |
| | |
| | 11.)PROVIDE A PENETRATION DETAIL FOR |
| | THE EXHAUST AND INTAKE. |
| | |
| | NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 12.)THE CONNECTIONS FOR THE PLENUM, |
| | SHEET 3, IS TO BE DONE "BY OTHERS". |
| | PROVIDE A DETAIL. |
| | |
| | ENGINEER CANNOT ADDRESS THIS STRUCTURAL |
| | ITEM WITH A SHOP DRAWING.INCORPORATE |
| | INTO THE PLAN OR PROVIDE A TITLE BLOCK, |
| | SIGN AND SEAL THE DRAWING WHICH WAS |
| | STAPLED TO THE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 13.)SHOW THE DOOR DIMENSION, FBC10. |
| | |
| | CHANGES TO THE PLAN ARE TO BE INITIALED |
| | OR INCORPORATED INTO THE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 14.)A PLAN WAS SHOWN FOR THE PAINT |
| | BOOTH, BUT NOT FOR THE PREP STATION.IT |
| | APPEARS THAT ONE SIDE OF THE PREP |
| | STATION IS OPEN, IS THAT CORRECT?IF |
| | NOT, SHOW EXIT DOOR ON THE PLAN. |
| | |
| | SHEET 2 SHOWS DOORS WHICH DO NOT APPEAR |
| | TO BE COMPLIANT WITH FBC11-4.13.PLAN |
| | VIEW HAS AN ACCESS DOOR HAND DRAWN.IT |
| | APPEARS THAT THERE ARE FOLDING DOORS IN |
| | THE FRONT, BUT THE PLAN VIEW DOES NOT |
| | CORRELAT WITH THE FRONT VIEW.THERE ARE |
| | TWO PLAN VIEWS, BOTH REFER TO THE SPRAY |
| | BOOTH.PROVIDE FLOOR PLANS FOR THE PREP |
| | STATION AND THE PAINT BOOTH, CLEARLY |
| | SHOW DOORS, SO THAT CODE COMPLIANCE (FBC |
| | CHAPTER 10 AND FBC CHAPTER 11) CAN BE |
| | DETERMINED. |
| | |
| | 15.)SHOW EXITING INFORMATION, SEE |
| | FBC10. |
| | |
| | NOT ADDRESSED.ENGINEER IS TO PROVIDE A |
| | CLEAR SITE PLAN, A FLOOR PLAN OF THE |
| | EXISTING, SHOW THE PROPOSED |
| | IMPROVEMENTS, AND A LIFE SAFETY PLAN. |
| | |
| | NOTE - NOT ENOUGH INFORMATION ON THE |
| | PLAN TO DETERMINE CODE COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENT - |
| | |
| | 16.)SEE ATTACHED FS553.80(2)(B).A 4X |
| | PLAN REVIEW FEE WILL BE CHARGED IF |
| | COMMENTS ARE NOT PROPERLY ADDRESSED IN |
| | THE THIRD REVIEW. |
