| Date |
Text |
| 2006-11-15 14:22:02 | ******** UNSAT 5TH REVIEW ******** |
| | |
| | *** PLEASE SEE THAT THERE ARE MANY COMMENTS FROM |
| | PREVIOUS REVIEW WHICH ARE STILL IN NEED OF ADDRESSING |
| | ALONG WITH SOME NEW COMMENTS BASED ON PLANS SUBMITTED |
| | WHICH CONTAIN DIFFERENT ITEMS FROM THE PREVIOUS |
| | REVIEW. |
| | THIS IS THE 5TH REVIEW, HOWEVER THE 2ND REVIEW FOR THIS |
| | NEW DESIGNER OF RECORD. |
| | |
| | *** PLEASE SEE COMMENTS BELOW ARE TAKEN DIRECTLY FROM |
| | PREVIOUS REVIEW WITH EITHER AND "OK" OR A "NO" WITH |
| | FURTHER EXPLANATION ADDED. |
| | PLEASE SEE SOME COMMENTS MAY BE LABELED OK/NO, AS PART |
| | OF THE COMMENT MAY HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED AND PART OF THE |
| | COMMENT MAY NOT HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | **PLEASE SEE ANY COMPLETELY NEW NOTES WILL BE ADDED TO |
| | THE END OF THESE NOTES AND LABELED "NEW NOTES 5TH |
| | REVIEW". |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE KNOW THAT TO DATE OF THIS REVIEW NO ONE HAS |
| | CONTACTED THIS REVIEWER TO GO OVER ANY COMMENTS OR HAVE |
| | MADE ANY INQUIRIES IF ANY OF THE COMMENTS WERE NOT |
| | UNDERSTOOD IN ANY FASHION. |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE:NO, PLEASE SEE THE ORIGINAL PERMIT |
| | APPLICATION HAS STILL NOT BEEN SUBMITTED BACK. WE DO |
| | NOT KEEP THE APPLICATIONS ARE THEY ARE RETURNED WITH |
| | THE PLANS WHEN THEY ARE PICKED UP. PLEASE KNOW THAT IN |
| | WORST CASE SCENARIO, A NEW PERMIT APPLICATION MAY BE |
| | FILLED OUT AND SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE FROM REVIEW #4** |
| | PLEASE SEE THE PERMIT APPLICATION SUBMITTED BACK IN |
| | FACT A PHOTO-COPY OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION. MUST |
| | SUBMIT THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FOR PROCESSING AND |
| | PERMITTING OF PROJECT. |
| | |
| | 2) NOTE: OK. |
| | |
| | 3) NOTE:NO, PLEASE SEE THE RESPONSE LETTER MENTIONS |
| | THE PLANS WILL NOW BE SIGNED WITH THE ENGINEER'S LEGAL |
| | SIGNATURE AND NOT INITIALS; HOWEVER PLEASE SEE THE |
| | PLANS DO NOT STILL SEEM TO INDICATE INITIALS. PLEASE |
| | SEE THE RESPONSE LETTER WHICH IS "SIGNED" FROM THE |
| | ENGINEER OF RECORD CONTAINS A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT |
| | SIGNATURE OF THAT ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE FROM REVIEW #4** |
| | PLEASE SEE FS 471.025 AS THIS REQUIRES THE PLANS TO BE |
| | SIGNED WITH LEGAL SIGNATURE. PLANS SEEM BE SIGNED WITH |
| | WHAT APPEARS TO BE INITIALS, IF INDEED THIS IS THE |
| | LEGAL SIGNATURE, PLEASE PROVIDE A SIGNED, DATED AND |
| | SEALED LETTER FOR VERIFICATION. LETTER IS ALSO REQUIRED |
| | TO BE PROPERLY NOTARIZED UNDER FS 117.05. |
| | PLEASE KNOW THIS WILL BE PLACED IN OUR SIGNATURE FILE |
| | FOR ANY FURTHER REFERENCE. |
| | |
| | 4) NOTE: NO, PLEASE SEE PANEL SCHEDULE(S) AND LOAD |
| | CALCULATIONS NOW INDICATE TWO SMALL APPLIANCE CIRCUITS; |
| | HOWEVER THE 2ND SMALL APPLIANCE CIRCUIT IS LOCATED |
| | FEEDING THE LIVING ROOM RECEPTACLES. PLEASE SEE |
| | 250.52B1, AS THIS IS NOT PERMITTED. PLEASE SEE THE SAME |
| | CODE ARTICLE GIVEN WHICH DEPICTS THE LOCATIONS |
| | PERMITTED AND MAY NOT FEED ANY OTHER AREAS. PLEASE ALSO |
| | SEE ONE OF THE SMALL APPLIANCE CIRCUITS ALSO FEEDS GFI |
| | RECEPTACLES LOCATED OUTSIDE WHICH IS ALSO NOT |
| | PERMITTED. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE FROM REVIEW #4** |
| | PLEASE SEE MISSING TWO MINIMUM SMALL APPLIANCE CIRCUITS |
| | FROM PLANS, AND PANEL SCHEDULES, ALTHOUGH THESE ARE |
| | NOTED IN LOAD CALCULATIONS?? |
| | PLEASE SEE 210.52B1,210.11C1,220.16 |
| | |
| | 5) NOTE: OK. |
| | |
| | 6) NOTE: OK, THE DISHWASHERS WERE REMOVED FROM PLANS |
| | AND IN RESPONSE LETTER HOWEVER SEE NEW NOTES. |
| | |
| | 7) NOTE:OK, HOWEVER SEE NEW NOTES PERTAINING TO |
| | CIRCUITING AND DESIGNATIONS ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE FROM 4TH REVIEW ** |
| | PLEASE LIST ARC FAULT PROTECTION ON THE PANEL SCHEDULE |
| | FOR ALL OUTLET LOCATED ON BEDROOMS. PLEASE SEE 2002 NEC |
| | 210.12, WHICH REQUIRES AFP FOR ALL, NOT ONLY RECEPTS AS |
| | SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | 8) NOTE: OK, A/C'S REMOVED. |
| | |
| | 9) NOTE: NO, PLEASE SEE THE TOTAL LOADS SHOWN ON PANEL |
| | SCHEDULES STILL DO NOT CORRELATE WITH THE LOAD |
| | CALCULATIONS AS SHOWN. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE FROM REVIEW #4** |
| | PLEASE SEE NEC FOR LOAD CALCULATIONS. PLEASE SEE TOTAL |
| | ON PANEL SCHEDULES DO NOT CORRELATE WITH CALCULATIONS. |
| | PLEASE SEE DE-RATING TWICE IS NOT PERMITTED. THE TOTAL |
| | LOAD ON EACH PANEL MAY BE DE-RATED FOR PANEL, BUT NOT |
| | FOR TOTALS FOR THE TABLE DE-RATINGS IN 220.32. PLEASE |
| | SEE THE HOUSE LOADS ARE TO BE SHOWN SEPARATELY, AND |
| | ADDED TO TOTAL. |
| | PLEASE SEE NEC 220, ALL. |
| | PLEASE SEE ALL OTHER COMMENTS AS THE LOADS WILL BE |
| | CHANGING. |
| | 215.5, 220, |
| | FBC ADMIN SECT 106.1.2 |
| | |
| | 10) NOTE: OK. |
| | |
| | 11) NOTE: OK. |
| | |
| | 12) NOTE: OK/ NO. PLEASE SEE A NOTE WAS ADJUSTED AND |
| | NOW READS "FOOTER-STEEL IF AVAILABLE". PLEASE KNOW THIS |
| | IS OK, HOWEVER AS NOTED IN THE PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE; |
| | PLEASE SEE THAT THE CODES BEING REFERENCED ARE NOT FROM |
| | THE 2002 NEC (NFPA-70) AND DO NOT MATCH WITH THE |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF THE GROUNDING ELECTRODE SYSTEM. PLEASE |
| | BE SURE TO SEE THE 2002 AS THE STATE OF FLORIDA HAS NOT |
| | YET ADOPTED THE 2005 NEC. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE FROM REVIEW #4** |
| | PLEASE SEE GROUNDING ELECTRODE RISER INDICATE FOOTER |
| | STEEL TO BE PART OF THE GE SYSTEM? |
| | PLEASE KNOW IN NEW CONSTRUCTION IT IS AVAILABLE AND IS |
| | REQUIRED TO BE A PART OF THE SYSTEM, HOWEVER PLEASE SEE |
| | THAT THIS IS AN EXISTING BUILDING AND ATTACHING TO THE |
| | EXISTING FOOTER IS NOT REQUIRED, HOWEVER MAY BE DONE. |
| | PLEASE KNOW, THIS MAY AFFECT THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY |
| | OF THE EXISTING. |
| | ** PLEASE SEE THE NEC CODES BEING REFERENCE ARE NOT |
| | FROM THE CURRENT NEC 2002. PLEASE REVISE. |
| | PLEASE KNOW, SINCE EXISTING FOOTER STEEL CAN NOT BE |
| | VERIFIED EVEN IF THE ATTACHMENT IS MADE, A MIN OF TWO |
| | GROUND RODS WILL BE REQUIRED. |
| | 250.50, 250.56 |
| | |
| | 13) NOTE: NO, PLEASE SEE NO PHOTO-METRICS WERE |
| | SUBMITTED OR ANY LIGHTING LEVELS SHOWN. |
| | PLEASE ALSO SEE THAT NOW THAT LIGHTING HAS BEEN ADDED |
| | PLEASE SEE NEW NOTES FOR THIS REVIEW WITH RESPECT TO |
| | CIRCUITING AND CONTROL OF THESE NEW LIGHTS ADDED. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE FROM REVIEW #4** |
| | PLEASE SEE MISSING LIGHTING FOR EGRESS STAIRS PER LS |
| | 101 7.8.1.3, |
| | 7.9.2.2. |
| | PLEASE NOTE AND SHOW A MIN OF 10FT CANDLES REQUIRED FOR |
| | STAIRS UNDER NORMAL, AND 1FT CANDLE MIN REQUIRED UNDER |
| | EMERGENCY POWER. |
| | PLEASE SHOW. |
| | |
| | 14) NOTE:NO, PLEASE SEE CIRCUITS ARE ADDED AND SHOWN, |
| | HOWEVER AS STATED ON THE PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE, PLEASE |
| | KNOW THESE DEDICATED CIRCUIT(S) MUST MEET 210.11C3. |
| | THERE ARE ONLY TWO WAYS THIS CANE BE DONE. IN EITHER |
| | CASE, THESE MAY NOT FEED ANY OTHER RECEPTACLES IN ANY |
| | OTHER AREAS. (OUTSIDE ETC) |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE FROM REVIEW #4** |
| | PLEASE SEE MISSING THE REQUIRED DEDICATED BATH(S) |
| | CIRCUIT(S) AS REQUIRED PER 210.52D,210.11C3, MUST BE |
| | 20A AND #12 AWG. |
| | |
| | 15) NOTE: NO, PLEASE SEE NEW PANEL SCHEDULE WERE |
| | SUBMITTED, HOWEVER THE CIRCUITS, SPARES AND NUMERICAL |
| | DESIGNATIONS OF THE PANEL SIZE AND NUMBER OF POLES |
| | STILL DO NOT CORRELATE. PLEASE ALSO SEE NEW NOTES DUE |
| | TO THE NEW REVISED PANEL SCHEDULE SUBMITTED AND THE |
| | NOTES ADDED TO PLANS. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE FROM REVIEW #4** |
| | PLEASE SEE PLANS INDICATE CIRCUITS WHICH ARE NOT ON |
| | PANEL SCHEDULE(S). IN FACT, THESE CIRCUITS ON PANEL |
| | SCHEDULES ARE SHOWN AS SPARES?? |
| | PLEASE ADJUST. |
| | |
| | 16) NOTE: OK. |
| | |
| | 17) NOTE: OK/NO. PLEASE SEE THE FIXTURE(S) SEEM TO HAVE |
| | BEEN MOVED ON TWO OF THE CLOSETS, HOWEVER NOT ALL. |
| | PLEASE ALSO SEE EVEN OF A FIXTURE HAS BEEN MOVED TO THE |
| | WALL ABOVE DOOR, AS THE FIXTURE DESCRIPTION IS NOT |
| | INDICATED ON SYMBOL LEGEND, THEN AT THIS TIME IT IS NOT |
| | KNOWN WHETHER OR NOT THESE FIXTURE MOVED MEET CODE AS |
| | OF YET. PLEASE SEE ALL CLOSETS WITH STORAGE CONTAINING |
| | EASILY IGNITABLE MATERIALS AND COMBUSTIBLES MUST MEET |
| | THIS SECTION. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE FROM REVIEW #4** |
| | PLEASE SEE 410.8 FOR THE MINIMUM REQUIRED CLEARANCES |
| | FOR CLOSET LT'S. |
| | PLEASE SEE CODE AS A 18" ASSUMED SHELVING LINE IS |
| | SHOWN. |
| | |
| | 18) NOTE: OK. |
| | |
| | 19) NOTE: OK. |
| | |
| | 20) NOTE: NO, SAME NOTE. PLANS ARE REQUIRED TO SHOW |
| | SERVICE AS SHOWN ON RISER ON PLANS. PLANS ONLY SHOW ONE |
| | DISCONNECT AND ONE METER. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE FROM REVIEW #4** |
| | PLEASE SHOW ALL METERS/MAINS/SERVICE EQUIPMENT ON |
| | PLANS. |
| | RISER SEEMS TO NOW INDICATE SERVICE AS EXISTING, |
| | HOWEVER THIS LOCATION AND BUILDING DOES NOT SEEM THIS |
| | IS EXISTING, AND /OR FEEDERS AND SEC'S BEING STILL |
| | INTACT FROM THE PICTURES OF THIS PROJECT. |
| | THIS SHOULD BE VERIFIED. |
| | 310.16,240.4,215.5, ETC. |
| | |
| | |
| | ******* NEW NOTES FOR REVIEW #5 ************ |
| | THIS IS DUE TO CHANGES IN PLANS SUBMITTED WHICH WERE |
| | NOT ON PREVIOUS PLANS. |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE AS LIGHTING HAS BEEN ADDED TO THE |
| | PLANS FOR EGRESS AS NOTED ABOVE, PLEASE SEE THESE ARE |
| | REQUIRED TO BE CIRCUITED AND ALL EMERGENCY LIGHTING |
| | SHALL BE CIRCUITED PER 700.12E. PLEASE SEE A NOTE WAS |
| | ADDED WHICH MENTIONS THEY ARE CIRCUITED TO THE "SAME |
| | ROOM"? AS PLANS DO NOT INDICATE ANY ROOM FOR THIS |
| | PLEASE ADJUST AND CIRCUIT AS REQUIRED. |
| | PLEASE ALSO SEE PLANS DO NOT INDICATE ANY MEANS OF |
| | CONTROL FOR THESE LIGHTS. THIS MUST BE AN AUTOMATED |
| | CONTROL OF SOME SORT. (PHOTOCELL/ASTRONOMICAL TIME |
| | CLOCK ETC). |
| | LS-101 NFPA-101 7.8.1.3, 7.9.2.2 ETC. |
| | |
| | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PLANS NOW INDICATE A HOUSE PANEL ON |
| | RISER, HOWEVER NO PANEL SCHEDULE WAS SUBMITTED SHOWING |
| | THE OVER CURRENT PROTECTION DEVICE AND CONDUCTOR SIZES |
| | ETC. |
| | PLEASE SUBMIT. |
| | FBC 106.1.2, 106.3.5.1.2 ADMINISTRATIVE SECTION AS |
| | ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH. |
| | NEC 408.4, 240.4, 310.16 ETC. |
| | |
| | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE A NOTE AT THE BOTTOM OF THE LOAD |
| | CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED NOW CONTAINS A NOTE WHICH |
| | STATES: ?FEEDER SIZE SHALL BE BASED UPON 175A'S?? |
| | PLEASE CLARIFY THIS NOTE AS IT SEEMS TO BE LOCATED JUST |
| | BELOW THE CALCULATIONS FOR COMMERCIAL HOUSE PANEL, |
| | HOWEVER THE HOUSE PANEL IS BEING SHOWN AS 100A?S AND |
| | SERVICE ENTRANCE CONDUCTORS TAPPED FROM GUTTER ARE |
| | BASED ON 100A?S. |
| | THIS NOTE IS UNCLEAR AND IS NOT KNOWN TO THIS REVIEWER |
| | WHAT IT HAS TO DO WITH ANYTHING AS SUBMITTED AND SHOWN |
| | ON PLANS. |
| | FBC ADMIN SECT 106.1.2, NEC 215.5 |
| | |
| | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE AS NOTED ABOVE IN NOTE #15, PLEASE |
| | CORRELATE ALL CIRCUITING AS SHOWN ON PLANS WITH PANEL |
| | SCHEDULES. PLEASE SEE DESIGNATIONS FOR BEDROOMS WHICH |
| | SEEM TO BE REVERSED. |
| | 408.4, |
| | FBC 106.1.2 |
| | |
| | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE DRYER IS BEING SHOWN ON TWO SINGLE |
| | POLE 20AMP CIRCUITS WHERE THE DRYER IS SHOWN AS A 5KW |
| | UNIT IN LOAD CALCULATIONS. PLEASE ALSO SEE NOTE CLOUDED |
| | NOTE AREA ON THE UPPER RIGHT HAND CORNER OF THE PLANS |
| | ON E-2 AND E-2 INDICATE THE REQUIRED CIRCUITS AND THE |
| | NOTE FOR THE DRYER DOES NOT CORRELATE. |
| | PLEASE RE-FIGURE THE MINIMUM OVER CURRENT PROTECTION |
| | FOR THIS AS, 5KW AT 240V IS HIGHER THAN 20A'S AS SHOWN. |
| | PLEASE ALSO SEE THIS WOULD NOT BE ON TOW 1-POLE |
| | CIRCUITS. |
| | 240.4, 310.16, 220.18, 422 ETC |
| | |
| | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE RANGE LOAD IS SHOWN AT 33A'S. |
| | PLEASE SEE 8KW @ 240V'S. MAY GO UP, HOWEVER MAY NOT GO |
| | DOWN ON THE FINAL OUT COME OF THAT FIGURE WHEN THE |
| | CALCULATIONS ARE DONE. |
| | PLEASE SEE 220.31, 220.19 ETC |
| | |
| | 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PANEL SCHEDULE IS LABELED AS |
| | 3-PHASE ON SCHEDULE, YET THE PANEL AND SERVICE IS |
| | SINGLE PHASE?? |
| | PLEASE SEE PHASE? A, B, C BEING SHOWN?? |
| | PLEASE CORRELATE. |
| | 408.4, 230.70 |
| | FBC 106.1.2 |
| | |
| | 8) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PANEL DESIGNATIONS ON PLANS HAVE |
| | NOW BEEN CHANGED. PLEASE SEE PLANS INDICATE AN "F" IN |
| | FRONT OF ALL THE PANELS. (EXAMPLE) FA, FB, FC AND FD, |
| | YET PANEL SCHEDULE AND CIRCUITING INDICATES A, B, C AND |
| | D ONLY. |
| | WHERE DOES THE F COME INTO THE DESIGN? |
| | NEC 408.4, |
| | FBC 106.3.5.1.2 |
| | |
| | 9) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NOTE #6 FROM 4TH REVIEW WHICH SPOKE |
| | OF THE MULTIPLE CIRCUITS FOR THE DISHWASHER, YET THE |
| | DISHWASHERS WERE REMOVED. |
| | PLEASE SEE CLOUDED AREA ON UPPER RIGHT HAND SIDE OF |
| | PLANS WHICH INDICATE CIRCUITS REQUIRED WHICH STILL |
| | MENTIONS DISHWASHER(S)? |
| | THIS IS NOT CLEAR AS LETTER MENTIONS REMOVED, YET NOTED |
| | ON PLANS AS BEING REQUIRED. |
| | PLEASE CORRELATE AND COMPLETE SCOPE WHICH IS BEING |
| | DONE. |
| | 408.4, 310.16, |
| | FBC ADMIN SECTION 106.1.2 |
| | |
| | 10) NOTE: PLEASE SEE COPY OF FLORIDA STATUTES |
| | 553.80(2)(B) WITH RESPECT TO DESIGN PROFESSIONALS AND |
| | REPEAT COMMENTS. |
| | PLEASE ALSO KNOW THAT ONE SET OF EACH ELECTRICAL HAVE |
| | NOW BEEN RETAINED. |
| | |
| | |
| | ** ** IMPORTANT** |
| | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE |
| | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE |
| | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED |
| | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED |
| | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW |
| | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. |
| | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED |
| | FOR REFERENCE. |
| | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND |
| | AVOID ANY DELAYS. |
| | |
| | **PLEASE SUBMIT THE ABOVE INFORMATION FOR REVIEW. **IF |
| | THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS, COMMENTSOR IF ANY OF THE |
| | NOTES TYPEDWHICH ARE UNCLEAR IN ANY WAY, PLEASE DO |
| | NOT HESITATEIN CONTACTING THIS REVIEWER. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
