| Date |
Text |
| 2005-12-07 00:00:00 | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | PERMIT: 05071027 |
| | ADD: 2211 N FLAGLER DR |
| | CONT: PLAN REVIEW |
| | OWNER: MERCO GROUP |
| | TEL: (561)296-3300 |
| | ARCH: SONG & ASSOC/ JOHN STRNDBERG |
| | |
| | TEL: (561) 655-2423 |
| | |
| | -PALADIO TERRACE- |
| | |
| | FL BLD CODE= 2001 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE |
| | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE |
| | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY |
| | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER |
| | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUM- |
| | BER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION |
| | MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICA |
| | TION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND |
| | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK |
| | YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | - NOTE- |
| | |
| | CHAPTER 553.80(2)(B) FLORIDA STATUTES |
| | STATES THAT A LOCAL GOVERNMENT SHALL |
| | IMPOSE A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE FEE FOR |
| | PLAN REVIEW, IF PLANS ARE REJECTED THREE |
| | OR MORE TIMES FOR REPEATED FAILURE TO |
| | CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW |
| | ACTION: DENIED |
| | |
| | 1) COMMENT# 1 FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW, |
| | ALTHOUGH THERE IS A FOUNDATION PERMIT |
| | PLEASE SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING ITEMS SINCE |
| | THE FOUNDATION AND BUILDING PERMITS ARE |
| | STAND ALONE PERMITS. |
| | A) SOILS REPORT (3) |
| | B) THRESHOLD INSPECTION PLAN (3) |
| | C) THRESHOLD INSPECTOR AGREEMENT(1) |
| | D) NOTICE OF COMENCEMENT (1) |
| | E) UNITY OF TITLE |
| | |
| | 2) COMMENT# 2 FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW, |
| | LS0.00 CODE ANALYSIS IS MISSING: |
| | THE PLANS ARE VAUGE IN THE |
| | DESCRIPTION WHERE AS THE FOLLOWING |
| | INFORMATION WAS TO BE FOUND OR IN THE |
| | AMOUNT OF INFORMATION PROVIDED. |
| | 104.2.1 W.P.B. ADMINISTRATIVE CODE |
| | *************************************** |
| | SUCH INFORMATION SHALL BE SPECIFIC |
| | AND THE TECHNICAL CODES "SHALL NOT BE |
| | CITED AS A WHOLE OR IN PART, NOR THE |
| | TERM "LEGAL" OR ITS RQUIVALENT BE USED |
| | AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR SPECIFIC |
| | INFORMATION". PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR |
| | CODE COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | 2A) 412.4.3 A FIRE COMMAND STATION SHALL |
| | CONTAIN: |
| | |
| | 1. CONTROLS FOR THE ONE-WAY VOICE |
| | ALARM SYSTEM. |
| | |
| | 2. CONTROLS FOR THE TWO-WAY FIRE |
| | DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION SYSTEM. |
| | |
| | 3. FIRE ALARM SYSTEM ANNUNCIATOR |
| | PANELS. |
| | PLEASE INDICATE ON SHEET E-21 ITEMS 1-3 |
| | WILL BE UNDER FIRE ALARM PANEL. |
| | |
| | |
| | 4. STATUS INDICATORS SHOWING |
| | LOCATION OF ELEVATORS IN THE HOISTWAYS |
| | ANDSWITCHES TO SELECTIVELY TURN |
| | POWER TO ELEVATORS ON OR OFF. |
| | THIS COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED ON SHEET |
| | E-21, PLEASE INDICATE LOCATION. |
| | |
| | 5. STATUS INDICATORS AND CONTROLS |
| | FOR AIR HANDLING SYSTEMS. SEE MECHANICAL |
| | SHEET, SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM WILL BE |
| | OPERATED THROUGH THE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM. |
| | THIS DOESN'T PROVIDE THE INFORMATION |
| | "HOW" THIS WILL BE COMPLETED. PROVIDE A |
| | SMOKE CONTROL STUDY FOR THE ATRUIM |
| | AREAS. WILL BE DISCUSSED LATER UNDER |
| | HEADING OF ATRIUM. |
| | |
| | 6. CONTROLS FOR UNLOCKING ALL |
| | STAIRWAY DOORS SIMULTANEOUSLY. |
| | E-21 LIST WHAT PANEL THIS SHALL OCCUR. |
| | |
| | 7. SPRINKLER VALVE, WATERFLOW |
| | DETECTOR AND FIRE PUMP DISPLAY PANELS. |
| | NOTE THIS INFORMATION ON E-21 UNDER THE |
| | HEADING F. P. ASSUMING THIS STAND FOR |
| | FIRE PUMP. |
| | |
| | 9. A TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| | USE WITH CONTROLLED ACCESS TO THE |
| | PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM.COULD NOT FIND |
| | ON E-21? |
| | |
| | 2B) SMOKE CONTROL 412.5 PROVIDE CODE |
| | COMPLIANCE, ALSO REQUIRES COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH ALL PARTS OF THE HIGH RISE |
| | INCLUDING THE ATRIUM FOUND UNDER SECTION |
| | 414. 1-10. |
| | * PROVIDE A SMOKE STUDY INDICATING |
| | THE AREAS PER FLOOR TO BE CONSIDERED |
| | ATRIUM, THE TOTAL AREA AND HEIGHT OF THE |
| | ATRIUM. |
| | * PROVIDE CALS FOR EXHAUST AIR AND |
| | FOR THE FRESH AIR INTAKE. |
| | * PROVIDE INFORMATION PER FLOOR HOW |
| | SMOKE WILL BE MANAGED. |
| | *PROVIDE THE WALL LAYOUT INDICATING |
| | THE 1 HR SEPERATION.LS0.03 IS MISSING |
| | THE WALL RATING AT THE RESTROOM WALLS. |
| | * A1.04C THERE IS (4) DOORS WITH NO DESIGNATION. |
| | * LABEL ALL DOORS IN SAID WALL AND |
| | PROVIDE MINUTE RATING. |
| | * INDICATE ON MECH SHEETS WHERE |
| | DAMPERS ARE REQUIED. |
| | * SHEETAC-13 INDICATE SF-34 FOR |
| | THE INTAKE AIR OF THE ATRIUM BUT THE |
| | SCHEDULE INDICATES NOT USED, IS THIS TO |
| | BE DRAFTED AIR? |
| | * ALSO INDICATE ON BOTH THE FIRE |
| | SPRINKLER PLAN & A SHEETS WHERE THE |
| | FIRE WATER CURTAIN IS TO BE PLACED , |
| | PROVIDE THE SPACING OF SPRINKLER HEADS. |
| | |
| | 3) PLEASE CORRECT THE MEP SHEETS TO |
| | DELETE THE TERM MEZZANINE OR PROVIDE |
| | INFORMATION INDICATING COMPLIANCE WHICH |
| | 503.2.3 MEZANINES FOR AREA AND |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH 1005.7.1 FOR EXITING. |
| | |
| | 4) COMMENT# 3 FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW |
| | DEALS WITH THE TERM "TOWNHOUSE" STILL |
| | SHOWING UP IN THE INDEX PAGES FOR THE ARCHITECTURAL & |
| | MEP. THE ABBRIVIATION |
| | "TH" IS NOW FOUND IN THE ARCHITECTURAL |
| | PAGES A1.05 SW/NW. |
| | |
| | 5) COMMENT # 4 FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW, |
| | CONDO UNITS 1-14 (LOFT UNITS) |
| | ARE TO COMPLY WITH FAIR HOUSING MANUAL |
| | REVISED APRIL 1998, PAGE 1.32. BUILDINGS |
| | WITH ONE OR MORE COMMON ENTRANCES TO ALL |
| | DWELLING UNITS IN BUILDINGS WITH ONE OR |
| | MORE ELEVATORS. AT LEAST ONE COMMON |
| | ENTRANCE SHALL BE ON AN ACCESSIBLE |
| | ROUTE. SITE IMPRACTICABILITY TEST DOES |
| | NOT APPLY TO ELEVATORED BUILDINGS. |
| | PROVIDE ON THE LIFE SAFETY PLAN THE |
| | ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM THE ELEVATOR TO |
| | THESE UNITS. |
| | COMMENT 4 & 5 FROM THE FIRST REVIEW |
| | TIE TOGETHER. COMMENT FROM THE PREVIOUS |
| | REVIEW DEALS WITH THESE SAME LOFT UNITS. |
| | IT APPEARS THAT WE AGREE THAT THE LOFT |
| | UNITS WILL NEED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS |
| | FOR FAIR HOUSING ON THE LEVEL THAT YOU |
| | ENTER THE UNIT. THIS IS THE LEVEL 2 |
| | PARKING GARAGE. AS YOU HAVE STATEDTHE |
| | ACCESSIBLE ROUTE STARTS WITH THE VEHICLE |
| | OR PEDESTRIAN ARRIVAL POINT. |
| | ON THIS LEVEL THEY CAN USE THE ELEVATOR |
| | TO ARRIVE AT THE LOFT ENTRY LEVEL OR |
| | THEY COULD DRIVE TO THIS LEVEL. ONCE ON |
| | THIS LEVEL THERE IS TWO PROBLEMS. |
| | THE FIRST IS THERE IS NO ACCESS TO THE |
| | PRIMARY ENTRY OF THE LOFTS THAT MEET |
| | FAIR HOUSING. PROVIDE AN ACCESSIBLE |
| | ROUTE TO THE UNIT.ON THE WEST SIDE OF |
| | THE GARAGE COMMENT #5 AND 23 DEAL WITH |
| | NO ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM THESE UNITS. |
| | THE SECOND ISSUE COMMENT # 5 FROM THE |
| | PREVIOUS REVIEW DELT WITH THE |
| | REQUIREMENT OF AN EXIT ACCESS CORRIDOR |
| | BEING REQUIRED AND THE COMMENT 23 DELT |
| | WITH THE STRIPED SECTION AGAINST THE |
| | WALL COULD NOT EVEN BE USED FOR ACCESS |
| | BECAUSE OF THE COLUMNS PRETRUDING FROM |
| | THE WALL. THERE YOUR RESPONCE WAS THIS |
| | IS NOT A MEANS OF EGRESS NOR AN |
| | ACCESSIBLE PATH !!!!!!! |
| | AGAIN THIS ENTRY POINT TO THE UNIT IS |
| | THE PRIMARY ENTRY SINCE THE ELEVATOR |
| | SERVICES THIS FLOOR SEE FAIR HOUSING |
| | MANUAL. |
| | FIRST REVIEW COMMENNT: 5) THESE UNITS |
| | ARE MISSING EXIT ACCESS |
| | CORRIDORS, DEFINITION: EXIT ACCESS. THAT |
| | PORTION OF A MEANS OF EGRESS WHICH LEADS |
| | TO AN ENTRANCE TO AN EXIT. |
| | SEE MEANS OF EGRESS DEFINITIONS, MEANS |
| | OF EGRESS. A CONTINUOUS AND UNOBSTRUCTED |
| | WAY OF EXIT TRAVEL FROM ANY POINT IN A |
| | BUILDING OR STRUCTURE TO A PUBLIC WAY, |
| | CONSISTING OF THREE SEPARATE AND |
| | DISTINCT PARTS: (1) THE WAY OF EXIT |
| | ACCESS, (2) THE EXIT, AND (3) THE WAY OF |
| | EXIT DISCHARGE. A MEANS OF EGRESS |
| | COMPRISES THE VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL |
| | WAYS OF TRAVEL AND SHALL INCLUDE THE |
| | INTERVENING ROOM SPACE, DOORS, |
| | CORRIDORS, PASSAGEWAYS, BALCONIES, |
| | STAIRS, RAMPS, ENCLOSURES, LOBBIES, |
| | HORIZONTAL EXITS, COURTS AND YARDS. |
| | PROVIDE EXIT ACCESS CORRIDORS FOR |
| | UNITS 1-14 COMPLING WITH TABLE 1004 |
| | TRAVEL DISTANCES FOR R2/ SPRINKLERED |
| | BUILDINGS MAXIMUM TRAVEL DISTANCE OF |
| | 325 FT TO AN EXIT. |
| | |
| | 6) COMMENT 7(G) FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW |
| | DEALS WITH ELEVATORS, STANDBY POWER FOR |
| | ELEVATORS. RESPONCE WAS THAT ALL OF THE |
| | ELEVATORS ARE CONNECTED TO THE STANDBY |
| | POWER BUT ONLY ONE PER SHAFT WILL WORK |
| | AT A TIME WHEN THE GENERATOR IS RUNNING. |
| | WILL THIS SHOW UP ON THE EMERGENCY |
| | POWER, EMERGENCY SYSTEMS CONTROLS AND |
| | STATUS INDICATORS? WILL THERE BE |
| | OVERRIDES SWITTCHES? 412.4.3(8). |
| | |
| | 7) COMMENT# 10(D) FROM THE PREVIOUS |
| | REVIEW, 10D) BOTH SHEETS A1.02NE & |
| | A1.02SE BOTH INDICATE THE USE OF |
| | HORIZONTAL SLIDING DOORS C-0101-C & |
| | C-0101-E, 1012.4(9). |
| | IN APARTMENT BUILDINGS, HOTELS AND |
| | DORMITORIES, HORIZONTAL SLIDING DOORS |
| | SHALL NOT BE USED ACROSS CORRIDORS. |
| | THE ABOVE DOORS ARE IN A EXIT ACCESS |
| | CORRIDOR MAKING THEM PART OF AN EXIT. |
| | SEE DIFINITION OF EXIT COMPOSED OF THREE |
| | PARTS THE EXIT ACCESS CORRIDOR, EXIT & |
| | EXIT DISCHARGE. |
| | |
| | 8) SHEET A1.03 BUSS DUCK CLOSETS DOORS |
| | SWING OVER THE 1/2 OF THE REQUIRED WIDTH |
| | OF THE CORRIDOR. |
| | 1012.1.4 DURING ITS SWING, ANY DOOR IN A |
| | MEANS OF EGRESS SHALL LEAVE |
| | UNOBSTRUCTED AT LEAST ONE HALF OF THE |
| | REQUIRED WIDTH OF AN AISLE,CORRIDOR, PASSAGEWAY, OR |
| | LANDING, NOR PROJECT MORE |
| | THAN 7 IN.(17.8 CM)INTO THE |
| | REQUIRED WIDTH OF AN AISLE, CORRIDOR, |
| | PASSAGEWAY OR LANDING, WHEN FULLY OPEN. |
| | MINIMUM OF 22" CLEAR. |
| | |
| | 9) A1.02 SW / NW PLANS INDICATE EXHAUST |
| | FANS ABOVE IN GARAGE, A2.04 NW |
| | ELEVATION, THE BOTTOM FLOOR WINDOWS ARE |
| | NOT MAARKED AS TO TYPE? ARE THEY FIXED ? |
| | EXHAUST FROM GARAGE TO BE A MINIMUM OF |
| | 10 FT FROM OPENINGS SEE M401. |
| | |
| | 10) A2.04 WINDOW # 4 NOTE INDICATES FIRE |
| | RATED WHERE IS THE WINDOW SCHEDULE |
| | INDICATING HR / MIN RATING? |
| | |
| | 11) A1.04 AT THE NORTH AND SOUTH END OF |
| | THE PARKING GARAGE THERE AREAS FENCED |
| | OFF FOR INTAKE AND EXHAUST AIR, PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE SIGNAGE "NO STORAGE". |
| | |
| | 12) A1.04SW POOL EQUIPMENT, PROVIDE HOW |
| | CHORINE WILL BESTORED FOR POOL, LIQUID |
| | OR GAS FORM, QUANITY? THIS AREA WILL BE |
| | CLASSIFIED AS A H-4 (308.2)OCCUPANCY |
| | UNTIL FURTHER INFORMATION IS REVIEWED. |
| | |
| | 13) SHEET A1.05.NE ELEVATOR# 7 PLEASE |
| | IDENTIFY OBJECT NEXXT TO THE ELEVATORS? |
| | |
| | 14) COMMENT# 26 FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW |
| | A1.05NE UNITS DO NOT HAVE EGRESS TO |
| | STAIR TOWER WITHOUT TRAVEL THROUGH THE |
| | ELEVATOR LOBBIES SEE 412.6.2. THE |
| | BEDROOM TERRACE LEVEL, LOCKABLE DOORS, |
| | 1001.1.3, MEANS OF EGRESS SHALL CONSIST |
| | OF CONTINUOUS AND UNOBSTRUCTED PATHS OF |
| | TRAVEL TO THE EXTERIOR OF A BUILDING. |
| | UNIT 512 OK, UNITS THAT DO NOT COMPLY |
| | 513,514, 515, 516 & 517. |
| | |
| | 15) COMMENT# 28 FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW |
| | A1.05SE UNITS DO NOT HAVE EGRESS TO |
| | STAIRS WITHOUT TRAVEL THROUGH THE |
| | ELEVATOR LOBBY, UNITS 411, 410, 409, 408 |
| | & 404. LOCKABLE DOORS 1001.1.3. |
| | |
| | 16) A1.05NW THE PASSAGEWAY OR EXIT |
| | ACCESS TO THE (2) NORTHWEST EXIT STAIRS |
| | APPEARS TO HAVE A WINDOW FROM UNIT 422 |
| | THAT WOULD REQUIRE A FIRE RATED WINDOW, |
| | POOL DECK BEING A ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY |
| | VERSES R-2 UNIT# 422, REQUIRING A 2HR |
| | WALL AND 1 1/2 HR OPENING PROTECTIVE. |
| | IT APPEARS THAT TO THE UNIT(LOFT)# 14 |
| | THE BLOCK WALL TO THE EXTERIOR OF THE |
| | SUNDECK THIS SHOULD ALSO BE A 2 HR RATED |
| | WALL, PLANS DO NOT PROVIDE THE HEIGHT OF |
| | THIS WALL?SEE TABLE 704 |
| | |
| | 17) COMMENT# 29 FROM THE FIRST REVIEW |
| | INDICATES THAT ON THE POOL DECK LEVEL |
| | TOWER 7&8 WILL ALLOW RE-ENTRY. THE |
| | DOOR IN STAIR# 14 (POOL DECK) SWINGS THE |
| | WRONG WAY.WILL THIS ALLOW RE-ENTRY? THE |
| | OTHER STAIR ON THE POOL DECK THAT |
| | APPEARS TO ALLOW RENTRY IS STAIR# 9 WILL |
| | THIS ALLOW REENTRY? STAIR #9 ALSO HAS AN |
| | ALLOWABLE OCCUPANT LOAD OF 200 INDICATED |
| | ON THE LIFE SAFETY PLAN, BUT THE DOOR |
| | WILL ONLY ALLOW 170. WHERE WILL THE |
| | ADDITIONAL LOADING BE MADE UP? SEE |
| | COMMENT# 21. 1010.1.2 THERE SHALL BE NO |
| | REDUCTION OF WIDTH IN THE DIRECTION OF |
| | TRAVEL.WILL THESE DOORS ALLOW RE-ENTRY |
| | BACK INTO THE STAIRWELL? YOUR REPLY |
| | INDICATED TOWER 7&8? |
| | |
| | 18A) COMMENT# 16 FROM THE FIRST REVIEW, |
| | A1.04C THERE IS A TRUE ISSUE OF THE |
| | ATRIUM VERSUS THE ELEVATOR LOBBY.BY |
| | DEFINITION, ATRIUM. A SPACE, INTENDED |
| | FOR OCCUPANCY WITHIN A BUILDING, |
| | EXTENDING VERTICALLY THROUGH THE |
| | BUILDING AND ENCLOSED AT THE TOP.SINCE |
| | THE 3RD FLOOR IS ENCLOSED BY GLASS, THIS |
| | TRUELY MAKES A SHAFT SEPERATING IT FROM |
| | THE REST OF THE BUILDING. |
| | SINCE THIS IS A HIGH RISE, AND THE |
| | SHAFT SEPERATES THIS AREA REMOVING THE |
| | ATRIUM THEORY,412.6.1 CAN NOT TAKE THE |
| | EXEMPTION FOR ATRIUMS MAKING AN ELEVATOR |
| | LOBBY REQUIRED FOR FLOORS 2,3 & 4. |
| | THE RESPONCE DOCUMENTS STATE THAT |
| | "GLASS HAS BEEN REMOVED AND PARTITION |
| | HAS BEEN ADDED TO MEET THE DEFINITION OF |
| | THE ATRIUM REQUIREMENT & TO ELIMINATE |
| | THE SHAFT CRITERIA." |
| | 18A)(1)SHEET A1.04C STILL INDICATES A |
| | GLASS ENCLOSURE AROUND THE ATRIUM SHAFT. 18A)(2)THE |
| | PLANS ALSO INDICATE A PAIR OF |
| | SWING GLASS FRAMELESS DOORS TO BE |
| | INSTALLED, WITH A 45 MIN RATING PROVIDE |
| | MORE DETAILS.HOW WILL THE DOORS SEAL |
| | AGAINST SMOKE? |
| | 18A)(3) THERE IS FOUR DOORS ON THIS |
| | SHEET NOT LABELED. |
| | 18B) SMOKE CONTROL FOR THE ATRIUM, THE |
| | MECHANICAL PLANS SHEET AC-13 ONLY SHOWS |
| | THE FRESH AIR INTAKE THROUGH A PLENUM |
| | MOTER SF-34 NOT USED, AC- 14 SHOW THE |
| | EXHAUST MOTOR SF-36. THIS IS THE ONLY |
| | INFORMATION PROVIDED, AS STATED EARLIER |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE THE DOCUMENTATION AS |
| | REQUESTED UNDER 2B. |
| | 18C) PLEASE PROVIDE AREA CALCULATIONS |
| | FOR THE FIRST FLOOR OF THE ATRIUM AND |
| | THE MEZZANINE LEVEL 503.2.3.2.SPACES |
| | ENCLOSED BENEATH THE MEZZANINE CAN NOT |
| | BE TAKEN INTO THE THE 1/3RD AREA TO BE |
| | THE MEZZANINE. |
| | 18D) MEZZANINE LEVEL MUST MEET THE |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF 1005.7.3 THE SPACE |
| | BENEATH THE MEZZANINE MAY BE ENCLOSED |
| | PROVIDED THE ENCLOSED SPACE IS |
| | PROTECTED THROUGHOUT WITH A SMOKE |
| | DETECTION SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA |
| | 72 WHICH SOUNDS AN ALARM IN THE |
| | MEZZANINE. |
| | |
| | 19) COMMENT# 26 FROM THE PREVIOUS |
| | REVIEWA1.05NE UNITS DO NOT HAVE EGRESS |
| | TO STAIR TOWER WITH OUT TRAVEL THROUGH |
| | THE ELEVATOR LOBBY SEE 412.6.2. THE |
| | BEDROOM TERRACE LEVEL IS A PROBLEM, |
| | SINCE 1001.1.3 REQUIRES TRAVEL TO BE |
| | CONTINIOUS AND UNOBSTRUCTED PATH OF |
| | TRAVEL. BEDROOM DOORS ARE LOCKABLE |
| | DOOR.UNITSTHAT DO NOT COMPLY ARE |
| | 513,514,515,516 & 517. |
| | |
| | 20) COMMENT# 28 FROM THE PREVIOUS |
| | REVIEW SHEET A1.05SE UNITS DO NOT HAVE |
| | TRAVEL THROUGH THE ELEVATOR LOBBY ARE |
| | 411,410,409, 408 & 404. SEE 412.6.2 & |
| | 1001.1.3. |
| | |
| | 21) SHEET LS0.05 LIFE SAFETY POOL DECK |
| | SHEET INDICATES THE VARIOUS STAIRWELLS |
| | AND THE OCCUPANT LOAD THAT EACH |
| | STAIRWELL CAN HANDLE. |
| | |
| | 21A) PLANS (LS0.05) INDICATE THAT |
| | STAIRWELL# 10-13 EACH WILL ACCOMADATE |
| | 240X4= 960 OCCUPANT LOAD FOR THESE (4) |
| | STAIRS. THE A1.05SW & A1.05NWINDICATE |
| | THE CORRESONDING ENTRY DOORS AS |
| | 401,402,417 AND 418 AS 3'-0" DOORWAYS |
| | WITH AN ALLOWABLE LOAD OF 34"/.2=170 PER |
| | DOORWAY, 170X4=680 OCCUPANT LOAD AT THE |
| | DOORWAYS.PLEASE REVISE THE LOADS ON |
| | THE LIFE SAFETY SHEET AND INDICATE HOW |
| | THE ADDITIONAL LOADS WILL BE MADE UP? |
| | ALSO CORRECT FIGURES FOR STAIR 9 & 14. |
| | |
| | 21B) PLANS (LS0.05) ALSO INDICATETHAT |
| | STAIRWELLS# 10-13 WILL CARRY AN |
| | OCCUPAANT LOAD OF 240 FOR EACH STAIROR A |
| | TOTAL OF 960 FOR THESE 4 STAIR TOWERS. |
| | TABLE 1004 FOOTNOTE 14 ALLOWS .3 TO BE |
| | USED DIVIDED INTO THE STAIR WIDTH OF 60" |
| | |
| | 60/.3= 200 OCC LOAD X 4 STAIRS= 800 NOT |
| | THE 960 INDICATED ON THE LIFE SAFETY |
| | PLAN. ALSO CORRECT THE FIGURES FOR STAIR |
| | 9 & 14. |
| | |
| | 21C) DEPENDING ON THE DESIGNERS DECISION |
| | OF HOW TO CORRECT THE PROBLEM OFBOTTLE |
| | NECKING, FOLLOW THROUGH THE EXIT TO THE |
| | EXIT DISCHARGE TO SEE THAT THIS PROBLEM |
| | WILL NOT REOCCUR? SEE DOORWAYS AT THE |
| | BOTTOM OF THE STAIR. |
| | |
| | |
| | 21) COMMENT# 33A) FROM THE PREVIOUS |
| | REVIEW,A1.06NE THIS COMMENT WILL |
| | EFFECT MOST OF THE STAIRWELL, (EXITS) |
| | WITHIN THE BUILDING. THE PLANS INDICATE |
| | A EXIT DOOR THAT LEADS DIRECTLY FROM THE |
| | CONDO UNIT INTO THE SMOKEPROOF EXIT |
| | ENCLOSURE. |
| | THE INTENT IS TO HAVE AN EXIT THAT |
| | DOESN'T TRAVEL THROUGH THE ELEVATOR |
| | LOBBY.THE CODE SECTION THAT DOESN'T |
| | ALLOW ROOMS TO EMPTY DIRECTLY INTO THE |
| | EXIT IS: |
| | 1005.6.7 ACCESS TO THE STAIRWAY SHALL BE |
| | BY WAY OF A VESTIBULE OR BY WAY OF AN |
| | OPEN EXTERIOR BALCONY OF NONCOMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS. |
| | EXCEPTION: ACCESS BY WAY OF A |
| | VESTIBULE WHEN THE STAIRWAY MEETS THE |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF 1005.6.9.2 (1-3), |
| | 1005.6.9.9 AND 1005.6.9.10 & IS LOCATED |
| | IN A FULLY SPRINKLEREDBUILDING. |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH THE THREE CODE |
| | REFRENCES STATED ABOVE WILL ALLOW DIRECT |
| | ENTRY TO THE STAIRWELL WITHOUT A |
| | VESTIBLE. |
| | 1) 1005.6.9.2 DEALS WITH STAIRWELL PRESSURIZATION, |
| | WHICH IS INDICATED ON |
| | THE PLANS, |
| | 2) 1005.6.9.10 IS THE REQUIEMENT FOR |
| | REQUIRED SMOKE DETECTORS THAT WOULD BE |
| | USUALLY IN THE VESTIBULE, BUT IT WOULD |
| | BE IN THE STAIR TOWER IF THE DOOR FROM |
| | THE UNIT IS OPEN ALLOWING SMOKE TO ENTER |
| | THE STAIR TOWER. THE SMOKE DETECTOR IS |
| | TO BE PLACED IN THE UNITIF ACTIVATED TO |
| | SHUT DOWN THE INDIVIDUAL UNIT AND |
| | ACTIVATING ALL SMOKE EVACUATION SYSTEMS |
| | IN THE STAIR TOWER. NO SMOKE DETECTORS |
| | ARE SHOWN ON THE ELECTRICAL SHEETS. |
| | 3) 1005.6.9.9 EXHAUST AIR, A MINIMUM |
| | OF 2,500 CFM THROUGH A DAMPERED RELIEF |
| | OR AN EXHAUST FAN AT THE TOP OF THE |
| | STAIR SHAFT. |
| | SHEET AC31 INDICATES ONLY GOOSENECKS |
| | ON STAIR TOWER 5,8,9/ 6,7& 10. |
| | NO RELIEF DAMPER DAMPER SHOWN, AC-28 |
| | FAN SCHEDULE IS MISSING SF 4,6 & 10. |
| | STAIRDETAIL 4,11 & 13 IS MISSING THE |
| | GOOSENECK, IT APPEARS THAT STAIRS 3,12 & |
| | 14 ARE EXHAUSTING AIR INTO SOME ROOM? |
| | THERE IS A DESCREPANCY BETWEEN HOW |
| | THE DESIGN TEAMS ARE LISTING THE |
| | STAIRWELLS. SONG AND FES ARE NOT USING |
| | THE SAME IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM FOR |
| | STAIRWWELLS, CORRECT SO IF WE ARE |
| | LOOKING FOR A STAIRWELL ON ARCHITECTUALS |
| | THE SAME NOMENCLATURE WILL BE USED ON |
| | THE FES PLAN. |
| | |
| | 22) COMMENT# 33B) THIS IS A COMMENT THAT |
| | IS BKOKEN OUT FROM THE FIRST REVIEW. |
| | A1.08NE AS IS SHOWN ON THE PLAN IS CODE |
| | COMPLIANT, BUT A DOOR COULD EASLY BE |
| | INSTALLED CREATING A SECOND BEDROOM AND |
| | VIOLATION 2ND MEANS OF EGRESS BLOCKED |
| | BECAUSE OF LOCKABLE DOORS. 1001.1.3. |
| | |
| | 23) PLANS DO NOT INDICATE COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH 1012.1.11EVERY DOOR IN A STAIR |
| | ENCLOSURE SERVING MORE THAN FOUR STORIES |
| | SHALL PERMIT RE-ENTRY FROM THE STAIR |
| | ENCLOSURE TO THE INTERIOR OF THE |
| | BUILDING, OR AN AUTOMATIC RELEASE SHALL |
| | BE PROVIDED TO UNLOCK ALL STAIR |
| | ENCLOSURE DOORS TO PERMIT RE-ENTRY. |
| | SUCH AUTOMATIC RELEASE SHALL BE |
| | ACTUATED WITH THE INITIATION OF THE |
| | BUILDING FIRE ALARM, FIRE DETECTION OR |
| | FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM.THE DOOR SCHEDULE |
| | SHOWS NO SUCH DEVICES. |
| | |
| | 24)COMMENT # 57 FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW |
| | 412.8.1 ALL STAIRWAY DOORS WHICH ARE |
| | TO BE LOCKED FROM THE STAIRWAY SIDE |
| | SHALL HAVE THE CAPABILITY OF BEING |
| | UNLOCKED SIMULTANEOUSLY WITHOUT |
| | UNLATCHING UPON A SIGNAL FROM THE |
| | CENTRAL CONTROL STATION.THE DOORS |
| | SHALL BE SIMILARLY UNLOCKED UPON |
| | ACTIVATION OF THE SPRINKLER SYSTEM OR |
| | UPON POWER FAILURE.RESPONCE : NO DOORS |
| | AT ANY STAIRWELLS ARE SCHEDULED TO BE |
| | LOCKED FROM WITHIN THE BUILDING AND ONLY |
| | DOORS FROM THE OUTSIDE ARE DESIGNED WITH |
| | NO ACCESS EXCEPT KNOX BOXES ARE |
| | SCHEDULED AT EACH EXTERIOR DOOR FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| | ACCESS. |
| | IF THIS ISTRUE THIS MEANS YOU WILL |
| | BE ABLE TO TRAVEL FROM FLOOR TO FLOOR |
| | AND INTO EACH INDIVIDUAL UNIT OF THE |
| | STAIR TOWER SINCE THERE IS NO PLAN FOR |
| | A VESTIBULE? |
| | |
| | THE SECOND HALF OF THIS COMMENT WAS |
| | NEVER ADDRESSED. |
| | 412.8.2 TELEPHONE OR OTHER TWO-WAY COMMUNICATIONS |
| | SYSTEMS CONNECTED TO AN |
| | APPROVED EMERGENCY SERVICE WHICH |
| | OPERATES CONTINUOUSLY SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED AT NOT LESS THAN EVERY FIFTH |
| | FLOOR IN EACH REQUIRED STAIRWAYWHERE |
| | OTHER PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE PERMIT THE |
| | DOORS TO BE LOCKED. |
| | |
| | 25) COMMENT# 61 FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW |
| | DEALS WITH HDS (HIGH DENSITY FOAM) |
| | PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, TESTING |
| | REPORT WHERE THIS PRODUCT MEETS THE |
| | EXCEPTION OF 707.1 |
| | |
| | 26) A6.01 DETAIL# 2 EPS FOAM CORE |
| | ARCHITECTURAL TRIM, SEE 1404.1.1 |
| | ARCHITECTURAL TRIM ON BUILDINGS OF TYPE |
| | I, II AND IVCONSTRUCTION NOT MORE |
| | THAN THREE STORIES OR 40 FT (12.2 M) |
| | HIGH MAY BE OFTYPE VI CONSTRUCTION, |
| | AND MAY BE OF TYPE VI CONSTRUCTION ON |
| | ALL BUILDINGSOF TYPE III, V AND VI CONSTRUCTION. |
| | TRIM SHALL BE SECURED TO |
| | THE WALLWITH METAL OR OTHER APPROVED |
| | BRACKETS OR FASTENERS.WHEN |
| | ARCHITECTURALTRIM IS LOCATED ALONG |
| | THE TOP OF EXTERIOR WALLS, IT SHALL BE |
| | COMPLETELYBACKED BY THE EXTERIOR WALL |
| | AND SHALL NOT EXTEND OVER THE TOP OF |
| | EXTERIOR WALLS. |
| | |
| | 27) A6.01 DETAIL# 3, THE RAILING DETAIL |
| | FROM THE STUCCO FINISH TO THE BOTTOM OF |
| | THE GLASS RAIL IS TO BE UNDER 4" NOT A |
| | MAXIMUM OF 4", A 4" SPHERE IS TO REJECT |
| | PASSING THROUGH. 1015.3 OPENINGS. OPEN |
| | GUARDRAILS SHALL HAVE INTERMEDIATE RAILS |
| | OR ORNAMENTAL PATTERN SUCH THAT A 4-INCH |
| | (102 MM) DIAMETER SPHERE CANNOT PASS |
| | THROUGH ANY OPENING UP TO A HEIGHT OF 34 |
| | INCHES.A BOTTOM RAIL OR CURB |
| | SHALL BE PROVIDED THAT WILL REJECT THE |
| | PASSAGE OF 2-INCH (51 MM) DIAMETER |
| | SPHERE. |
| | |
| | 28) SHEET A0.05 |
| | 28A) THE VARIOUS FLOOR LEVELS 1-4 DO NOT |
| | SHOW ANY OF THE INTERIOR WALL RATINGS ON |
| | THE FULL FLOOR LAYOUT OR THE NE, C, SE, |
| | SW, P, OR NW SHEETS. |
| | 28B) FOR LEVELS 5-17 THE INTERIOR |
| | PARTITIONS (P1-P6) ARE SHOWN BUT NOT THE |
| | WALL HOUR FIRE RATING AS DEPICTED IN THE |
| | LEGEND " WALL TYPE SSYMBOL LEGEND". |
| | PLEASE CORRECT AND INDICATE THE WALL |
| | HOUR FIRE RATING. |
| | 28C) PLANS INDICATE C-1 APPEAR TO BE 2HR |
| | WHILE C-2 APPEARS TO BE 1 HR, PROVIDE |
| | FIRE RATING,THE PLAN INDICATES USE OF |
| | 3 5/8" STUDS WHERE AS UL 420 DEPICTS 1 |
| | 5/8" STUDS, PLEASE CORRECT. |
| | 28D) WALL TYPE C-3 REFERS TO FBC 209.1 |
| | CHAPTER 2 DEFINITIONS ONLY GOES TO 202? |
| | PROVIDE U L LISTING FOR WALL ASEMBLY. |
| | 28E) SAME COMMENT BUT REFERING TO WALL |
| | TYPE W1 & W2 PLEASE PROVIDE UL LISTING. |
| | 28F)C-5 - C-8 ALL INDICATE THE USE OF |
| | C-H OR I STUDS WHILE THE UL LISTING |
| | PROVIDEDUNDER THE HEADING STEEL STUDS |
| | ONLY INDICATES THE USE OF C-H STUDS, |
| | PLEASE CORRECT. |
| | 28G) CORRECT C-7 HEADING 2HR RATED SHAFT |
| | BUT REFRENCES 2 UL LISTINGS, UL 467 IS 2 |
| | HR, DELETE UL 469 OR NEW HEADING FOR 1 |
| | HR SEE C-8 1 HR RATING. |
| | 28H) CONTROL JOINT DETAIL PROVIDE THE UL |
| | LISTING FOR 1& 2 HR RATED WALLS. |
| | |
| | 29) A0.06 |
| | 29A) COULD NOT LOCATE THE UL J973 ? |
| | |
| | 30)A5.01DETAIL 03. WALL C-4 INDICATES |
| | 2 HR RATING WHEREAS A0.05 C4 DOESN'T |
| | INDICATE THE UL WALL RATING OR PROVIDE |
| | FROM THE BLOCK MANUFACTURER THE |
| | EQUIVALENT THICKNESS FOR THE RATED BLOCK |
| | TO BE USED. TABLE 709.3.1 |
| | |
| | 31) A5.02 DETAIL# 1 AHU LEFTSIDE OF PAGE |
| | MATCH A1.05 NE BUT NOT THE A/C04 |
| | INDICATES ACCESS FOR THE A/C UNIT |
| | THROUGH THE ELEVATOR LOBBY, PLEASE |
| | CORRECT. |
| | |
| | 32)COMMENT# 40 FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW, |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH PERMIT APPLICATION |
| | AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003 ARE |
| | REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR INFORMATION |
| | PLEASE SEE THE STATE WEBSITE AT |
| | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. PRODUCTS WITH |
| | STATEWIDE APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE |
| | SUBMITTED WITH A COVER SHEET THAT LISTS |
| | THE PRODUCT IDENTITY NUMBER FROM THE |
| | STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT HAVE |
| | STATEWIDE APPROVAL, SUBMIT AN APPLICA- |
| | TION FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OR SITE |
| | SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE 9B-72. SEE |
| | ATTACHMENT. WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG |
| | |
| | 33)COMMENT# 41 FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW, |
| | 41) FL BLD CODE 1606.1.5: COMPONENTS & |
| | CLADDING, PROVIDE 2 COPIES(3 IF THRESH- |
| | OLD OR RESIDENT INSPECTOR) OF PRODUCT |
| | TESTING REPORTS,MISSING REPORTS ARE AS |
| | FOLLOWS: |
| | A) WINDOWS FIXED, STOREFRONT, OPERTABLE |
| | PASS THROUGHS OR GLASS BLOCK, MULLIONS |
| | A1) PROVIDE A WINDOW SCHEDULE THAT |
| | WILL CORRALATE TO WINDOW TYPES |
| | FOUND ON A7.13-16 |
| | A2) NO REPORT FOR STOREFRONT |
| | A3)CASEMENT WINDOWS A2.03 HAS ZONES AS |
| | |
| | HIGH AS 95 & 105 BUT THE ELEVATIONS |
| | DO NOT INDICATE WHAT TYPE OF |
| | WINDOWS THESE ARE. THE SECOND ISSUE |
| | WILL BE THE REPORT SUBMITTED IS FOR |
| | LARGE MISSLE IMPACT GLAZING, WILL |
| | ALL THE CASEMENT WINDOWS SUPPLIED |
| | BE LARGE MISSLE SMALL MISSLE AND OR |
| | ONLY RATED FOR WIND DEPENDING ON |
| | THE LOCATION FROM GRADE? |
| | B) EXTERIOR DOORS, SOLID, SWING, GLAZED |
| | SLIDERS ROLL UP |
| | B1)NO REPORTS WERE SUBMITTED FOR SOLID |
| | CORE DOORS |
| | C) MULLIONS BOTH VERTICAL & HORIZONTAL |
| | D) SKYLIGHTS- 2 SEPERATE SKYLIGHT |
| | REPORTS WERE SUBMITTED, PARAMOUNT |
| | SKYLIGHT REPORT IS FOR RIDGE TYPE |
| | SIMPLE SKYLIGHT, PROVIDE WHERE THIS |
| | IS TO BE USED. |
| | SUPER SKY LIGHT PRODUCTS ALSO HAS |
| | LIMITATIONS IN MAXIMUM LIGHT SIZE OF |
| | |
| | 30 SQ FT LITE SIZE, CONFIGURATIONS |
| | SHOWN ON SHEET B OF 7 AND DESIGN |
| | PRESSURE. A2.01 THE GLASS ENCLOSURE |
| | INDICATES PRESSURES OF +/-105. THIS |
| | SKYLIGHT WILL REQUIRE SITE SPECIFIC |
| | ENGINEERING !!!!!!!!!!!!! |
| | E) EXTERIOR VENTS OR LOUVERS |
| | NO PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED |
| | F) EXTERIOR GUARDRAILS |
| | NO PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED |
| | G) PANEL WALL SYSTEMS: SOFFITS, EFIS |
| | SYSTEMS, DENSEGLASS |
| | H) ROOFING PRODUCTS/ ASSEMBLIES |
| | THIS ROOF IS MISSING OR NOT IN |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOW ITEMS: |
| | |
| | _X__ CONTRACTOR DID NOT PROVIDE THE MEAN |
| | |
| | ROOF HEIGHT. |
| | |
| | _X__ CONTRACTOR DID NOT INDICATE THE |
| | ROOF PITCH. |
| | |
| | _X__ CONTRACTOR FAILED TO INDICATE WHICH |
| | SYSTEM TO BE USED. |
| | |
| | _X__ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED HAS A LOW |
| | PRESSURE FOR ZONE _3__ . |
| | |
| | _X__ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED STATES |
| | LIMITATION# 7, SHOULD THE FASTENER |
| | RESISTANCE BE LESS THAN THAT |
| | REQUIRED, AS DETERMINED BY THE |
| | BUILDING OFFICIAL, A REVISED |
| | FASTENER SPACING, PREPARED , SIGNED |
| | AND SEALED BY A FLORIDA REGISTERED |
| | PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, REGISTERED |
| | ARCHITECT OR REGISTERED ROOF |
| | CONSULTANT MAY BE SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | ___THE SYSTEM PROVIDED INDICATES |
| | LIMITATION# 9, NO ENHANCED |
| | FASTENING ALLOWED. |
| | |
| | 34)COMMENT# 37 FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW, |
| | WILL REQUIRE THIS INFORMATION BEFORE |
| | ISSUANCE OF PERMIT: |
| | A3.04A/ A3.05A INDICATES A |
| | STRUCTURAL STEEL AND GLASS SKYLIGHT TO |
| | BE USED SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH: |
| | 34 A)13-104.4.5 FENESTRATION ENERGY |
| | RATING LABELS. ENERGY PERFORMANCE VALUES |
| | (I.E.,U-FACTOR, SOLAR HEAT GAIN |
| | COEFFICIENT) OF FENESTRATION PRODUCTS |
| | (I.E., WINDOWS, DOORS AND SKYLIGHTS) |
| | SHALL BE DETERMINED BY AN ACCREDITED, IN |
| | DEPENDENT LABORATORY AND LABELED AND |
| | CERTIFIED BY THE MANUFACTURER. |
| | 34B) 1604.3 CONCENTRATED FLOOR LIVE |
| | LOADS SKYLIGHT RIBS 200 LBS |
| | 34C) MUST MEET SMALL MISSLE IMPACT |
| | TESTING 30'-60' FROM THE GROUND. |
| | 34D) 1707.4.2.1.1 TEST AND LABELING OF |
| | SKYLIGHTS. EXTERIOR SKYLIGHTS SHALL BE |
| | TESTED BY AN APPROVED INDEPENDENT |
| | TESTING LABORATORY, AND SHALL BE LABELED |
| | WITH AN APPROVED LABEL IDENTIFYING THE MANUFACTURER, |
| | PERFORMANCE |
| | CHARACTERISTICS AND APPROVED PRODUCT |
| | EVALUATION ENTITY TO INDICATE COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICATION: |
| | AAMA/WDMA 1600/IS7, |
| | VOLUNTARY SPECIFICATION FOR SKYLIGHTS OR |
| | TAS 202 (HVHZ SHALL COMPLY WITH TAS 202) 34E)2405.3.2 |
| | SLOPED GLAZING.GLASS |
| | SLOPED MORE THAN 15 DEGREES (0.26 RAD) |
| | FROM VERTICAL IN SKYLIGHTS, SUNSPACES, |
| | SLOPED ROOFS AND OTHER EXTERIOR |
| | APPLICATIONS SHALL BE CHOSEN TO RESIST |
| | THE APPLICABLE LOADS FOR COMPONENTS |
| | AND CLADDING.THE ALLOWABLE COMBINED |
| | LOAD FOR THE GLASS SHALL BE DETERMINED |
| | IN ACCORDANCE WITH 2405.3.2.1 THROUGH |
| | 2405.3.2.3. |
| | |
| | 35) COMMENT # 38FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW |
| | PROVIDE DETAILS FROM THE PRE-CAST |
| | SPECIALTY ENGINEER HOW SYSTEM ISTO BE |
| | ASSEMBLED. WHAT TYPE MATERIAL IS TO BE |
| | USED, FORCES TO BE RESISTED, UPLIFT, |
| | LATERAL LOADS AND GRAVITY LOADS.WILL |
| | REQUIRE THIS INFORMATION BEFORE ISSUANCE |
| | OF THIS PERMIT. |
| | |
| | 36)COMMENT# 49 FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW, |
| | A6.01 RAILING DETAIL INDICATES TWO |
| | INCHES CLEAR FROM THE BOTTOM RAIL TO THE DECK.1015.3 |
| | OPENINGS. A BOTTOM RAIL OR |
| | CURB SHALL BE PROVIDED THAT WILL REJECT |
| | THE PASSAGE OF 2-INCH (51 MM) DIAMETER |
| | SPHERE.THIS CODE SECTION REQUIRES |
| | REJECTION OF A 2" SPHERE, REQUIRING THE |
| | OPENING TO BE LESS THAN 2". |
| | |
| | 37)COMMENT# 50 FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW, |
| | 50) A6.06 MAIN GLASS CANOPY, PROVIDE |
| | INFORMATION ON THE CANOPY SYSTEM. ALSO |
| | PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE GLAZING |
| | SYSTEM INDICATING COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | 2407.2.1 ALLOWABLE GLAZING MATERIALS. |
| | THIS SYSTEM SHALL ALSO BE AN ENGINEERED |
| | SYSTEM. IT DOESN,T FIT THE PARAMETERS OF |
| | THE PRODUCT APPROVAL UNDER RULE 9-B, THE |
| | |
| | CANOPY DESIGN WILL BE SITE SPECIFIC. SEE |
| | "FLORIDA.BUILDING.ORG" FOR REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | 38)COMMENT# 54 FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW |
| | P-2 INDICATES PLUMBING IN THE EXIT |
| | TOWERS, TOWER 5 STAIR A, TOWER8 STAIR A. 1006.1.3.1 |
| | PENETRATIONS INTO OPENINGS |
| | THROUGH A STAIRWAY ENCLOSURE ASSEMBLY |
| | ARE PROHIBITED EXCEPT FOR REQUIRED EXIT |
| | DOORS, DUCTWORK AND EQUIPMENT NECESSARY |
| | FOR INDEPENDENT STAIR PRESSURIZATION, |
| | SPRINKLER PIPING, STANDPIPES AND |
| | ELECTRICAL CONDUIT SERVING THE |
| | STAIRWAY AND TERMINATING AT A STEEL BOX |
| | NOT EXCEEDING 16 SQ IN. (0.010 M^2). |
| | SUCH PENETRATIONS SHALL BE PROTECTED IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH ?705.4.THERE SHALL BE NO PENETRATIONS |
| | OR COMMUNICATING OPENINGS, |
| | WHETHER PROTECTED OR NOT, BETWEEN |
| | ADJACENT STAIR ENCLOSURES. |
| | EXIT STAIRWAYS ARE RATED SHAFTS THAT |
| | ARE VERTICAL OPENINGS EXTENDING THROUGH |
| | ONE OR MORE STORIES IN A BUILDING. |
| | STORY: THAT PORTION OF A BUILDING |
| | INCLUDED BETWEEN THE UPPER SURFACE OF |
| | THE FLOOR AND THE UPPER SURFACE OF THE |
| | NEXT FLOOR OR ROOF ABOVE. NO SOFFITS |
| | SHALL BE BUILT INTO THESE AREAS OF |
| | SHAFTS EVEN IF YOU RATE THEM FOR 2 HRS. |
| | THERE IS TO BE NO PENETRATIONS INTO |
| | STAIRWAY ENCLOSURES EXECT FOR THOSE |
| | REQUIRED FOR REQUIRED EXIT DOORS, |
| | DUCTWORK, EQUIPMENT REQUIRED FOR |
| | INDEPENDENT STAIR PRESSUREIZATION, |
| | SPRINKLER PIPING, STANDPIPE AND |
| | ELECTRICAL CONDUIT SERVING THE STAIRWAY |
| | . |
| | |
| | 39)BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY |
| | BE ISSUED, IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO |
| | PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL PERMIT |
| | SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT |
| | OFFICE, AND A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT |
| | ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT APPLICATION. |
| | PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE |
| | INFORMATION. |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | JIM WITMER |
| | TEL: (561)805-6715 |
| | FAX: (561)659-8026 |
