| Date |
Text |
| 2005-12-21 00:00:00 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001 |
| | FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS |
| | TO THE FBC2001 |
| | |
| | COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEWS, |
| | NUMBERING TO REMAIN THE SAME FOR |
| | CONSISTENCY.MISSING NUMBERS INDICATE |
| | COMMENTS WHICH WERE ADDRESSED CORRECTLY. |
| | |
| | 2.)IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM |
| | BEACH COUNTY.THE PLANS MUST BE STAMPED |
| | AND THE RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE |
| | APPLICATION. 233-5025 FOR MORE |
| | INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | 9.)(SECOND REVIEW) . . . THE CALCS |
| | REFER TO THE 2003 FBC, GOVERNING CODE IS |
| | FBC2001. |
| | |
| | (THIRD REVIEW)GOVERNING CODE STILL |
| | STATES 2003 FBC.PLEASE REVISE. |
| | |
| | 11.)HURRICANE SHUTTER STORAGE IS SHOWN |
| | ON THE PLAN (TIRE STORAGE AREA).SEE |
| | ATTACHED IMPLEMENTATION STANDARD FOR |
| | HURRICANE MISSILE IMPACT PROTECTION, |
| | ITEM #13.SUBMIT A PLAN FOR |
| | INSTALLATION FOR REVIEW. |
| | |
| | (SECOND REVIEW) NOT ADDRESSED.USE OF |
| | REMOVABLE SHUTTERS AND THE INSTALLATION |
| | PLAN IS TO BE APPROVED BY THE BUILDING |
| | OFFICIAL. |
| | |
| | (THIRD REVIEW) RESPONSE LETTER PROVIDED |
| | SOME INFORMATION IN REGARDS TO SHUTTER |
| | INSTALLATION.THIS IS NOT AN |
| | INSTALLATION PLAN.PLEASE PROVIDE A |
| | PLAN AS REQUESTED WITH ALL NECESSARY |
| | INFORMATION TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| | POLICY AND SUBMIT.THIS PLAN WILL BE |
| | REVIEWED FOR COMPLETENESS PRIOR TO |
| | SUBMITTAL TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, WHO |
| | WILL MAKE DETERMINATION AS TO WHETHER OR |
| | NOT APPROVAL IS GRANTED.THE PLAN IS TO |
| | BE APPROVED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE OR |
| | THE PLAN IS TO BE REVISED FOR IMPACT |
| | GLASS. |
| | |
| | 12.)SEE PROCEDURES, ITEM I, ON THE |
| | ATTACHED STANDARD IN REGARDS TO REQUIRED |
| | INFORMATION.A FORM IS ATTACHED FOR |
| | YOUR CONVENIENCE. |
| | |
| | (SECOND REVIEW)NOT ADDRESSED.FORM |
| | WAS RETURNED BLANK. |
| | |
| | (THIRD REVIEW)THIS CANNOT BE ISSUED AS |
| | SUBMITTED UNTIL AN INSTALLATION PLAN HAS |
| | BEEN APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. |
| | |
| | 13.)ONLY ONE ACCESSIBLE EXIT IS SHOWN |
| | FROM THE SERVICE AREA AND THE TIRE |
| | STORAGE FBC11-4.11(3), FBC1004.2.2. |
| | |
| | (SECOND REVIEW) SAME PLANS PROVIDED. |
| | NOTE THAT EXIT 2HAS A RAMP, EXITS 3 AND |
| | 4 HAVE STEPS.THE RESPONSE LETTER |
| | STATES THAT DOORS 107 AND 108 ARE |
| | ACCESSIBLE EGRESS DOORS. DOOR 107 IS AN |
| | INTERIOR DOOR, IS NOT AN EXIT.DOOR 108 |
| | HAS A STEP DOWN, NOT AN ACCESSIBLE EXIT. |
| | |
| | (THIRD REVIEW)THE RESPONSE LETTER |
| | STATES THAT DOORS 101, 107 AND 110 ARE |
| | ACCESSIBLE EXITS.PLEASE NOTE THE |
| | FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | DOOR 107 IS NOT AN EXIT, IT IS AN |
| | INTERIOR DOOR LEADING TO THE WORK AREA. |
| | SEE FBC CHAPTER 2, DEFINITIONS. |
| | |
| | DOORS 107 AND 110 ARE 40 FEET APART. |
| | THEY DO NOT COMPLY WITH FBC1004.1.4, THE |
| | REQUIREMENT TO BE REMOTELY LOCATED. |
| | |
| | **NOTE - PER ARCHITECT, THE SECOND |
| | ACCESSIBLE EXIT IS TO BE DOOR 108, WHICH |
| | WILL BE REVISED TO ELIMINATE THE DOOR |
| | LANDING.**PLEASE NOTE THAT THE CIVILS |
| | WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE UPDATED AS WELL |
| | TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE |
| | ARCHITECTURALS. |
| | |
| | 14.)PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE SALES |
| | COUNTER, FBC11-7.2. |
| | |
| | THE RESPONSE LETTER INDICATES THAT SHOP |
| | DRAWINGS WILL BE SUBMITTED.THE PERMIT |
| | WILL BE ISSUED WITH THIS AS A PROVISO. |
| | |
| | 16.)FLORIDA STATE OR LOCAL PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS REQUIRED FAC9B72 IN ADDITION |
| | TO EVALUATION OR TEST REPORT.SUBMIT |
| | FOR THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | ROOF, FLAT - OK |
| | ROOF, TILE - OK |
| | EIFS SYSTEM - |
| | OVERHEAD DOOR - DOES NOT MEET DP |
| | METAL DOORS - DOES NOT MEET DP |
| | STOREFRONT - CANNOT BE APPROVED UNTIL |
| | AFTER BUILDING OFFICIAL APPROVES USE OF |
| | REMOVABLE SHUTTERS AND ENGINEER |
| | SPECIFIES DP.INDICATE DP LIMITATION OF |
| | YOUR APPLICATION ON SHEETS 4 AND 5 OF |
| | THE NOA. |
| | |
| | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG |
| | |
| | THE HURRICANE SHUTTER PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | SUBMITTED MUST INCLUDE THE SCHEDULE FOR |
| | INSTALLATION, SEE ITEM 12. |
| | |
| | THE INSTALLATION SPECIFIES THE SAME SIZE |
| | SHUTTER AS THE OPENING SIZE FOR ALL |
| | OPENINGS, DOES NOT STATE IF THEY ARE TO |
| | BE INSTALLED VERTICALLY OR HORIZONTALLY. |
| | |
| | THE SWINGING DOOR DOES NOT MEET THE DP |
| | SPECIFIED ON S-0. |
| | |
| | (SECOND REVIEW)THE PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | FOR THE CLOPAY |
| | OVERHEAD DOORS HAS A DESIGN PRESSURE |
| | LIMITATION OF +37/-42.ALSO STATES ON |
| | THE SPEC SHEET THAT IT IS COMPLIANT FOR |
| | 150MPH EXPOSURE B, YOUR BUILDING HAS |
| | BEEN DECLARED AS EXPOSURE D. |
| | |
| | (THIRD REVIEW)THE NEW PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | SUBMITTED HAS A DP LIMITATION OF |
| | +52/-58, SEE S-0. |
| | |
| | 19.)PROVIDE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR |
| | COMPONENTS AND CLADDING, ROOF. |
| | |
| | (SECOND REVIEW) THIS BUILDING HAS |
| | BEEN DECLARED AS |
| | 150MPH EXPOSURE D DESIGN.THE DESIGN |
| | PRESSURE FOR A FLAT ROOF, ZONE 3, 150, |
| | EXPOSURE B IS -102.2.SEE FBC TABLE |
| | 1606.2B, FBC1606.2D.THE DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES YOU HAVE PROVIDED ON S0, 59 |
| | FOR END ZONES FOR OPENINGS, 68 FOR END |
| | ZONES FOR ROOF, ARE NOT COMPLIANT FOR |
| | 150MPH EXPOSURE D.PLEASE REVISE OR |
| | CLARIFY AS TO HOW YOU HAVE ARRIVED AT |
| | THESE DESIGN PRESSURES. |
| | |
| | (THIRD REVIEW)IT IS STILL NOT CLEAR AS |
| | TO HOW YOU HAVE DETERMINED THE ROOF |
| | CLADDING DESIGN WIND PRESSURES, S0.YOU |
| | HAVE THIS BROKEN DOWN IN SQUARE FOOT |
| | AREAS, LEEWARD AND WINDWARD ZONES.I |
| | BELIEVE THIS MAY APPLY TO THE MWFRS BUT |
| | NOT TO THE ROOF, SEE FBC TABLE 1606.2B, |
| | TABLE 1606.2D, FIGURE 1606.2(C). |
| | REGARDLESS OF HOW YOU DERIVED THE |
| | NUMBERS ON SHEET S0, 105.2 PSF FOR 10SF |
| | OF AREA ROOF ZONE 3 IS NON COMPLIANT FOR |
| | 150MPH EXPOSURE D (-102.2*155=158.41). |
| | |
| | 20.)PROVIDE WIND DESIGN INFORMATION |
| | FBC1606.1.7. |
| | |
| | (SECOND REVIEW) I WAS UNABLE TO LOCATE |
| | THE INFORMATION. |
| | SOME OF THE INFORMATION IS ON THE PLAN |
| | IN VARIOUS PLACES BUT OTHER ITEMS ARE |
| | MISSING. |
| | |
| | (THIRD REVIEW)PLEASE ADD THE |
| | INFORMATION REQUIRED BY FBC1606.1.7(4). |
| | REVISE ROOF DESIGN PRESSURES AS NOTED IN |
| | 19 ABOVE. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 21.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 22.)WALL SECTIONS ON A5 SHOW A 21? |
| | TALL MASONRY WALL WITH NO INTERMEDIATE |
| | BEAM.3-A5 REFERS TO A BOND BEAM AT |
| | APPROXIMATELY 13?, AND STATES TO SEE |
| | STRUCTURALS.I AM UNABLE TO FIND THIS |
| | INTERMEDIATE BEAM AND IT IS NOT SHOWN |
| | GRAPHICALLY ON THE ARCHITECTURAL OR |
| | STRUCTURAL DETAILS. |
| | |
| | 23.)A TABLE WAS PROVIDED WITH DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES BASED ON SIZE AND ZONE, S0. |
| | PROVIDE A SCHEDULE OF OPENINGS |
| | SPECIFYING DESIGN PRESSURES (OPENING; |
| | COMPONENT TYPE I.E. ROLLUP DOOR, |
| | STOREFRONT, ETC.; AND DESIGN PRESSURE |
| | FOR THAT OPENING).ALSO SPECIFY DP FOR |
| | EIFS. |
| | |
| | (SECOND REVIEW)SEE ATTACHED |
| | FS553.80(2)(B).A 4X PLAN |
| | REVIEW FEE WILL BE CHARGED AS REQUIRED |
| | BY FLORIDA STATE STATUTE IF ITEMS ARE |
| | NOT CORRECTLY ADDRESSED ON THE NEXT |
| | REVIEW. |
| | |
| | (THIRD REVIEW)A 4X FEE HAS BEEN |
| | CHARGED AS REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTE. |
| | NO RESUB FEE WILL BE CHARGED.THE 4X |
| | FEE IS TO BE PAID PRIOR TO RESUBMITTAL. |
