| Date |
Text |
| 2005-12-28 00:00:00 | ********** UNSAT 2ND REVIEW ********** |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE THERE ARE NOTES FROM |
| | ORIGINAL REVIEW WHICH STILL NEED TO BE |
| | ADDRESSED. |
| | ** PLEASE SEE SOME NEW NOTES DUE TO |
| | CHANGES MADE TO PLANS, AND ITEMS BEING |
| | REMOVED FROM SAID DRAWINGS. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE FIRST PART OF NOTES BELOW |
| | HAVE BEEN TAKEN DIRECTLY FROM PREVIOUS |
| | REVIEW. |
| | |
| | |
| | 1)NOTE: NOTE #1 NO, |
| | PLEASE SEE MISSING INFORMATION REQUIRED |
| | ON TITLE BLOCK FOR ENGINEERING FIRM. |
| | PLEASE SEE 61G15-23.002 FOR MISSING |
| | PRINTED NAME AND PRINTED LICENSE # FOR |
| | ENGINEER. |
| | PLEASE SEE ARCHITECTS TITLE BLOCK FOR |
| | ALL SHEETS SHALL ALSO CONTAIN THE |
| | PRINTED NAME AND LICENSE # FOR ARCH. |
| | 61G1-16.004 |
| | |
| | THIS SEE THIS IS REQUIRED FOR ALL SHEETS |
| | AND FOR ALL TRADES WHETHER OR NOT |
| | COMMENT IS MADE BY OTHER REVIEWER(S). |
| | |
| | 2)NOTE: NOTE #2 OK. |
| | |
| | |
| | 3)NOTE: NOTE#3 NO, PLEASE SEE MOST |
| | CIRCUITING IS NOW SHOWN ON PLANS, |
| | HOWEVER SOME STILL APPEAR TO BE MISSING. |
| | PLEASE SEE NEW NOTES PERTAINING TO SOME |
| | ERRORS IN CIRUITING AND CORRELATION WITH |
| | PANEL SCHEDULES ETC. |
| | ** |
| | PLEASE SHOW ALL CIRCUITING ON |
| | PLANS AND CORRELATE WITH PANEL |
| | SCHEDULES. |
| | PLEASE SEE ALL CONTROL WIRING FOR |
| | LIGHTING PLANS. |
| | PLEASE SEE LIGHTING PLANS DO NOT SEEM TO |
| | BE COMPLETE AT THIS TIME? |
| | PLEASE SEE SOME AREAS DO NOT INDICATE |
| | ANY LIGHTING? WOMENS RESTROOM? |
| | PLEASE SEE THIS MAINLY SEEMS TO BE |
| | MISSING FROM LIGHTING PLANS. |
| | **PLEASE ALSO SEE CIRCUTING FOR A/C |
| | SYSTEMS, PANELS TEND TO BE INDICATED , |
| | HOWEVER NOT THE CIRCUITING. |
| | |
| | 4)NOTE: OK, HOWEVER SEE NOTE #5, AS |
| | AREAS NEED TO BE VERIFIED FOR EGREE ETC. |
| | SEE NEW NOTES> |
| | ** |
| | PLEASE SEE 700.12E FOR CIRCUITING |
| | OF EM/EXT LTS. THE BRANCH CIRCUIT |
| | FEEDING THE UNIT EQUIPMENT SHALL BE THE |
| | SAME BRANCH CIRCUIT AS THAT SERVING THE |
| | NORMAL LIGHTING IN THE AREA AND |
| | CONNECTED AHEAD OF ANY LOCAL SWITCHES. |
| | |
| | 5)NOTE: NOTE #5, NO, INFACT ALL OF THE |
| | AREAS AND ROOM DESIGNATIONSWHICH WERE |
| | SHOWN ON ORIGINAL PLANS HAVE NOW BEEN |
| | REMOVED MAKING IT IMPOSSIBLE TO REVIEW |
| | SOME THINGS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. PLEASE |
| | SEE NEW COMMENTS. |
| | ** |
| | PLEASE INCLUDE ROOM/AREA |
| | DESIGNATIONS ON PLANS. THIS SHOULD BE ON |
| | ALL SHEETS. |
| | 215.5 |
| | |
| | 6)NOTE: NOTE #6 OK. |
| | |
| | |
| | 7)NOTE: NOTE #7 OK,NO, AS THIS AREA HAS |
| | NOW BEEN REMOVEDFROM PLANS AND THE KE |
| | PLANS NOW MENTIONS CIRCUITING. |
| | PLEASE SEE KE PLANS WHICH MENTIONS THESE |
| | ARE PRELIMINARY PLANS AND SHOULD NOT BE |
| | USED?? |
| | ** |
| | PLEASE SHOW ALL CIRCUITING ON |
| | KITCHEN ELECTRICAL PLAN FOR ALL. PLEASE |
| | CORRELATE THIS WITH EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE |
| | SUBMITTED AND PANEL SCHEDULES. |
| | |
| | 8)NOTE: NOTE #8 NO,IT IS UNCLEAR WHERE |
| | ANY CHANGES HAVE BEEN MADE FOR THIS. |
| | PLEASE SEE NOTE #5 MENTIONS GFI FOR |
| | UTILITY OUTLETS? |
| | ** |
| | PLEASE SEE 2002 NEC 210.8B3 FOR |
| | KITCHENS IN OTHER THAN DWELLING UNITS |
| | WHICH REQUIRES ALL 15- AND 20-AMPERE, |
| | 125-VOLT RECEPTACLES IN NONDWELLING-TYPE |
| | KITCHENS TO BE GFCI PROTECTED. THIS |
| | REQUIREMENT APPLIES TO EACH AND EVERY |
| | 15- AND 20-AMPERE, 125-VOLT KITCHEN |
| | RECEPTACLE, WHETHER OR NOT THE |
| | RECEPTACLE SERVES COUNTERTOP APPLIANCES. |
| | |
| | |
| | 9)NOTE: NOTE #9 NO?? SEE NOTES WITH |
| | RESPECT TO ROOM AND AREA DESIGNATIONS |
| | BEING REMOVED. |
| | ** |
| | PLEASE SHOW AND INDICATE ELEVATOR |
| | EQUIPMENT ROOM. PLEASE SEE |
| | STATE ELEVATOR CODE , NO OTHER EQUIPMENT |
| | UNLESS PART OF THE DESIGNATED ELEVATOR |
| | EQUIPMENT SHALL BE IN ELEVATOR ROOMS. |
| | PLEASE SEE 620.23,620.24, PLEASE VERIFY |
| | AND SHOW IF THESE ARE TO BE NEW OR |
| | EXISTING. |
| | |
| | 10)NOTE: NOTE #10 NO, SAME AS PREVIOUS |
| | NOTES. PLEASE ALSO SEE NFPA-101 7.8.1.3, |
| | 7.9.2 WHICH MAY ALSO BE USED IN |
| | REFERENCE IN THESE AREA NEED ING BATTERY |
| | BACK UP FIXTURES. |
| | ** |
| | PLEASE SEE 700.16 FOR |
| | ELECTRICAL RMS, EQUIPMENT RMS, ELEVATOR |
| | RMS. |
| | |
| | 11)NOTE: NOTE # 11, NO , UNCLEAR AS A |
| | "KEYED NOTE" ON RISER (NOTE #1 ON 5.1 |
| | MENTIONS PANEL "D" WAS NOT ABLE TO BE |
| | LOCATED FOR WHERE FEED COMES FROM,,ETC. |
| | PLEASE KNOW, IT WAS DICUSSED WITH |
| | ENGINEER OF RECORD THIS WOULD BE A |
| | "PROVISO" IN WHICH THE INFORMATION WOULD |
| | BE REQUIRED BEFORE ANY INSPECTIONS WERE |
| | MADE. |
| | PLEASE KNOW AT THAT TIME IT WAS |
| | IMPERATIVE TO START PROJECT SO THIS WAS |
| | AGREED. PLEASE SEE RISER STILL SHOWS |
| | THIS PANEL "D" COMING FROM PANEL "M"? |
| | WAS IT DISCOVERED IN THE "DEMO WORK" |
| | THAT THIS PANEL IS FED FROM "M" AND |
| | REASON WHY IT IS STILL SHOWN FROM "M"? |
| | |
| | THE FIRST REVIEW WAS DONE IN JULY 05 AND |
| | THE AMOUNT OF TIME AND DEMO WORK SINCE |
| | SHOULD REVEALED THIS INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | |
| | 12)NOTE: NOTE #12 NO?? COULD NOT LOCATE. |
| | ** |
| | PLEASE SHOW ALL CONTINUOUS |
| | LOADS AND LARGEST MOTOR ARE TO BE SHOWN |
| | @125% |
| | 215.3,230.42 ETC, |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | **************************************** |
| | THE FOLLOWING COMMENT HAS TO DO WITH |
| | ELECTRICAL RISER DIAGRAM,ONE-LINE |
| | DIAGRAM AND PANEL SCHEDULES. |
| | **************************************** |
| | |
| | 13)NOTE: NOTE #13 NO, MOST OF THESE |
| | ITEMS WERE CORRECTED HOWEVER PLEASE SEE |
| | TC SHOWN AS 70A AND 100A ON ONE-LINE AND |
| | RISER. |
| | PLEASE SEE A NEW PANEL BR1 IS SHOWNON |
| | ONE-LINE, RISER, PANEL "LL" AND NOTED IN |
| | NOTES, HOWEVER NO PANEL SCHEDULE, |
| | CIRCUITING SUBMITTED TO VERIFY. |
| | ** |
| | |
| | PLEASE CORRELATE ALL PANELS ON |
| | ONELINE, RISER AND PANEL SCHEDULES |
| | SUBMITTED. |
| | PLEASE SEE THERE ARE TOO NUMEROUS ITEMS |
| | WHICH DO NOT MATCH UP WITH EACH OTHER. |
| | PLEASE SEE AMERAGES OF PANELS SHOWN |
| | DIFFERENTLY ON EACH, SEE SOME SHOWN AS |
| | 225A AND 300A ETC. |
| | PLEASE SEE SOME PANELS BEING SHOWN BEING |
| | FED FROM"DPB", YET OTHER SHEETS SHOW |
| | THESE PANELS FROM "DPA" AND YET PANEL |
| | SCHEDULES FOR THESE SHOW SOMETHING |
| | ELSE?? PLEASE SEE "DPA" TO G,GA,B, 2BA |
| | AND RISER SHOWS FROM "DPB" ETC. |
| | PLEASE SEE SOME PANEL SHOWN AS ONE SIZE |
| | MLO, YET INDICATE ON PANEL SCHEULE SHOWS |
| | A DIFFERENT SIZE.? |
| | PLEASE SEE PANELS LABELED AS ONE THING |
| | ON ONE-LINE ANDSOEMTHING ELSE ON RISER |
| | DIAGRAM AND PANEL SCHEDULE? KDP, KDP1, |
| | 600A/ 500A??? ETC,, |
| | PLEASE SEE POOL RM PANEL, PANEL N ETC. |
| | PLEASE SEE ONE LINE SHOWS DISCONNECT |
| | FROM WW MDP TO KDP/KDP1, YET RISER DOES |
| | NOT SHOW THIS? |
| | PLEASE SEE SOME PANELS SHOWN AS MLO, YET |
| | ALSO SHOWS HAVING A MAIN? |
| | PLEASE INCLUDE ALL INFORMATION FOR ALL |
| | DISCONNECTS ON RISER. |
| | PLEASE LABEL ALL PANELS,DISC'S, MDP ETC |
| | ON RISER. |
| | |
| | ******************************** |
| | NEW NOTES DUE TO CHANGES AND INFORMATION |
| | BEING CHANGED AND/OR SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | 1)NOTE: PLEASE SEE ORIGINAL NOTES WITH |
| | RESPECT TO SHOWING ALL CIRCUITING,PLEASE |
| | SEE MOST CIRCUITING IS NOW SHOWN, |
| | HOWEVER PLEASE SEE SOME OF THE FOLLOWING |
| | WHICH DO NOT SEEM TO CORRELATE ETC. |
| | |
| | *PLEASE SEE CIRCUITING ON PANEL "N", |
| | MOST A/C EQUIPMENT IS NOTED AS BEING |
| | 3-POLE ITEMS, HOWEVER CIRCUITING ON |
| | PANEL SCHEDULES, SHOWS ITEMS TAKING THE |
| | SPACE AND NUMBERED AS 2-POLE? |
| | |
| | *PLEASE SEEE-2.1A, SHOWS 86 AHU-9 TO |
| | DPB-1, YET DPB, IS BLANK AT THIS |
| | LOCATION. |
| | |
| | *PLEASE SEE E-2.1.C UNIT LABELED AS |
| | EDH-1, PANEL "N", YET PANEL "N" DOES NOT |
| | SHOW THIS. ALTHOUGH, THERE SEEMS TO BE A |
| | UNIT WHICH HAS THE SAME KW RATING ETC, |
| | HOWEVER IT IS LABELED"DEH", IS THIS |
| | THE SAME AND ONLY A MISPRINT? |
| | |
| | *PLEASE SEE E-2.1.C WHICH SHOWS 5AHU-7 |
| | TO "N", YET THIS COULD NOT BE LOCATED ON |
| | "N"? |
| | |
| | *PLEASE SEE E-2.2A, 86AHU-5 TO D-7,9,11, |
| | NEW OR EXSITING. ?AS MANY NEW AREAS |
| | ARE NOW SHOWN SHADED, WHICH WERE NOT ON |
| | ORIGINAL PLANS? |
| | |
| | 2)NOTE: PLEASE SEE NOTES ON PLANS |
| | CONTAIN NUMERICAL NOTES TO SEE 4.1 FOR |
| | PANELS ETC, HOWEVER THIS ROOMS SEEMS TO |
| | BE MISSING IDENTIFICATION ETC ETC. |
| | |
| | 3)NOTE: PLEASE SEE PLANS NOW HAVE NOTES |
| | ADDED FOR SOME ITEMS. PLEASE KNOW, NOTES |
| | BEING ADDED TO PLANS DO NOT ALLEAVIATE |
| | THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL FROM PROVIDING |
| | THE TECHNICAL INFORMATION NEEDED. PLEASE |
| | SEE NOTE WHICH MENTIONS TO SEE ARCHITECT |
| | TO DETERMINE HEIGHTS ETC. PLEASE KNOW, |
| | THESE THINGS SHOULD BE ON SAID PLANS. |
| | |
| | 4)NOTE: PLEASE SEE PANEL DPB WHICH SHOWS |
| | THE DE-RATED LOAD FROM PANEL "N", WHICH |
| | SEEMS TO HAVE BEEN DER-RATED ONCE AGAIN |
| | FOR DPB CALCS??? |
| | PLEASE CLARIFY THIS. |
| | |
| | 5)NOTE: PLEASE SEE ATTACHED COPY OF FS |
| | 553.80(2)(B) WITH RESPECT TO DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONAL AND REPEAT COMMENTS. |
| | PLEASE KNOW, IF PLANS COME BACK WITH ANY |
| | OF THE SAME COMMENT SFROM THE FIRST |
| | REVIEWS NOT ADDRESSED FOR CODE |
| | COMPLIANCE, THE STATE STATUES, REQUIES A |
| | 4X FEE BE ASSESSED FOR THE PLAN REVIEW |
| | PORTION OF THE BASE PERMIT FEE. (30% X4) |
| | TO THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL FOR REPEAT |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | PLEASE KNOW, IT IS STRONGLY SUGGESTED A |
| | MEETING BE HELD TO GO OVER COMMENTS AS |
| | NOT TO HAVE THIS IMPLEMENTED. |
| | THIS AMOUNT WOULD COME TO $13,800.00. |
| | PLEASE KNOW THE 10% RE-SUB WILL BE DUE |
| | WHEN PLANS COME BACK IN FOR THIRD |
| | REVIEW. |
| | ** PLEASE KNOW, ONE COPY OF THIS |
| | SUBMITTIAL OF ELECTRICAL PLANS WILL BE |
| | RETAINED AND PLACED WITH PLANS FROM |
| | ORIGINAL REVIEW WHICH WERE ALSO |
| | REETAINED. |
| | |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO SEE ANY COMMENTS |
| | FROM OTHER REVIEWER(S) WHICH MAY AFFECT |
| | ELECTRICAL PLANS. |
| | |
| | **PLEASE GO THROUGH ALL PLANS PANELS, |
| | DISCONNECTS ETC AND CORRELATE. |
| | |
| | |
| | PLEASE REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND |
| | ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED SHEETS INTO |
| | COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. |
| | ONE SET OF OLD/VOIDED SHEETS FROM OTHER |
| | TRADES SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR |
| | REFERENCE. THIS WILL NOT BE REQUIRED OF |
| | VOIDED ELECTRICAL SHEETS AS ONE SET IS |
| | ALREADY RETAINED. |
| | |
| | PLEASE SUBMIT THE ABOVE INFORMATION FOR |
| | REVIEW. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS, |
| | PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CALL. |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
| 2005-12-27 00:00:00 | REVIEW WILL GO INTO "F" STATUS, REVIEW |
| | IN PROGRESS. |
| | NOTES TO FOLLOW. |
| 2005-12-26 00:00:00 | ONE ROLL IN ELECTRICAL FOR REVIEW. |
| | NO RESPONSE LETTER(S) FROM DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONALS SUBMITTED. |
