| Date |
Text |
| 2006-01-11 00:00:00 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | PERMIT:05070295 |
| | ADD: 1256 PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD |
| | CONT: MASTER CONTRACTORS |
| | TEL: (561)712-8898 |
| | FL BLD CODE= 2001 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE |
| | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW |
| | ACTION: DENIED |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE |
| | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY |
| | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER |
| | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUM- |
| | BER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION |
| | MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICA |
| | TION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND |
| | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK |
| | YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) COMMENET# 3 FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW: |
| | 705.7.1 JOINTS INSTALLED IN OR BE- TWEEN |
| | FIRE RESISTANT WALLS, FIRE RESIS- TANT |
| | FLOORS OR FLOOR/ CEILING ASSEMBLIES AND |
| | FIRE RESISTANT ROOFS OR ROOF/ CEIL- ING |
| | ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE PROTECTED BY AN |
| | APPROVED FIRE RESISTANT JOINT SYSTEM |
| | DESIGNED TO RESIST THE PASSAGE OF FIRE |
| | FOR A PERIOD NOT LESS THAN THE RE- |
| | QUIRED FIRE RESISTANCE RATING OF THE |
| | WALL, FLOOR OR FLOOR IN OR BETWEEN |
| | WHICH IT IS INSTALLED. |
| | THE AREA OF CONCERN IS BETWEEN THE |
| | RATED WALL AND THE ROOF ASSEMBLY. |
| | 705.7.2. AND TABLE 705.7 WILL REQUIRE A |
| | SYSTEM THAT WILL COMPLY WITH 500 CYCLES |
| | OF EXPANSION AND CONTRACTION WITHOUT |
| | FAILURE. |
| | (UL OR EQUIVALENT) PROVIDE A FLEXIBLE |
| | JOINT FIRE AND SMOKE ASSEMBLY AT THE |
| | TENANT SEPERATION BETWEEN WALL A |
| | ROOF DECK. |
| | |
| | 2) COMMENT# 4 FROM THE PREVIOUS |
| | REVIEW,DISCREPANCY BETWEEN A-2 & THE |
| | MEP-1, THE NEW OFFICE DOORS ARE IN |
| | DIFFERENT LOCATIONS OR MISSING , PLEASE |
| | CORRECT. |
| | |
| | 3) COMMENT 6A) FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW, |
| | 6A) PRODUCT APPROVALS, THE ARCH EXTERIOR |
| | DOORS(01-0226.05) AND STOREFRONT) |
| | SYSTEMS (00-1220.05)SUBMITTED WILL |
| | REQUIRE A HURRICANE PROTECTIVE SYSTEM. |
| | PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL REPORT |
| | FOR STORM SHUTTERS WITH A FL COVER |
| | SHEET. |
| | PROVIDE STORM PANEL INFORMATION WITH |
| | INSTALLATION SCHEDULE AND KEY PLAN WITH |
| | SPECIFIC ANCHORS AND MOUNTING TO BE USED |
| | FOR ALL NON-IMPACT GLAZING. |
| | FBC 1606.1.4. |
| | FL BLD CODE 2001 SECTION 103.6, |
| | 1606.1.4, 1707.4 & 3401.7.2.4. |
| | PROCEDURES: 1(B) A COMPLETE INSTALLATION |
| | SCHEDULE SUMMARIZING & IDENTIFYING |
| | OPENING SIZES, STORY HEIGHTS, UNIT MARK |
| | NUMBERS, UNIT SPANS/WIDTHS, UNIT STORM |
| | BAR REINFORCING REQUIREMENTS, WALL PRES- |
| | SURE ZONES, SLAT TYPES, ETC., SHALL BE |
| | SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERMIT APPLICATION |
| | TO FACILITATE PLAN REVIEW AND PERMIT |
| | ISSUANCE. |
| | 6B) YKK EXTERIOR DOOR, SUPPLY THE DADE |
| | COUNTY NOA MENTIONED IN THE FLORIDA |
| | REPORT: |
| | 04-0227.02 LARGE MISSLE |
| | 04-0227.03 SMALL MISSLE |
| | IF THE REPORT THAT WILL BE SUBMITTED IS |
| | FOR SMALL MISSLE IMPACT, PROVIDE THE |
| | INFORMATION THAT IS LISTED ABOVE FOR |
| | STORM SHUTTER REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | 4)COMMENT 6B) FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW, |
| | 6B) FL BLD CODE 104.2.1.2 |
| | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED, |
| | THE DOOR SCHEDULE INDICATES DOOR# 3 TO |
| | BE A HOLLOW CORE METAL CLAD DOOR, WHERE |
| | AS THE FLOOR PLAN & ELEVATIONS INDICATE |
| | GLASS DOORS WITH SIDE LIGHTS. |
| | 6C) 2405.2.1 THE FOLLOWING SHALL BE |
| | CONSIDERED SPECIFIC HAZARDOUS LOCATIONS |
| | FOR THE PURPOSES OF GLAZING: |
| | 3. GLAZING IN AN INDIVIDUAL FIXED OR |
| | OPERABLE PANEL ADJACENT TO A DOOR |
| | WHERE THE NEAREST VERTICAL EDGE |
| | IS WITHIN A 24-INCH (610 MM) RADIUS |
| | OF THE DOOR IN A CLOSED POSITION |
| | AND WHOSE BOTTOM EDGE IS LESS THAN |
| | 60 INCHES (1524 MM) ABOVE THE |
| | FLOOR OR WALKING SURFACE. |
| | |
| | 5) COMMENT# 7 FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW |
| | THE INTERIOR DEMO PERMIT TO BE |
| | SATISFIED.COMMENT FROM FIELD INSPECTOR |
| | ABOUT FIRE DAMAGE, ENGINEERS LETTER |
| | REQUIRED FOR ROOF FRAMING MEMBERS AND |
| | DECK.PULLED THE PERMIT 05120051 AND |
| | FOUND NO REPORT, THIS WAS PART OF THE |
| | FIELD INSPECTORS REQUIREMENTS!!!!!!!! |
| | |
| | 6) COMMENT# 8 FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW, |
| | PLANS INDICATE EXISTING HANDICAPPED |
| | RAMP PROVIDE HEIGHT OF THE EXISTING |
| | RAMP AND CONFIGURATION. MAY REQUIRE |
| | UPGRADES, SEE 11-4.8 SLOPE, RISE, |
| | LANDINGS AND HANDRAILS. |
| | 11-4.8.8 OUTDOOR CONDITIONS. OUTDOOR |
| | RAMPS AND THEIR APPROACHES SHALL |
| | BE DESIGNED SO THAT WATER WILL NOT |
| | ACCUMULATE ON WALKING SURFACES. |
| | 6A) |
| | THE FRONT OF THE DOLLAR STORE INDICATES |
| | A RAMP WITH A FORWARD APPROACH ON SHEET |
| | A-2 WHERE AS SHEET A-3 INDICATES ANOTHER |
| | DETAIL SHOWING A COMMON LANDING AND 2 |
| | RAMPS AT A 180 DEGREES FROM EACH OTHER. |
| | THESE 2 RAMPS APPEAR TO HAVE RUNS LONGER |
| | THAN 6'-0" REQUIRING A RAILING. NO LOWER |
| | LANDING IS PROVIDED. THIS SAME DETAIL |
| | INDICATES IN THE LEGEND SCALE 1/4" AND |
| | N. T. S. "NOT TO SCALE"WITH NO |
| | DIMENSION PROVIDED FOR THE RUN OF THE |
| | RAMP. |
| | 6B) |
| | THE SAME PROBLEMS ARISE ON THE SIDE |
| | OF THE BUILDING WHERE RAMPS APPEAR NO |
| | INFORMATION PROVIDED. |
| | 11-4.8.3. CLEAR WIDTH. THE MINIMUM |
| | CLEAR WIDTH OF A RAMP SHALL BE 36". |
| | EXCEPTION: RAMPS THAT ARE PART OF A |
| | REQUIRED MEANS OF EGRESS SHALL NOT BE |
| | LESS THAN 44 INCHES WIDE. |
| | 11-4.8.4.(2) LANDINGS. ALL LANDINGS |
| | ON RAMPS SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 60" |
| | CLEAR, & THE BOTTOM OF EACH RAMP SHALL |
| | HAVE NOT LESS THAN 72" OF STRAIGHT & |
| | LEVEL CLEARENCE. |
| | 11.4.8.5. HANDRAILS: IF A RAMP HAS |
| | A RISE GREATER THAN 6" OR A HORIZONTAL |
| | PROJECTION GREATER THAN 72", THEN IT |
| | SHALL HAVE HANDRAILS ON BOTH SIDES. |
| | |
| | 6C) |
| | NOTE: |
| | 11-4.1.6(2) DUTY TO PROVIDE AN |
| | ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL TO ALTERED |
| | AREAS SHALL BE DEEMED DISPROPORTIONATE |
| | TO THE OVERALL ALTERATION WHEN THE COST |
| | EXCEEDS 20 % OF THE COST OF THE ALTERA- |
| | TION TO THE PRIMARY FUNCTION AREA. |
| | (A)(I) AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE |
| | (II) AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE |
| | |
| | 7) SEE THE ELECTRICAL REVIEWERS COMMENTS |
| | THAT DEAL WITH PHOTOCOPIED PLANS, |
| | ASSUMING WORK OF ONOTHER DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONAL,AND AFFIXING ONES SEAL TO |
| | PLANS THAT WERE NOT PREPARED BY OR UNDER |
| | THIER SUPERVISING CONTROL. ONE SET OF |
| | PLANS HAS BEEN RETAINED FOR REVIEW BY |
| | THE FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF ARCHITECTURE. |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | JIM WITMER |
| | TEL: (561)805-6715 |
| | FAX: (561)659-8026 |
| | |
