| Date |
Text |
| 2007-01-17 07:40:38 | ** UNSAT** |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE SOME COMMENTS FOR COORDINATION AND |
| | CHANGES ON PLANS NEED TO BE ADDRESSED. |
| | PLEASE ALSO SEE NEW COMMENT #4. |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE ON THE PREVIOUS REVIEW IT WAS |
| | REQUESTED TO SUBMIT THE MANUFACTURE'S SPEC/CUT SHEETS |
| | FOR THE LIGHTING HOME AUTOMATION SYSTEM WHICH WAS GOING |
| | TO BE INSTALLED. A COVER LETTER MENTIONS ONE SYSTEM |
| | WHICH WOULD BE THE LUTRONWHICH MAY BE DONE WITH FOUR |
| | OR FIVE PANELS AND ONE SYSTEM WHICH COULD BE DONE WITH |
| | THREE PANELS. |
| | PLEASE SEE TWO COMPLETELY DIFFERENT PACKAGES FOR THESE |
| | SYSTEMS WERE SUBMITTED WITH ONLY ONE CONTAINING THE |
| | LISTING FROM A NRTL. PLEASE SEE THE PACKAGE FOR SYSTEM |
| | WHICH IS BEING CALLED A CRESTRON DID NOT SEEM IT |
| | CONTAINED ANY LISTINGS WHICH COULD BE READILY LOCATED |
| | ON SHEETS PROVIDED. |
| | ** PLEASE SEE ON THE OTHER HAND THE PLANS SHOWS 4 |
| | LIGHTING CONTROL PANELS WHICH WOULD NOT CORRELATE WITH |
| | THE STATEMENT ON THE COVER SHEETS WHICH MENTIONS ONLY |
| | THREE PANELS ARE BEING USED (CRESTRON). |
| | PLEASE CORRELATE PLANS AND SUBMITTALS AND ONLY SUBMIT |
| | THE SYSTEM BEING PROPOSED. |
| | 110.3, 90.7 |
| | FBC 106.1.2 ADMIN SECTION. |
| | |
| | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW WHICH REQUESTED THE |
| | MANUFACTURE'S SPEC/CUT SHEETS FOR THE NEW PROPOSED ATS |
| | BEING INSTALLED. PLEASE SEE THIS WAS DONE, HOWEVER |
| | SPECS FOR AN ATS WERE SUBMITTED. PLEASE SEE THE PLANS |
| | NOW CONTAIN WHAT IS BEING SHOWN AS A MTS, WHICH IS |
| | BEING DONE? |
| | PLEASE CORRELATE THESE ALSO. |
| | 90.7, 110.3, FBC 106.1.2 ADMIN SECTION. |
| | |
| | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW WHICH REQUESTED THE |
| | AIC RATING OF THE EQUIPMENT BEING INSTALLED. PLEASE SEE |
| | A NOTE ON PLANS NOW MENTIONS 42K AND THE ELECTRICAL |
| | CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY WITH FPL ETC BEFORE ORDERING. THIS |
| | INFORMATION IS SOMETHING THAT IS REQUIRED TO BE |
| | VERIFIED AT THIS TIME. CONTACT SHOULD BE MADE TO THE |
| | SERVICE PLANNER FOR THE AREA AND THE INFORMATION CAN BE |
| | EASILY FOUND OUT. |
| | PLEASE SEE THAT THE RATINGS ON THE PLANS CALL FOR 42K |
| | MAIN AND 22K RATED MAINS ON THE LOAD SIDE OF THE HOUSE |
| | SERVICE MAIN AND 22K RATED BRANCH BREAKERS. ALL OF |
| | THESE RATINGS ARE PERMITTED AND ARE OK; HOWEVER PLEASE |
| | KNOW IF THESE RATINGS ARE SHOWN, THEN THIS IS WHAT |
| | WOULD BE REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED. PLEASE VERIFY THIS, |
| | AS THIS IS ONLY BEING NOTED. CONSIDERATION TO THE COST |
| | OF THE RATED EQUIPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF 22K RATED |
| | BRANCH BREAKERS ETC MAY WANT TO BE TAKEN INTO |
| | CONSIDERATION. |
| | 110.9. |
| | |
| | 4) NOTE:PLEASE KNOW THAT SINCE THE LAST REVIEW OF |
| | THIS PROJECT, A MEETING WAS HELD AT THE SOUTHERN |
| | SECTION MEETING IN OCT 06 WHERE WE WERE DIRECTLY |
| | INFORMED BY NFPA THAT THE USE OF "SD" FOR SMOKE |
| | DETECTORS ON PLANS FOR RESIDENTIAL HOMES IS NOT |
| | ACCEPTABLE WHEN THESE DEVICES ANY ACTUALLY FALL UNDER |
| | THE DEFINITIONS OF SMOKE ALARMS WHICH WOULD BE SHOWN AS |
| | "SA"/SMOKE ALARMS". |
| | THIS INFORMATION WAS NEW TO THIS AHJ AS THE GENERAL USE |
| | OF THE SD FOR SMOKE DETECTORS WAS ALWAYS ACCEPTED. BY |
| | THE DEFINITIONS AS STATED IN NFPA-72 A SD/ SMOKE |
| | DETECTOR IS ONLY A DEVICE WHICH WILL DETECT AND WILL |
| | NOT SOUND AN AUDIBLE ALARM. THIS WOULD BE DONE BY |
| | HORN/SIREN TYPE DEVICES. PLEASE SEE THE DEFINITIONS OF |
| | SA/SMOKE ALARMS; THESE ARE DEVICES WHICH ARE 120V (AS |
| | SHOWN) AND WOULD DETECT AND SOUND AN ALARM. THIS IS |
| | SOMETHING THAT IS NOW BEING COMMENTED ON OTHER REVIEWS |
| | FOR OTHER NEW HOMES; HOWEVER THIS WAS NOT A COMMENT |
| | FROM THIS AHJ OR REVIEWER BEFORE AS THIS INFORMATION |
| | WAS MADE AWARE TO ALL OF THE JURISDICTIONS PRESENT, |
| | MOST OF WHICH HAD ALSO ALWAYS ACCEPTED SD AND THE |
| | STATED SMOKE DETECTORS. |
| | IF THE ONLY COMMENT ON THE PLANS WAS THIS, THE PLANS |
| | WOULD HAVE BEEN REDLINED FOR THE CORRECTIONS AND WOULD |
| | BE ISSUED WITH REVISIONS TO FOLLOW. |
| | PLEASE MAKE ADJUSTMENTS FOR THESE AS PLANS ARE COMING |
| | BACK FOR ZONING COMMENTS AND NOTES ABOVE. |
| | ** PLEASE SEE THAT SMOKE ALARMS ARE STATED IN THE FBC |
| | RESIDENTIAL CODE/ FBC AND IN NFPA-72. |
| | 11.5.1.1, 11.8.3 |
| | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS ON THIS COMMENT PLEASE DO |
| | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE. |
| | |
| | |
| | * ** IMPORTANT** |
| | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE |
| | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE |
| | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED |
| | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED |
| | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW |
| | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. |
| | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED |
| | FOR REFERENCE. |
| | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND |
| | AVOID ANY DELAYS. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR |
| | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF |
| | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, |
| | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO |
| | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS |
| | REVIEWER. |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
| 2007-01-17 07:02:33 | 2007-01-17 07:02:33 |
| | IN PROGRESS |
