| Date |
Text |
| 2007-07-09 18:32:27 | DENIED |
| | REFERENCE: FBC-2001 PLUMBING |
| | FBC-2001 CHAPTER 1 |
| | FLORIDA STATUTES |
| | |
| | FROM PREVIOUS REVIEWS: THE COMMENT NUMBER SHALL REMAIN |
| | THE SAME TO AVOID CONFUSION. |
| | ******FROM PREVIOUS REVIEWS: |
| | |
| | 1. ADDRESSED |
| | 2. OK |
| | |
| | 3. CONTACT DEPT OF BUSINESS REGULATION HOTEL & |
| | RESTAURANT DIVISION. PROVIDE THEIR COMMENT SHEET AND |
| | TWO SETS OF STAMPED PLANS. NO COMMENT, WORK SHEETSNOT |
| | INCLUDED. |
| | ****RESONSE NOTED, BUT ONE STAMPED SHEET FROM DBPR WITH |
| | THE TWO PAGE "WORKSHEETS" ATTACHED SHALL BE SUBMITTED |
| | IN EACH SET OF PLANS. SECTION 101.4.7.-ONLY ONE |
| | STAMPED SHEET HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, AND THAT IS ON AN OLD |
| | SET OF PLANS THAT WILL NOT BE APPROVED. PLEASE COMPLY |
| | WITH REQUIRED STAMPED PAGES AND "WORKSHEETS". |
| | ******RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE DBPR FOOD SERVICE STAMP |
| | IS NOT ON THE MOST RECENT SET OF PLAN AS WELL AS THE |
| | "WORKSHEETS" AS REQUESTED. |
| | |
| | 4. ADDRESSED |
| | |
| | 5. PROVIDE A WATER RISER ISOMETRIC SHOWING ALL FIXTURE |
| | CONNECTIONS. BACKFLOW PREVENTER REQUIRED AT WATER |
| | METER. |
| | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE WATER ISOMETRIC DOES NOT |
| | REFLECT THE FLOOR PLAN. RISER INDICATES A BACKFLOW |
| | PREVENTER AND ALSO A BACKFLOW. PLEASE CLARIFY. -THE |
| | RISER SHOWS 3 W/C'S & 4 LAVS, WHEREAS THE FLOOR PLAN |
| | ONLY SHOWS TWO W/C'S AND TWO LAV'S.-THE MOP SINK IS |
| | NOT INDICATED ON THE RISER.-THE W/C & LAV IN THE |
| | SECOND TOILET ROOM ARE NOT SHOWN IN THE SAME ORDER ON |
| | THE RISER DIAGRAM AS SHOWN ON THE PLUMBING PLAN, (FLOOR |
| | PLAN).-PLEASE IDENTIFY ALL FIXTURES ON THE WATER |
| | RISER ISOMETRIC DIAGRAM. SECTION 104.2.1. |
| | ******RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE RISER DIAGRAM STILL DOES |
| | NOT REFLECT THE FLOOR PLAN. THE LAVS AND W/CS ARE BACK |
| | TO BACK IN SEPARATE TOILET ROOMS, NOT LINED UP ON ONE |
| | COMMON WALL. ALSO AS DRAWN, THE WATER SUPPLY IS |
| | INSTALLED UNDERGROUND AND THE WATER STUBBED UP THROUGH |
| | THE FLOOR. THIS WORKS EXCEPT FOR THEWATER HEATER |
| | WHICH IS IN A LOFT ABOVE THE COOLER/FREEZER. AS DRAWN |
| | THE WATER HEATER WOULD BE BELOW GROUND. A RISER TO THE |
| | LOFT FOR THE WATER HEATER IS REQUIRED TO REFLECT THE |
| | FLOOR PLAN. |
| | |
| | 6. NEW COMMENT PLUMBING ISOMETRIC DOES NOT MATCH THE |
| | FLOOR PLAN.. |
| | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE SANITARY RISER ISOMETRIC |
| | DIAGRAM STILL DOES NOT REFLECT THE FLOOR PLAN. THE |
| | FLOOR SINK FOR THE ICE MAKER IS SHOWN CONNECTING TO THE |
| | GREASE SYSTEM ON THE FLOOR PLAN, BUT IS SHOWN ON THE |
| | SANITARY SYSTEM ON THE RISER DIAGRAM.-THREE FLOOR |
| | DRAINS AND ONE HAND SINK ARE ON A SEPARATE BRANCH LINE |
| | ON THE FLOOR PLAN, BUT ARE ON THE SAME BRANCH LINE WITH |
| | THE THREE COMPARTMENT SINK ON THE RISER DIAGRAM.- THE |
| | MOP SINK IS SHOWN BY THE THREE COMPARTMENT SINK ON THE |
| | RISER DIAGRAM, BUT SHOWN BY THE TOILET ROOMS ON THE |
| | FLOOR PLAN.-IDENTIFY ALL FIXTURES ON THE RISER |
| | DIAGRAM AND CORRELATE ALL INFORMATION BETWEEN THE FLOOR |
| | PLAN AND THE RISER DIAGRAM.-SHOW ALL PIPE SIZES.- |
| | (SEE ATTACHED SHEET FOR AN EXAMPLE OF A RISER DIAGRAM |
| | THAT REFLECTS THE FLOOR PLAN AND MEETS CODE |
| | REQUIREMENTS). |
| | ******RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE RISER DIAGRAM STILL DOES |
| | NOT REFLECT THE FLOOR PLAN, NOR DOES IT MEET CODE |
| | REQUIREMENTS. THE RISER DIAGRAM SHOWS 2 EXTRA LAVS NOT |
| | SHOWN ON THE FLOOR PLAN.--THE BRANCH LINES |
| | INDICATED ON THE FLOOR PLAN ARE NOT REFLECTED ON THE |
| | RISER DIAGRAM AS INDICATED PREVIOUSLY. --THERE ARE |
| | TWO DRAIN LINES CONNECTING TO THE FLOOR SINK IN THE |
| | WAITRESS STATION.--THE MOP SINK SHALL BE VENTED. |
| | SECTIONS 106.1.1, 1002.1. THE RISER DIAGRAM SENT AS AN |
| | EXAMPLE WAS NOT REFERENCED WHEN REDRAWING THE SANT. |
| | RISER DIAGRAM. |
| | |
| | 7. SHT 2, NOTES FROM PREVIOUS PLAN REVIEWER, JOHN LEECH |
| | DENIED |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.OK |
| | 2. OK |
| | 3. OK |
| | 4. OK |
| | 5. OK |
| | |
| | ************NEW COMMENTS************ |
| | |
| | 1C. SHT P-1 SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR THE WATER PIPE |
| | SIZING PER SECTION 604.3. |
| | ******RESPONSE NOTED, BUT NO CALCULATIONS WERE FOUND ON |
| | SHT P-1. |
| | |
| | 2C. OK |
| | |
| | 3C. SHT P-1 THE FLOOR DRAIN LOCATED WITHIN THE WALK IN |
| | COOLER SHALL BE INDIRECTLY CONNECTED TO THE SANITARY |
| | SYSTEM BY AN AIR GAP. SECTION 802.1.2. |
| | ******RESPONSE NOTED, BUT IT STILL APPEARS TO BE |
| | CONNECTED DIRECTLY TO THE FLOOR SINK. PLEASE SUBMIT A |
| | DETAIL SHOWING THE INDIRECT WAST CONNECTION TO THE |
| | FLOOR SINK AS WELL AS THE REQUIRED 4" AIR GAP. |
| | |
| | 4C. SEE ATTACHED SHEET CONCERNING THE DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONAL AND FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B). THIS IS |
| | GIVEN AS A ONE TIME NOTICE. |
| | ******A FOUR TIMES THE FEE WOULD HAVE BEEN ASSESSED |
| | THIS TIME, BUT THE ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEWER HAS |
| | ASSESSED THE FEE. IF THE PLANS ARE SUBMITTED AGAIN AND |
| | THE SAME COMMENTS ARE STILL NOT ADDRESSED, THEN ANOTHER |
| | FOUR TIMES THE FEE WILL BE ASSESSED. |
| | |
| | ************NEW COMMENT************ |
| | |
| | 1D. THERMAL EXPANSION CONTROL IS REQUIRED PER SECTION |
| | 607.3.2. INDICATE THE METHOD OF COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS |
| | (561) 805-6721 |
| | FAX (561) 805-6731 |
| | E-MAIL [email protected] |
