| Date |
Text |
| 2007-06-24 10:00:02 | |
| | *** UNSAT 5TH REVIEW*** |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE THERE ARE STILL MANY ITEMS FROM PREVIOUS |
| | REVIEWS WHICH STILL NEED TO BE ADDRESSED. |
| | PLEASE ALSO SEE SOME NEW NOTES AS SOME INFORMATION HAS |
| | BEEN ADDED TO PLANS AND SOME INFORMATION ON PREVIOUS |
| | PLANS AHS NOW BEEN REMOVED. |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE: PLEASE BE SURE PLANS CONTAIN ALL THE RELEVANT |
| | CODES AND YEARS IN WHICH THE PLANS ARE DESIGNED UNDER. |
| | THIS WAS NOT DONE IN FACT THE PLANS STILL STATE THE |
| | 2004 FBC WHICH THIS PROJECT IS NOT PERMITTED UNDER. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE MISPRINTS FOR THE NFPA AND NEC. |
| | PLEASE SEE COMMENT FOR LOAD CALCULATIONS AS CODE(S) |
| | STATED ARE NOT FROM THE 2002 NEC WHICH IS WHAT THIS |
| | PROJECT IS PERMITTED UNDER. |
| | |
| | THIS IS REQUIRED WHETHER OR NOT COMMENT IS MADE BY ANY |
| | OTHER TRADE. |
| | ** THIS IS UNDER THE 2001 FBC \ |
| | THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM CODES SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLANS |
| | WHICH ARE RELEVANT TO THE DESIGN OF PROJECT. |
| | 2001 FBC, 2002 NFPA-70(NEC), 2003 NFPA-101, 2002 |
| | NFPA-72 (WHERE APPLICABLE). |
| | |
| | 2) NOTE: THIS IS THE SAME COMMENT AS PREVIOUS REVIEW. |
| | PLEASE SEE PLANS STILL ARE MISSING MANY ITEMS NOT |
| | CIRCUITED. PLEASE SEE SEVERAL LIGHTS WHICH ARE SHOWN ON |
| | E-2 BUT NOT ON LIGHTING PLANS ON FIRST FLOOR AND NO |
| | CIRCUITING FOR ANY OF THESE. PLEASE SEE COMMENT FOR |
| | EMERGENCY LIGHTS ETC. |
| | |
| | **PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE** |
| | PLEASE SHOW AND COMPLETE ALL CIRCUITING ON PLANS AND |
| | CORRELATE WITH THE SUBMITTED PANEL SCHEDULE. THIS WAS |
| | STILL NOT DONE; THERE ARE SEVERAL ITEMS ON PLANS WHICH |
| | DO NOT CONTAIN CIRCUITS. PLEASE ALSO SEE CIRCUIT(S) ON |
| | PLANS WHICH DO NOT GO TO ANYTHING? PLEASE SEE THAT THE |
| | PANEL SCHEDULE SHALL BE SPECIFIC TO ALL CIRCUITS AND |
| | AREAS WHICH THEY FEED. PLEASE BE SURE THE CIRCUITS ON |
| | SCHEDULE CORRELATES TO THE PLANS FOR ANY ROOM AND AREA |
| | DESIGNATIONS. THIS REQUIRES THAT THE IDENTIFICATION FOR |
| | EVERY CIRCUIT SUPPLIED BY A PANEL-BOARD OR SWITCHBOARD |
| | BE LEGIBLE AND CLEARLY STATE THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE FOR |
| | WHICH THE CIRCUIT IS USED. CIRCUITS USED FOR THE SAME |
| | PURPOSE MUST BE IDENTIFIED AS TO THEIR LOCATION. FOR |
| | EXAMPLE, SMALL APPLIANCE BRANCH CIRCUITS CAN SUPPLY |
| | OUTLETS IN THE KITCHEN, DINING ROOM, AND KITCHEN |
| | COUNTERTOPS. IDENTIFYING THE CIRCUITS AS SMALL |
| | APPLIANCE BRANCH CIRCUITS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE; INSTEAD, |
| | THEY SHOULD BE IDENTIFIED AS ``KITCHEN WALL |
| | RECEPTACLES,'' ``DINING ROOM FLOOR RECEPTACLE,'' OR |
| | ``KITCHEN COUNTERTOP RECEPTACLES LEFT OF SINK.'' |
| | CIRCUIT DIRECTORIES CONTAINING MULTIPLE ENTRIES WITH |
| | ONLY ``LIGHTS'' OR ``OUTLETS'' DO NOT PROVIDE THE |
| | SUFFICIENT DETAIL REQUIRED BY THIS SECTION. |
| | FBC104.3.1.1 ADMIN SECT 2001. |
| | NEC 408.4, 240.4, 310.16 |
| | |
| | 3) NOTE:THIS NOTE REMAINS AS CIRCUITING HAS NOT BEEN |
| | COMPLETED ON PLANS AND REVIEW FOR COMPLIANCE CAN NOT BE |
| | DONE. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE SEE 700.12F AS THE EM AND EXT LTS SHALL BE |
| | CIRCUITED TO THE BRANCH CIRCUIT LIGHTING IN ANY ONE |
| | AREA WHERE THESE FIXTURES ARE LOCATED. |
| | PLEASE ALSO SEE COMMENT WITH RESPECT TO FIXTURES AND |
| | TYPES. |
| | THIS COMMENT WAS MADE ON PREVIOUS REVIEW FOR |
| | CIRCUITING. |
| | |
| | 4) NOTE:PLEASE SEE THE LOAD CALCULATIONS AS SUBMITTED |
| | ARE NOT CORRECT. PLEASE SEE THE 2002 NEC AND SHOW LOAD |
| | CALCULATIONS PER NEC. THE LOAD CALCULATIONS AS SHOWN DO |
| | NOT COORDINATE WITH THE NEC. PLEASE SEE THE NEC HAS |
| | SEVERAL EXAMPLES WHICH CAN BE USED. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE SHOW WINDOW LOADS DO NOT SEEM TO |
| | CORRELATE. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE INCORRECT CODE IS BEING QUOTED. (SHOULD |
| | BE 2002 NEC). |
| | PLEASE SEE NOT ALL CONTINUOUS LOADS ARE SHOWN AT 125%. |
| | |
| | *PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE SHOW LOAD CALCULATIONS, WHICH ARE IN COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH THE 2002 NEC SECTION. 220. |
| | THIS WAS NOT DONE; THE CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED ARE NOT |
| | CODE COMPLIANT IN ANY FASHION. |
| | PLEASE INDICATE HOW LOADS WERE DERIVED ON A LOAD |
| | SUMMARY BASED FROM THE NEC. 220. |
| | 220.3,220.10,220.11,220.12 220.13, ALL CONTINUOUS LOADS |
| | 125% PER 215.3, 230.42 AND LARGEST MOTOR LOAD. PLEASE |
| | INCLUDE ALL EXISTING LOADS WITH NEW LOADS BEING ADDED. |
| | WHERE IS THE REST OF THE SERVICE FOR BUILDING WHICH |
| | THIS TENANT IS BEING ADDED TO EXISTING??? |
| | |
| | 5) NOTE: THIS NOTE IS THE SAME. THE RESPONSE MENTIONS |
| | THERE IS SITE/PUBLIC LIGHTING WHICH PROVIDES THE |
| | LIGHTING, HOWEVER IT IS NOT PERMITTED TO RELY ON THE |
| | PUBLIC LIGHTING AND QUOTING THE CODE ON PLANS FOR THE |
| | CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE THIS IN LIEU OF SHOWING THE |
| | REQUIRED MINIMUM LEVELS IS NOT PERMITTED. |
| | PLEASE SEE EMERGENCY LIGHTING ON PLANS WHICH DO NOT |
| | INDICATE CIRCUITS, FIXTURES WHICH ON FIXTURE LEGEND |
| | ONLY INDICATES BEING AN EXIT LIGHT AND NOT A |
| | COMBINATION UNIT. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE CLARIFY MEANS OF EGRESS LIGHTING REQUIRED FOR |
| | REAR OF BLDG TO THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. THIS INCLUDES |
| | A BACK UP FIXTURE OF SOME TYPE. A NOTE ON PLANS WHICH |
| | MENTIONS LIGHTING TO BE INSTALLED DOES NOT COMPLY WITH |
| | SHOWING THE MINIMUM AS REQUIRED IN DESIGN. LS 101 2003, |
| | 7.8.1.3, 7.9.2.2. PLEASE KNOW, A MIN OF 10FT CANDLES IS |
| | REQUIRED UNDER NORMAL AND 1FT CANDLE UNDER EM |
| | CONDITIONS. PLEASE SHOW. |
| | |
| | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE PREVIOUS PLANS SUBMITTED THE |
| | ELECTRICAL RISER AS NEEDED HOWEVER THERE WERE SEVERAL |
| | ITEMS WHICH WERE NOT NEC COMPLIANT. PLEASE SEE THE |
| | PLANS ARE NOW MISSING THE RISER ALL TOGETHER?? PLEASE |
| | SUBMIT A COMPLETED ELECTRICAL RISER DIAGRAM NEW OR |
| | EXISTING WHICH IS CODE COMPLIANT. |
| | |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE SEE NEW RISER SUBMITTED WHICH IS NOT CODE |
| | COMPLIANT. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE SERVICE ENTRANCE CONDUCTOR SIZES ALONG |
| | WITH FEEDERS ARE NOT OF SUFFICIENT SIZE TO CONFORM TO |
| | NEC 310.16. |
| | PLEASE SEE SOME OF THE CONDUCTOR SIZES AS SHOWN ARE NOT |
| | A STANDARD CONDUCTOR SIZE FROM THE STANDARDS OF AWG |
| | (AMERICAN WIRE GAUGE) OR NEC 310.16. |
| | PLEASE SEE SOME OF THE CONDUCTORS ARE ONLY RATED FOR |
| | 200AMPS. |
| | PLEASE SEE NOTE WHICH MENTIONS *TO PANEL POLE* ? WHAT |
| | IS THIS? |
| | PLEASE COMPLETE CONDUCTORS IN GUTTER AND THE REST OF |
| | THE SERVICE. PLEASE SHOW ON PLANS. |
| | PLEASE INDICATE SIZE OF METER CAN/SERVICE BEING |
| | PROVIDED. PLEASE SEE NOTE #4 ABOVE. |
| | |
| | ? PLEASE SEE 240.4, 230.2, 110.26, 240.24, 408.7, |
| | 215.5, 230.70, 240.6, ETC. |
| | ? THERE ARE TOO MANY SECTIONS TO LIST. |
| | |
| | |
| | 7) NOTE:AS NOT RISER WAS SUBMITTED REVIEW FOR THIS |
| | PREVIOUS NOTE CAN NOT BE DONE. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE SEE MISSING EQUIPMENT GROUNDING CONDUCTOR AFTER |
| | THE FIRST MEANS OF DISCONNECT. AS THE SERVICE SHOWN IS |
| | NOT CLEAR FOR THE REST OF THE SERVICE, IT IS UNCLEAR |
| | WHAT AND WHERE EQUIPMENT GROUNDS ARE FOR THE SERVICE |
| | AND HOW THEY ARE TO BE INSTALLED AS NOT OTHER EQUIPMENT |
| | IS BEING SHOWN FOR THE SERVICE. PLEASE SEE 250.66, |
| | 250.6, 250.24B, 250.110, 250.50, 250.104 |
| | AS THE GROUNDING ELECTRODE SYSTEM IS NOT COMPLETE AT |
| | THIS TIME. |
| | |
| | 8) NOTE:PLEASE SEE THAT THE LIGHTING FIXTURES ON |
| | PLANS DO NOT CORRELATE WITH THE FIXTURE LEGEND |
| | PROVIDED. PLEASE SEE THE FIXTURE LEGEND DOES NOT |
| | PROVIDE ANY FIXTURE INFORMATION. PLEASE SEE THE PLANS |
| | DO NOT LABEL LIGHTS FOR TYPE OR EVEN AN ALPHA/NUMERIC |
| | DESIGNATION WHICH CORRELATES TO THE FIXTURE LEGEND?? |
| | MANY ITEMS FOR REVIEW OF CODE COMPLIANCE NEED TO BE |
| | DONE. |
| | **PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE** |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE AND A SYMBOL/FIXTURE LEGEND. UNABLE TO |
| | REVIEW FIXTURES FOR EM / EXT, ARE THESE COMBO UNITS?? |
| | |
| | 9) NOTE: THIS WAS NOT DONE. RESPONSE MENTIONS TO SEE |
| | PICTURES, HOWEVER NOT PICTURES WERE LOCATED AND PLANS |
| | STILL ARE REQUIRED TO SHOW THIS. |
| | 110.26, 408.7, 240.24 ETC. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE** |
| | PLEASE SHOW LOCATION OF THE EXISTING SERVICE. PLEASE |
| | ALSO SHOW AND INDICATE THE LOAD ON THE EXISTING SERVICE |
| | WITH NEW LOAD ADDED. AS NOTED ABOVE IN NOTE #4 AND NOTE |
| | #6. |
| | 220 NEC |
| | FBC ADMIN SECT 104.3.1.1 |
| | |
| | 10) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE PLANS NOW INDICATE THE CU AND |
| | DISCONNECT FOR THE UNIT ON THE SIDE OF BUILDING. THE |
| | PLANS ALSO STATE ON THE ROOF WHICH BY REVIEW OF PLANS |
| | PLACES THIS UNIT ON THE ROOF WHICH IS NOT PART OF THIS |
| | BUILDING. THIS UNIT MAY NOT BE LOCATED ON ADJACENT |
| | PROPERTY/BUILDING ROOF. AS THE UNIT HAS STILL NOT BEEN |
| | SHOWN ON PLANS FOR LOCATION AND IT SEEMS THE UNIT COULD |
| | BE LOCATED ON A SEPARATE PROPERTY FURTHER INFORMATION |
| | IS NEEDED. |
| | 440.11, 110.26, ETC. |
| | |
| | 11) NOTE:PLEASE SEE NOT ENERGY CALCULATIONS WERE |
| | SUBMITTED AND THE RESPONSE WAS THAT THESE ARE NOT |
| | NEEDED. PLEASE SEE THAT ANY CHANGE IN OCCUPANCY |
| | REQUIRES COMPLIANCE NOT ONLY WITH CHAPTER 13 OF THE FBC |
| | BUT ALL ELECTRICAL TECHNICAL CODES. |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE** |
| | PLEASE SEE THAT THIS BEING A CHANGE IN OCCUPANCY; |
| | PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETE ENERGY CALCULATIONS WHICH COMPLY |
| | WITH THE 2001 FBC CHAPTER 13. |
| | THIS WAS NOT SUBMITTED AS REQUIRED PER 415.ABCD AND |
| | 415.2 ETC. |
| | |
| | 12) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FS 553.80(2)(B) WITH RESPECT TO |
| | REPEAT COMMENTS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. |
| | PLEASE SEE AS SEVERAL COMMENTS STILL REMAIN A 4X FEE |
| | FOR THE PLAN REVIEW PORTION OF THE BASE PERMIT FEE HAS |
| | BEEN ASSESSED. THE AMOUNT OF $1080.00 WILL BE DUE UPON |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE PLANS. THIS FEE IS THE |
| | RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DESIGNER OF RECORD AND NOT THE |
| | CONTRACTOR OR OWNER AS STATED IN THE FLORIDA STATUTES. |
| | ** PLEASE KNOW THAT ONE SET OF PLANS ARE BEING RETAINED |
| | AND WILL BE PLACED WITH PREVIOUSLY RETAINED PLANS. |
| | |
| | 13) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE APPLIED VALUE FOR THE COMPLETE |
| | SCOPE OF WORK INCLUDING ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, |
| | PERMANENTLY INSTALLED EQUIPMENT; DESIGN COST FOR PLANS |
| | IS LOW. THIS IS REQUIRED WHETHER OR NOT ANY OF THESE |
| | ITEMS ARE OWNER SUPPLIED. |
| | PLEASE SEE 104.6.5 UNDER THE 2001 FBCADMIN SECTION AS |
| | ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH. |
| | |
| | |
| | ** IMPORTANT** |
| | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE |
| | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE |
| | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED |
| | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED |
| | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW |
| | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. |
| | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED |
| | FOR REFERENCE. |
| | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND |
| | AVOID ANY DELAYS. |
| | |
| | PLEASE SUBMIT THE ABOVE INFORMATION FOR |
| | REVIEW. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS, |
| | PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CALL. |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
