| Date |
Text |
| 2006-06-20 00:00:00 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001 |
| | FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS |
| | TO THE FBC2001 |
| | |
| | COMMENTS OUTSTANDING FROM PREVIOUS |
| | REVIEWS, NUMBERING REMAINING THE SAME |
| | FOR CONSITENCY: |
| | |
| | 4.)PROVIDE A SUREVY OF THIS PROPERTY |
| | SO THAT FBC TABLE 600 COMPLIANCE CAN BE |
| | DETERMINED. (1ST AND 2ND REVIEWS) |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW - ONE HAS BEEN PROVIDED, BUT |
| | CONFLICTS WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL PLAN. |
| | EXPLAIN WHY A SIGNED, SEALED SURVEY |
| | SHOWS A DISTANCE FROM THE PROPERTY LINE |
| | OF 3.4' IN THE REAR, BUT THE SITE PLAN |
| | PREPARED BY A.GARGUILIO, PE SHOWS THE |
| | BUILDING AS LESS THAN 3' FROM THE |
| | PROPERTY LINE, REQUIRING 0 OPENINGS. |
| | THIS ISSUE SHOULD HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED |
| | PRIOR TO RESUBMITTAL.CODE COMPLIANCE |
| | CANNOT BE DETERMINED DUE TO INCONSISTENT |
| | INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | SEE FBC TABLE 600.IF THE BUILDING IS |
| | LESS THAN 3', 3 HOUR WALL REQUIRED FOR |
| | TYPE V 1 HR PROTECTED, 2 HOUR FOR TYEP V |
| | UNPROTECTED. |
| | |
| | 6.)YOU HAVE DECLARED TYPE IV |
| | CONSTRUCTION.SEE FBC606.YOU HAVE |
| | COMBUSTIBLE WALLS AND ROOF, SO THIS IS |
| | NOT A TYPE IV. (1ST AND 2ND REVIEW). |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW - YOU HAVE NOW DECLARED A |
| | TYPE V, 1 HOUR PROTECTED.HOW ARE THE |
| | STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS PROTECTED FBC TABLE |
| | 600?THE DETAILS PROVIDED ARE NOT |
| | COMPLIANT FOR A 1 HOUR PROTECTED |
| | BUILLDING. |
| | |
| | SEE ALSO COMMENT 4 ABOVE.CODE |
| | COMPLIANCE CANNOT BE DETERMINED DUE TO |
| | INSUFFICIENT/CONFLICTING INFORMATION ON |
| | THE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 7.)C1 ALSO STATES THAT 1 HOUR |
| | PROETECTION REQUIRED.SHOW COMPLIANCE, |
| | EITHER BY ASSEMBLY OR CALCULATED FIRE |
| | RESISTANCE FBC709. (1ST & 2ND REVIEWS) |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW - NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 8.)YOU DECLARE AN OCCUPANT LOAD OF 71. |
| | HOW HAVE YOU ARRIVED AT THIS NUMBER? |
| | (1ST REVIEW) |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW - NOW THE OCCUPANCY IS SHOWN |
| | AS 5; 1500/300.THE BUILDING IS 11,131 |
| | SF.SEE FBC1003.1, FBC TABLE 1003.1. |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW - NOT PROPERLY ADDRESSED. |
| | OCCUPANCY IS NOW "ONE EMPLOYEE".IT IS |
| | UNCLEAR AS TO HOW AN 11K+ BUILDING CAN |
| | HAVE AN OCCUPANCY OF ONE. |
| | |
| | 13.)PRODUCT APPROVALS REQUIRED FOR THE |
| | FOLLOWING: |
| | ROOF/WALL PANELS |
| | METAL DOOR |
| | LOUVERS |
| | |
| | 2ND & 3RD REVIEWS - SUBMIT THE |
| | INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE |
| | BENCHMARK DOORS (STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | SUBMITTED). |
| | |
| | PSUBMIT STATE PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE |
| | ROLLUP DOOR, SINGLE HUNG WINDOW AND |
| | FIXED WINDOW, FAC9B72. |
| | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW - THE LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | APPLICATION IS INCOMPLETE.THERE IS NO |
| | QUALITY ASSURANCE ENTITY ON THE |
| | APPLICATION.THE LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | CANNOT BE ISSUED WITHOUT A QUALITY |
| | ASSURANCE PROGRAM, FAC9B72.UNTIL PROOF |
| | OF A PROGRAM IS PROVIDED, A REVIEW WILL |
| | NOT BE DONE ON THE APPLICATION.SEE THE |
| | VALIDATION CHECKLIST AND FAC9B72 AT |
| | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG, PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL.***THE LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | APPLICATION MAY BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO |
| | RESUBMITTAL OF THE PLANS*** |
| | |
| | 14.)SHOW THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, |
| | FBC11-4.1.3.IT APPEARS THAT THERE IS A |
| | STEP UP INTO THE BUILDING.SHOW |
| | ELEVATIONS. (1ST REVIEW) |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW - NOT ADDRESSED.THE |
| | BUILDING ELEVATIONS STILL SHOW A STEP |
| | INTO THE MAIN ENTRANCE.PROVIDE |
| | FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS. |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW - NOT ADDRESSED.PLAN STILL |
| | SHOWS STEPS AT THE FRONT DOOR.THE |
| | ROLLUP DOORS ARE NOT COMPLIANT AS AN |
| | ACCESSIBLE ENTRY. |
| | |
| | 15.)PROVIDE INFORMATION IN REGARDS TO |
| | THE DOOR HARDWARE, FBC11-4.13.9.(1ST |
| | REVIEW). |
| | |
| | 2ND & 3RD REVIEWS - NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 16.)ACCESSIBLE PARKING REQUIRED, |
| | FBC11-4.1.2(5)(A). (1ST & 2ND REVIEWS) |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW - THIS WAS ADDED TO THE PLAN, |
| | BUT DOES NOT HAVE ALL DIMENSIONS, |
| | SIGNAGE, ACCESS AISLE.IS THE |
| | ACCESSIBLE ROUTE THROUGH THE SIDE DOOR? |
| | NO ELEVATION CHANGE INFORMATION PROVIDED |
| | AS REQUESTED. |
| | |
| | |
| | 19.)SEE FBC1012.THE TWO OPENINGS IN |
| | THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING ARE NOT |
| | COMPLIANT WITH THE REQUIREMENTS FOR |
| | EGRESS DOORS.ADDRESS. |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW - EXIT LIGHTS SHOWN AT THE |
| | ROLLUP DOORS.NOT PROPERLY ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 20.)SEE ATTACHED FS553.80(2)(B).A 4X |
| | PLAN REVIEW FEE WILL BE CHARGED IF THE |
| | COMMENTS ARE NOT ADDRESSED ON THE NEXT |
| | REVIEW AS REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTE. |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW - 4X FEE AGAINST A. GARGUILO, |
| | PE APPLIED TO PERMIT. |
| | |
| | 21.)PROVIDE INFORMATION IN REGARDS TO |
| | THE DOOR HARDWARE, INCLUDING ALL OF THE |
| | SWING DOORS AND ALSO THE ROLLUP DOORS |
| | FOR THE STORAGE UNITS FBC11-4.13.9. |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW - NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 22.)(PROVIDING MORE DETAIL IN REGARDS |
| | WHAT IS REQUIRED TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | ITEM 14.) PROVIDE HEIGHT FOR THE FLOOR |
| | MOUNTING CHANNEL AT THE DOOR, STORAGE |
| | UNITS.THERE IS TO BE AN ACCESSIBLE |
| | ROUTE INTO THE STORAGE UNITS, |
| | FBC11-4.1.1(1)(A), FBC11-4.1.2(2).THE |
| | FLOOR PLAN DOES NOT SHOW A MAN DOOR, |
| | ONLY A ROLLUP DOOR, BUT A7 SHOWS A SWING |
| | DOOR AND A ROLLUP DOOR.DOORS ARE TO |
| | COMPLY WITH FBC11-4.13.AS THE DOORS |
| | ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE FLOOR PLAN, AND THE |
| | DETAILS ON A7 DO NOT SHOW DOOR SWING |
| | INFORMATION, MANEUVERING CLEARANCE |
| | CANNOT BE DETERMINED. |
| | |
| | A SWING DOOR IS REQUIRED FOR EGRESS, |
| | FBC1027.2, FBC1012.1.2. |
| | |
| | 23.)THE PLANS NOW STATE CODE SUMMARY |
| | 2004, FORMERLY STATED FBC 2001. |
| | GOVERNING CODE AT THE TIME OF |
| | APPLICATION WAS FBC2001.TO CHANGE |
| | CODE, SUBMIT A NEW PERMIT APPLICATION |
| | AND THE PLANS WILL BE REVIEWED UNDER |
| | FBC2004. |
| | |
| | 24.)THE ACCESSIBLE BATHROOM DOOR LACKS |
| | THE MANEUVERING CLEARANCE REQUIRED BY |
| | FBC11-4.13.6, FBC11 FIGURE 25. |
| | |
| | 25.)HOW DOES THE GATE OPEN?SHOW |
| | REACH RANGE, FBC11-4.2.5, FBC1104.2.6. |
| | |
| | 26.)CHANGES WERE NOT CLOUDED.THIS |
| | REQUIRED A COMPLETE NEW REVIEW.TO |
| | EXPEDITE PLAN REVIEW, CLOUD ALL CHANGES. |
| | |
| | 27.)A SET OF THE PLANS HAS BEEN |
| | RETAINED.THEY WILL BE FORWARDED TO |
| | FBPE WITH A COMPLAINT. |
| | |
| | 28.)DOORS ARE SHOWN ENCROACHING THE |
| | PROPERTY LINE, SEE FBC3203. |
| | |
| | 29.)PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FOR THE AWNING, |
| | FBC3204.3. |
| | |
| | 30.)THIS IS A 25-50% IMPROVEMENT AS |
| | PER ARCHITECT'S LETTER AND APPRAISAL, |
| | FBC3401.2.2. |
| | |
| | 31.)DECLARE A SUBCLASSIFICATION, |
| | FBC312.2. |
| | |
| | 32.)A2 NOW HAS REFERENCE TO SHUTTERS, |
| | ALSO SHOWS IMPACT.REMOVABLE SHUTTERS |
| | ON COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS ARE TO BE |
| | APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. |
| | SUBMIT A PLAN FOR INSTALLATION, SEE |
| | ATTCHED IMPLEMENTATION STANDARD, ITEM |
| | 13. |