| Date |
Text |
| 2005-07-22 00:00:00 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | PERMIT:05051005 |
| | ADD:743 BISCAYNE DR. |
| | CONT:STEPHEN ROY |
| | TEL: (561)248-9516 |
| | FL BLD CODE= 2001 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE |
| | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS |
| | |
| | REVIEW: 2ND |
| | ACTION:DENIED |
| | |
| | 1)BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY BE |
| | ISSUED, IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM |
| | BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL PERMIT |
| | SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT |
| | OFFICE, AND A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT |
| | ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT APPLICATION. |
| | PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE |
| | INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | 2) FBC 13-103.1.2 BEFORE A BUILDING |
| | PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED, THE SUBMITTED |
| | ENERGY CODE COMPLIANCE FORMS SHALL BE |
| | SIGNED BY THE BUILDING OWNER, THE |
| | OWNER'S ARCHETECT OR OTHER AUTHORIZED |
| | AGENT LEGALLY DESIGNATED BY THE OWNER. |
| | |
| | 3) WHICH ONE OF THE DECK WILL BE |
| | CONCRETE? ONE OF THE PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | SUBMITTED REFERS TO A CONCRETE DECK. |
| | ALSO NONE OF THE PRODUCT APPROVALS HAVE |
| | THE STATE COVER SHEETS. ALL PRODUCTS |
| | SUBMITTED NEEDS THE MATCHING CURRENT |
| | STATE COVER SHEET. I AM SUPPLYING YOU |
| | WITH AN EXAMPLE OF THE STATE COVER SHEET |
| | WITH ONE OF THE PRODUCT YOU SUBMITTED, |
| | SO YOU CAN SEE WHAT I AM SPEAKING OF. |
| | |
| | 4) THE PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED FOR |
| | THE METAL ROOF NEEDS A STATE APROVAL |
| | REPORT ALONG WITH THE STATE COVER |
| | SHEETS. THE MANUFACTURE INFORMATION |
| | ALONE IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. ALSO PLEASE SEE |
| | FBC.1507.6.2 DECK SLOPE. METAL ROOF |
| | SHINGLES SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED ON ROOF |
| | SLOPES BELOW 3:12. |
| | 1507.6.3 UNDERLAYMENT. UNDERLAYMENT |
| | SHALL CONFORM WITH ASTM D 226, TYPE |
| | I. |
| | 5) IS THE CARRAGE HOUSE GETTING A NEW |
| | FLAT ROOF? OR IS THE ROOF EXISTING? |
| | PLEASE CLARIFY. IF IT IS A NEW ROOF, |
| | SUPPLY PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE FLAT |
| | ROOF.WHEN SUBMITTING PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | FOR THE FLAT ROOF, PLEASE KNOW THAT |
| | SYSTEMS THAT STATES GENERAL LIMITATIONS |
| | #9 WITH -PSF LESS THAT -89PSF IS NOT |
| | ACCEPTABLE. |
| | |
| | 6) FBC 1606.2.5.GENERAL LIMITATION |
| | #9 PROHIBITS RATIONAL ANALYSIS OR |
| | EXTRAPOLATION TO ENHANCE THE UPLIFT |
| | PRESSURE AT PERIMETER AND CORNER AREAS |
| | BY REDUCING THE FASTENER SPACING IN |
| | THESE AREAS.EITHER SELECT AN |
| | ALTERNATIVE SYSTEM (OR PRODUCT APPROVAL) |
| | THAT DOES NOT CITE GENERAL LIMITATION |
| | #9.ALTERNATIVELY IF THE SELECTED |
| | SYSTEM DOES CITE GENERAL LIMITATION #9, |
| | IT MUST HAVE A MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURE |
| | THAT EXCEEDS THE PRESSURE IN ROOF ZONE 3 |
| | (TYPICALLY -89 PSF FOR MEAN ROOF HEIGHT |
| | OF 30 FEET OR LESS). |
| | |
| | 7) ON SHEET A.5, IF DOOR 'E' WILL BE |
| | USED PLEASE SUPLY PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR |
| | THAT DOOR OR YOU MAY APPLY FOR LOCAL |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL. SEE APPLICATION IN |
| | PACKAGE. |
| | |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | MYRON JACOBS |
| | TEL: (561)805-6726 |
| | FAX: (561)659-8026 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
