| Date |
Text |
| 2005-09-09 00:00:00 | BUILDING REVIEW THIRD CHECKLIST: |
| | 1- A) NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT DESCRIPTION |
| | NEEDS TO SPECIFY CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW 2 |
| | STORY HOUSE. ANOTHER INFORMATION WAS |
| | DESCRIBED, BUT THERE IS NOT INDICATION |
| | OF A NEW 2 STORY HOUSE. REVISE AS REQ'D. |
| | |
| | B) NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT NEEDS TO BE |
| | RE-RECORDED. IT EXPIRES AFTER 90 DAYS OF |
| | RECORDING IF WORK IS NOT STARTED. FL |
| | STATUTE 713.13(1)(G). |
| | |
| | 2- SETBACKS SHOWN IN SURVEY AND IN SHEET |
| | A1 SITE PLAN DON'T MATCH REVISE AS REQ'D |
| | |
| | 3- A) ROOF LOADING CHART IN PAGE A7 WAS |
| | CHANGED AND NOW IT'S MISSING THE ATTIC |
| | LIVE LOAD OF 30PSF OR 10PSF IS USED FOR |
| | STORAGE OR NON STORAGE AS REQUIRED BY |
| | TABLE 1604.1 FBC 2001. |
| | |
| | B) WIND INFORMATION ON SHEET A1 CHANGED |
| | FROM FBC 2001 TO ASCE. NEED TO IDENTIFY |
| | WHICH EDITION OF ASCE WAS USED BECAUSE |
| | THE EDITION ADOPTED BY THE CURRENT |
| | BUILDING CODE IS ASCE 7-98. |
| | |
| | 4- ROOF SHEATHING SPECS ON SHEET A7 WERE |
| | CHANGED. FASTENERS WERE CHANGED FROM 8D |
| | RING SHANK TO 8D COMMON NEED TO REVISE |
| | AGAIN TO COMPLY WITH TABLE 2306.1 OF |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2001. PREVIOUS |
| | COMMENT WAS TO SPECIFY FASTENER SPACING |
| | FOR ZONE 3 AREAS TO COMPLY WITH CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. FASTENER SPECIFED AT THAT |
| | TIME WAS OK. |
| | |
| | 5- REVISE SPECS FOR CEILING INSTALLATION |
| | AT ENTRY AND REAR PORCH AS REQ'D BY ASTM |
| | C926 AND ASTM C1063. FROM PREVIOUS |
| | COMMENT INFORMATION WAS CHANGED FOR |
| | POWER ACTUATED FASTENERS, BUT NOR FOR |
| | HAND NAILED FASTENERS. |
| | |
| | 6- PROVIDE FLORIDA OR LOCAL PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL FOR: |
| | A) ENTRY DOORS. FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | SUBMITTED IS FOR MODEL FD-6000 VINYL |
| | INSWING DOOR. DADE COUNTY NOA SUBMITTED |
| | IS FOR SWD-101 OUTSWING ALUMINUM DOOR. |
| | NEED MATCHING INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | B) FRENCH DOORS WITH AND WITHOUT |
| | SIDELITES. DADE COUNTY NOA REPORT AND |
| | DRAWINGS SUBMITTED DON'T MATCH. REVISE. |
| | |
| | C) GARAGE SIDE DOOR. |
| | |
| | D) SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS. |
| | |
| | E) WINDOW MULLIONS. |
| | |
| | F) GARAGE DOORS DESIGN PRESSURES WERE |
| | CHANGED. NOW NEEDS GARAGE DOORS THAT |
| | MEET THE CALCULATED DESIGN PRESSURES. |
| | |
| | 7- SHEET A4: TOTAL AREA CALCULATIONS |
| | DON'T ADD UP CORRECTLY. REVISE AS REQ'D. |
| | |
| | 8- CLARIFY IF USING THE 2ND FLOOR |
| | FRAMING PLAN AS A DIAPHRAGM TO RESIST |
| | THE LATERAL LOADS OR NOT. PROVIDE |
| | COMPLETE ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS |
| | SHOWING HOW DOES THE STRUCTURE COMPLIES |
| | WITH SECTIONS 2105 (LATERAL STABILITY) |
| | AND 2107 (LATERAL SUPPORT) OF FBC 2001. |
| | SEC. 104.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMETNS TO FBC |
| | 2001. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL |
| | JULIO GOMEZ AT (561)805-6712. |
