| Date |
Text |
| 2005-07-23 00:00:00 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001 |
| | FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS |
| | TO THE FBC2001 |
| | |
| | 1.)THE NOC IS EXPIRED, OVER 90 DAYS |
| | WITHOUT COMMENCING WORK, FS713.13(2). |
| | PLEASE RERECORD TO GET A NEW RECORDING |
| | DATE. |
| | |
| | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE |
| | PREVIOUS REVIEW (KEEPING THE SAME |
| | COMMENT NUMBERS): |
| | |
| | 7.)REGARDING THE ROOF PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | SUBMITTED: |
| | |
| | A. PAGE 11 OF 107 OF THE BUTLER ROOF |
| | SYSTEM SUBMITTED STATES THAT THE SYSTEM |
| | HAS A 36 PSF MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE UPLIFT. |
| | THE WEBSITE WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG HAS |
| | A DIFFERENT DOCUMENT (104 PAGES), |
| | DIFFERENT PRODUCT NAME.THE PAPERWORK |
| | SUBMITTED DOES NOT APPEAR CODE |
| | COMPLIANT.THE ENGINEER?S RESPONSE IN |
| | REGARDS TO ENHANCED FASTENING IN ZONES 2 |
| | AND 3 IS ACKNOWLEDGED BUT I AM UNABLE TO |
| | LOCATE THE DESIGN PRESSURES OF 41 AND |
| | 76.8.PLEASE HIGHLIGHT UPLIFTS IN THE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL, AND SUBMIT PAPERWORK |
| | CONSISTENT WITH THE STATE WEBSITE, SO |
| | THAT CODE COMPLIANCE CAN BE DETERMINED. |
| | |
| | B. THE PAPERWORK SUBMITTED DOES NOT |
| | MATCH THE FLORIDA STATE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | C. IF A CODE COMPLIANT PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | IS NOT SUBMITTED PRIOR TO PERMIT |
| | ISSUANCE, THE ROOF SUB PERMIT WILL BE |
| | VOIDED AND A SEPARATE PERMIT WILL BE |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | ENGINEER PROVIDED SHEET 9 OF 107 WHICH |
| | SHOWS -41 FOR A 4' SPAN.HOWEVER, THE |
| | PAPERWORK SUBMITTED IS STILL NOT THE |
| | SAME AS ON THE STATE WEBSITE FOR THIS |
| | APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | ENGINEERING FOR THE ENHANCED FASTENING |
| | FOR ZONES 2 AND 3 ARE REQUIRED TO BE |
| | SIGNED & SEALED ORIGINALS.THE TITLE |
| | BLOCK IS TO INCLUDE ALL INFORMATION |
| | REQUIRED BY FAC61G15-23.002. |
| | |
| | 9.)SEE PREVIOUS LIST, ITEM #8. |
| | FLORIDA STATE OR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | REQUIRED FOR STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS, |
| | FAC9B72.IF YOU ARE GOING TO INSTALL A |
| | TESTED/ENGINEERED PRODUCT REQUIRING |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL NOT IN ACCORDANCE WITH |
| | MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS ON THE |
| | WEBSITE, A LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL IS |
| | REQUIRED.ALSO, ALPINE CANNOT CHANGE |
| | THE SPECIFICATION FOR SIMPSON.I HAVE |
| | SPOKEN WITH JIM MAMOLA OF ONM&J AND HAVE |
| | EMAILED THE STATE TO CONFIRM MY |
| | UNDERSTANDING AND TO GET THIS RESOLVED |
| | WITH ONM&J.AS DISCUSSED WITH JIM |
| | MAMOLA, IF THIS ISSUE DOES NOT GET |
| | RESOLVED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE THE |
| | PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED WITH A PROVISO |
| | THAT THE TRUSS TIE DOWN SCHEDULE BE |
| | REVISED. |
| | |
| | THE SIMPSON CONNECTORS DO NOT HAVE |
| | FLORIDA STATE APPROVAL FOR THIS |
| | APPLICATION.THEY ARE ALSO NOT INCLUDED |
| | IN THE SIMPSON CATALOG FOR LIGHT GAGE |
| | METAL TRUSSES, SEE ATTACHED (OR SEE |
| | CATALOG ONLINE AT STRONG-TIE.COM).IT |
| | WAS MY UNDERSTANDING WITH JIM MAMOLA |
| | THAT THIS WOULD BE A PROVISO ITEM, BUT |
| | SHEET S3 HAS BEEN REVISED AND THE |
| | TRANSMITTAL LETTER STATES THAT THIS HAS |
| | BEEN ADDRESSED.ALL CONNECTORS REQUIRE |
| | FLORIDA STATE OR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | |
| | 10.)A 4X FEE IS REQUIRED TO BE CHARGED |
| | FS553.80(2)(B). |
