| Date |
Text |
| 2005-06-29 00:00:00 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001 |
| | FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS |
| | TO THE FBC2001 |
| | |
| | 1.)A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE |
| | FILED WITH THE CLERK OF COURTS BEFORE A |
| | PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. |
| | |
| | 2.)PLEASE PROVIDE THE IMPACT FEE |
| | RECEIPT (ONLY THE BILL WAS IN THE |
| | PACKAGE). |
| | |
| | 3.)SEE PREVIOUS LIST, ITEM #4, |
| | FBC3206.2, SIDEWALK OBSTRUCTION NOT |
| | ALLOWED.THE GATE WAS CHANGED ON A1 TO |
| | BE SLIDING BUT SP1 STILL SHOWS THE GATE |
| | OVER THE SIDEWALK. |
| | |
| | 4.) THE HANDRAIL EXTENSIONS ARE SHOWN AT |
| | 42IN AT THE STAIR LANDINGS ON A1. |
| | PLEASE SEE FBC11-4.9.4, CHAPTER 11 |
| | FIGURE 19, FBC1007.5.5.EXTENSIONS NOT |
| | SHOWN ON 4-A8 OR A1. |
| | |
| | 5.)THE STAIR RAIL SERVES AS A |
| | GUARDRAIL (FBC1015.1) AND IS TO BE NOT |
| | LESS THAN 42IN HIGH, FBC1015.2, A1. |
| | |
| | 6.)SECTION 2-A8 SHOULD BE REVISED TO |
| | ELIMINATE THE LAUNDRY CHUTE (STILL SHOWS |
| | THE CHUTE OPENING INTO AN EXIT ACCESS |
| | CORRIDOR FBC705.2.4.3).IF THE LAUNDRY |
| | CHUTE IS TO REMAIN, PLEASE ADD IT TO THE |
| | FLOOR PLAN AND COMPLY WITH FBC705.2.4.3. |
| | |
| | 7.)REGARDING THE ROOF PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | SUBMITTED: |
| | |
| | A. PAGE 11 OF 107 OF THE BUTLER ROOF |
| | SYSTEM SUBMITTED STATES THAT THE SYSTEM |
| | HAS A 36 PSF MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE UPLIFT. |
| | THE WEBSITE WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG HAS |
| | A DIFFERENT DOCUMENT (104 PAGES), |
| | DIFFERENT PRODUCT NAME.THE PAPERWORK |
| | SUBMITTED DOES NOT APPEAR CODE |
| | COMPLIANT.THE ENGINEER?S RESPONSE IN |
| | REGARDS TO ENHANCED FASTENING IN ZONES 2 |
| | AND 3 IS ACKNOWLEDGED BUT I AM UNABLE TO |
| | LOCATE THE DESIGN PRESSURES OF 41 AND |
| | 76.8.PLEASE HIGHLIGHT UPLIFTS IN THE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL, AND SUBMIT PAPERWORK |
| | CONSISTENT WITH THE STATE WEBSITE, SO |
| | THAT CODE COMPLIANCE CAN BE DETERMINED. |
| | |
| | B. THE PAPERWORK SUBMITTED DOES NOT |
| | MATCH THE FLORIDA STATE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | C. IF A CODE COMPLIANT PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | IS NOT SUBMITTED PRIOR TO PERMIT |
| | ISSUANCE, THE ROOF SUB PERMIT WILL BE |
| | VOIDED AND A SEPARATE PERMIT WILL BE |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 8.)THE DETAILS DATED 9/02/02 PROVIDED |
| | BY ALPINE FOR THE SIMPSON CONNECTORS |
| | SHOW A STRESS INCREASE FOR STEEL.THIS |
| | IS NOT ALLOWED FBC1609.4.3(2).SIMPSON |
| | AND USP HAVE REVISED THEIR CATALOG. |
| | |
| | 9.)SEE PREVIOUS LIST, ITEM #8. |
| | FLORIDA STATE OR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | REQUIRED FOR STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS, |
| | FAC9B72.IF YOU ARE GOING TO INSTALL A |
| | TESTED/ENGINEERED PRODUCT REQUIRING |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL NOT IN ACCORDANCE WITH |
| | MANUFACTURER?S SPECIFICATIONS ON THE |
| | WEBSITE, A LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL IS |
| | REQUIRED.ALSO, ALPINE CANNOT CHANGE |
| | THE SPECIFICATION FOR SIMPSON.I HAVE |
| | SPOKEN WITH JIM MAMOLA OF ONM&J AND HAVE |
| | EMAILED THE STATE TO CONFIRM MY |
| | UNDERSTANDING AND TO GET THIS RESOLVED |
| | WITH ONM&J.AS DISCUSSED WITH JIM |
| | MAMOLA, IF THIS ISSUE DOES NOT GET |
| | RESOLVED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE THE |
| | PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED WITH A PROVISO |
| | THAT THE TRUSS TIE DOWN SCHEDULE BE |
| | REVISED. |
| | |
| | 10.)SEE ATTACHED FS553.80(2)(B). |
