| Date |
Text |
| 2008-05-24 14:31:19 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | *******DENIED******* |
| | ROBERT BROWN(561) 805 6652 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | 4TH REVIEW OF REVISION FOR INCREASE IN NUMBER OF |
| | STORIES FROM 5 TO 8 STORIES. |
| | |
| | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001 |
| | FBC*= FLORIDA BUILD'G CODE (CITY AMEND) |
| | F.S.= FLORIDA (STATE) STATUTE |
| | |
| | |
| | FOR CONSISTENCY, THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE NUMBERED AS |
| | PER THE BUILDING PLAN REVIEW OF 3/4/08: |
| | |
| | 3)IMPACT FEES. COMMENT RESPONSE, STATING THAT THE |
| | OWNER WILL PAY IMPACT FEES, IS NOTED AND THIS OFFICE |
| | WILL DROP THIS COMMENT ONCE THE FEES ARE PAID. PREVIOUS |
| | COMMENT (RE-STATED HERE FOR INFORMATION):THE PROPOSED |
| | INCREASE IN BUILDING AREA WILL INCREASE THE IMPACT FEES |
| | DUE.THE PLANS SHALL BE TAKEN TO PALM BEACH COUNTY |
| | BUILDING DEPARTMENT FOR CALCULATION OF THE ADDITIONAL |
| | IMPACT FEES. THEY SHALL BE STAMPED AT THAT OFFICE AND A |
| | COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF WEST |
| | PALM BEACH DEPT OF CONSTRUCTION SERVICES BEFORE THE |
| | REVISED PLANS CAN BE STAMPED. |
| | |
| | 4) FBC TABLE 500ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT.FBC |
| | 503.2.6 STATES THAT THE HEIGHT OF RESIDENTIAL |
| | OCCUPANCY, IN BUILDINGS OF TYPE II CONSTRUCTION, CAN BE |
| | UNLIMITED PROVIDED THE FIRE RESISTANCE OF ALL COLUMNS |
| | IS NOT LESS THAN 3 HOURS.YOUR COMMENT MOST RECENT |
| | RESPONSE LETTER HAS BEEN NOTED, HOWEVER COLUMN TC-5 ON |
| | SHEET S-9 DOES NOT HAVE TWO PARALLEL SIDES AT LEAST 36 |
| | INCHES LONG. EVEN ALLOWING FOR BOTH LEGS OF THIS |
| | L-SHAPED COLUMN, ON SIDE IS 32 INCHES LONG.PREVIOUS |
| | COMMENT (RE-STATED HERE FOR INFORMATION):CONCRETE |
| | COLUMNS: SECTION 709.2.4 OF FBC 2001 REQUIRES A MINIMUM |
| | CONCRETE COLUMN DIMENSION OF 12 INCHES FOR A 3 HOUR |
| | FIRE RESISTANCE RATING, OR A MINIMUM CONCRETE COLUMN |
| | DIMENSION OF 8 INCHES IF TWO PARALLEL SIDES ARE AT |
| | LEAST 36 INCHES LONG.COLUMN TC-5, SHOWN ON SHEET S-9, |
| | DOES NOT COMPLY WITH EITHER REQUIREMENT OPTION.REVISE |
| | THE SIZE OF COLUMN TC-5 TO COMPLY WITH SECTION IS |
| | 709.2.4 OF FBC 2001 |
| | |
| | 13) FBC 13-103.1.2THIS COMMENT HAS STILL NOT BEEN |
| | ADDRESSED.THE SIGNATURE OF RAFAEL PENA IS STILL A |
| | PHOTOCOPIED SIGNATURE.AN ORIGINAL (WET) SIGNATURE |
| | MUST BE PUT ON THESE ENERGY CALCULATIONS BY RAFAEL |
| | PENA.WE NEED THREE COPIES OF THE ENERGY CODE |
| | COMPLIANCE FORM, EACH WITH RAFAEL PENA'S ORIGINAL (WET) |
| | SIGNATURE AND RAISED SEAL. |
| | |
| | 15) FBC 1606.1WIND LOADS ON PARKING STRUCTURE.THE |
| | COMMENT RESPONSE, STATING THAT HARDING STEEL IS |
| | CURRENTLY PRODUCING WIND LOAD CALCULATIONS, IS NOTED. |
| | THE WIND LOAD DESIGN CRITERIA/CALCULATIONS SHALL BE |
| | SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW.PREVIOUS COMMENT (RE-STATED HERE |
| | FOR INFORMATION):THE SUBMITTAL FOR THE HARDING STEEL, |
| | INC. PARKING STRUCTURE DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY WIND LOAD |
| | DESIGN CRITERIA.THE STRUCTURE MUST BE DESIGNED TO |
| | WITHSTAND A WIND SPEED OF 140 MPH (3 SECOND GUST). |
| | SUBMIT WIND LOAD DESIGN CRITERIA/CALCULATIONS.ALL |
| | STRUCTURAL SUBMITTALS MUST BE REVIEWED BY THE |
| | STRUCTURAL ENGINEER OF RECORD FOR THE PROJECT AND |
| | INCLUDE THE SHOP DRAWING REVIEW STAMP OF THAT |
| | ENGINEER. |
| | |
| | NOTE: TO EXPEDITE REVIEW OF A RESUBMITTAL WHICH |
| | REQUIRES NEW PLANS IN ORDER TO ADDRESS THE ABOVE |
| | COMMENTS, THE OLD SHEETS SHALL BE REMOVED AND THE NEW |
| | SHEETS INSERTED.ONE COPY OF EACH OLD SHEET SHOULD BE |
| | STAPLED/CLIPPED TO THE REMAINING OLD SHEETS, TO FORM A |
| | SET OF 'OLD/VOID SHEETS', FOR COMPARISON OF REVISIONS |
| | WHEN REVIEWING THE RESUBMITTED PLANS. |
| | |
| | **QUOTE PERMIT# ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE** |
| | |
| | END OF REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | THE CODE REFERENCES GIVE ADDITIONAL INFO TELEPHONE: |
| | (561) 805 6652ROBERT BROWN |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
