| Date |
Text |
| 2005-05-06 00:00:00 | BUILDING REVIEW 2ND CHECKLIST: |
| | 1- PAY IMPACT FEES. BRING BACK STAMPED |
| | DRAWINGS AND PAID RECEIPT. |
| | |
| | 2- PROVIDE RE-RECORDED NOTICE OF |
| | COMMENCEMENT. (IT'S EXPIRED). |
| | |
| | 3- GROUND FLOOR ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS |
| | CAN'T BE ACCEPTED BECAUSE PROGRAM SHOWS |
| | THAT CALCULATIONS ARE DONE USING ASCE |
| | 7-02. EDITION ADOPTED BY FBC 2001 IS |
| | ASCE 7-98. SEE CHAPTER 35 FBC 2001. |
| | |
| | 4- UPDATE TRUSS ANCHOR SCHEDULE. SEE |
| | LATEST CATALOGUE WHICH WAS REVISED TO |
| | COMPLY WITH SEC. 1609.4.3 FBC 2001. |
| | CONNECTOR HTA16 WAS REVISED TO USE 10 |
| | NAILS. ADDING MORE NAILS WILL NOT |
| | INCREASE THE UPLIFT CAPACITY OF THE |
| | CONNECTOR. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 5- BUTT GLAZING SYSTEM: |
| | A) THERE ARE 2 ASSEMBLIES SYSTEMS SHOWN |
| | ON PLANS. ONLY ONE SUBMITTED AND IT |
| | DOESN'T MATCH PLANS. |
| | |
| | B) NEED COMPLETE ENGINEERING ANALYSIS, |
| | DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIONS. SEE SECTION |
| | 2406.2 FBC 2001. |
| | **NOTE: DADE COUNTY NOA SUBMITTED CANN'T |
| | BE USED BECAUSE THE INSTALLATION IS NOT |
| | THE SAME AS APPROVED ON SUCH NOA. |
| | ENGINEER NEEDS TO PRODUCE COMPLETE SET |
| | OF DRAWINGS WITH COMPLETE SPECIFICATIONS |
| | FOR ASSEMBLIES SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | C) DESIGN PRESSURES DON'T MEET THE |
| | DESIGN PRESSURES CALCULATED ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | D) SIZE OF ASSEMBLY TESTED IS SMALLER |
| | THAN THOSE SHOWN ON PLANS. THEREFORE, IT |
| | DOESN'T COVER THEM. |
| | |
| | 6- PROVIDE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | COVER PAGE FOR THE FOLLOWING USP |
| | CONNECTORS: UMH358 AND TDX8. |
| | |
| | 7- SHUTTERS DRAWINGS NEED TO BE SIGNED |
| | AND SEALED BY THE ENGINEER AS REQUIRED |
| | BY HIM ON GENERAL NOTE #11(E). |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL |
| | JULIO GOMEZ AT (561)805-6712. |
| | |
