| Date |
Text |
| 2005-09-08 00:00:00 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | *******DENIED******* |
| | ROBERT BROWN(561) 805 6716 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001 |
| | FBC*= FLORIDA BUILD'G CODE (CITY AMEND) |
| | F.S.= FLORIDA (STATE) STATUTE |
| | |
| | FOR CONSISTENCY, THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS |
| | ARE NUMBERED AS PER THE BUILDING PLAN |
| | REVIEW OF 7/22/05: |
| | |
| | 11) THIS COMMENT HAS NOT BEEN PROPERLY |
| | ADDRESSED.SUBMITTAL OF SOME DOCUMENTS |
| | FORBUILT-UP COAL TAR ROOFING SYSTEM, |
| | DOORS AND WINDOWS IS NOTEDBUT THE |
| | FOLLOWING MUST BE ADDRESSED. |
| | A) KOPPERS (COAL TAR) BUILT-UP |
| | ROOFING.MARK PAGE 6 OF EACH COPY OF |
| | THE SUBMITTED PRODUCT TO SHOW WHICH OF |
| | THE MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURE OPTIONS IS |
| | APPLICABLE TO THIS PROJECT. SEE ITEM (F) |
| | BELOW. |
| | B) WINDOWS/DOORS.PER THE |
| | DESIGN/PROJECT TEAM REQUEST, A SEPARATE |
| | PERMIT APPLICATION WILL BE REQUIRED FOR |
| | ANY NEW WINDOWS AND EXTERIOR DOORS NOT |
| | COVERED IN THE ITEMS (C) THROUGH (E) |
| | BELOW. |
| | C) EXTERIOR DOORS.THE ARCH ALUMINUM |
| | DOCUMENT SUBMITTED FOR NEW ENTRY DOOR |
| | #101 IS NOT A PRODUCT APPROVAL AND SO |
| | DOES NOT ADDRESS THE COMMENT FROM THE |
| | PREVIOUS REVIEW (SEE 'NOTE' BELOW).AS |
| | AN EXAMPLE OF WHAT IS REQUIRED REFER TO |
| | THE SUBMITTED ROOF PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | D) MULLIONS.NEW WINDOW TYPES E, G, |
| | J, K, L, R, S ON SHEET A8.01 ALL REQUIRE |
| | VERTICAL AND/OR HORIZONTAL MULLIONS. |
| | DETAIL 1M ON SHEET A-8.03 DOES NOT SHOW |
| | A STRUCTURAL MULLION.EITHER STRUCTURAL |
| | MULLION DETAILS OR A MULLION PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED. |
| | E) DOUBLE HUNG WINDOWS.THE SUBMITTAL |
| | OF HURRICANE TEST LAB INC TEST REPORTS |
| | IS NOTED BUT THIS IS NOT A PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL AND SO DOES NOT ADDRESS THE |
| | COMMENT FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW (SEE |
| | 'NOTE' BELOW).AS AN EXAMPLE OF WHAT IS |
| | REQUIRED REFER TO THE SUBMITTED ROOF |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL.ALSO, THE TEST |
| | REPORTS ARE FOR WINDOWS THAT ARE 48-3/4" |
| | WIDE.SHEET A-8.01 SHOWS THAT THE |
| | PROPSED WINDOWS ARE UPTO 5'-0" WIDE AND |
| | SO OUTSIDE THE SCOPE OF THE SUBMITTED |
| | TEST REPORTS. |
| | F) FBC 1606.1THE CALCULATED |
| | PRESSURES FOR EACH WINDOW, EXTERIOR DOOR |
| | AND THE ROOF MUST BE STATED ON THE PLANS |
| | FOR COMPARISON WITH THE MAXIMUM DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES IN THE ABOVE-MENTION PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS. |
| | |
| | NOTE: FL. ADMIN CODE RULE 9B-72 (IN |
| | EFFECT SINCE OCTOBER 1, 2003) REQUIRES |
| | THAT PRODUCTS HAVE STATEWIDE, LOCAL OR |
| | SITE-SPECIFIC PRODUCT APPROVAL.THE |
| | SUBMITTAL SHOULD INCLUDE THE STATEWIDE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBER (FL###), |
| | AVAILABLE FROM THE DEPT OF COMMUNITY |
| | AFFAIRS PRODUCT APPROVAL WEBSITE |
| | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG/PR/PR_SRCH.ASP |
| | (IF YOU FIND THAT THE QUOTED WEB PAGE IS |
| | NO LONGER AVAILABLE, PLEASE INFORM THE |
| | PLAN REVIEWER) |
| | |
| | 19) FBC 1403SHEETS A-4.01 TO A-4.04, |
| | WALL DETAILS.THIS COMMENT HAS STILL |
| | NOT BEEN ADDRESSED.THE SUBMITTED |
| | COMMENT RESPONSE LETTER MAKES NO |
| | STATEMENT ABOUT THIS COMMENT.SUBMIT |
| | DETAILS TO SHOW MEANS OF RESTRAINT FOR |
| | THE FACE BRICK VENEER AND LIMESTONE |
| | CORNICE, FRIEZE, ARCHITRAVE, PEDIMENTS, |
| | PANELS, BELTS AND BANDS. |
| | |
| | 23) FBC 1608.2.2GUARDRAIL STRENGTH. |
| | ADDITION OF A NOTE TO THE PLANS IS NOTED |
| | BUT IT CAN BE INTERPRETED INCORRECTLY |
| | BECAUSE THE STATEMENT "(UNLESS NOTED |
| | ABOVE)" WAS OMITTED, SEE CAPITALIZED |
| | TEXT BELOW.EACH GUARDRAIL SHALL |
| | BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED FOR A |
| | CONCENTRATED LOAD OF 200 LB APPLIED IN |
| | ANY DIRECTION AT THE TOP OF THE |
| | GUARDRAIL, A CONCENTRATED HORIZONTAL |
| | LOAD OF 200 LB APPLIED ON A 1 SQ FT AREA |
| | AT ANY POINT, AND A LINE LOAD OF 50 PLF |
| | APPLIED HORIZONTALLY AT THE REQUIRED |
| | GUARDRAIL HEIGHT WITH A SIMULTANEOUS |
| | LINE LOAD OF 100 PLF APPLIED VERTICALLY |
| | DOWNWARD ON THE TOP OF THE GUARDRAIL. |
| | THESE LOADS SHALL NOT BE APPLIED |
| | SIMULTANEOUSLY (UNLESS NOTED ABOVE) BUT |
| | SHALL BE APPLIED INDIVIDUALLY TO PRODUCE |
| | MAXIMUM STRESS IN EACH OF THE COMPONENTS |
| | OR SUPPORTS.AMEND THE NOTE ON THE |
| | PLANS. |
| | |
| | 24) FBC 1608.2.1THIS COMMENT HAS NOT |
| | BEEN ADDRESSED.THE REQUIREMENTS FOR |
| | HANDRAILS ARE DIFFERENT TO THOSE FOR |
| | GUARDRAILS.EACH HANDRAIL SHALL BE |
| | DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED FOR A |
| | CONCENTRATED LOAD OF 200 LB AND A LINE |
| | LOAD OF 50 PLF.THESE LOADS SHALL NOT |
| | BE APPLIED SIMULTANEOUSLY BUT SHALL BE |
| | APPLIED INDIVIDUALLY AT ANY POINT, AND |
| | IN ANY DIRECTION, TO PRODUCE MAXIMUM |
| | STRESS IN EACH OF THE COMPONENTS OR |
| | SUPPORTS.AMEND/ANNOTATE THE PLANS. |
| | |
| | 25) FBC 3003.4SHEET A-6.11STRETCHER |
| | ACCESSIBLE ELEVATOR.CONTRARY TO THE |
| | COMMENT RESPONSE LETTER THE DETAILS/NOTE |
| | ADDED TO THE PLANS DO NOT ADDRESS THIS |
| | COMMENT.ELEVATOR NUMBER 144 SHALL BE |
| | IDENTIFIED, BY SIGNAGE, AS STRETCHER |
| | ACCESSIBLE.ANNOTATE THE PLANS TO |
| | DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE |
| | |
| | 28) FBC* 105.13.1SPECIAL INSPECTOR. |
| | THIS COMMENT HAS NOT BEEN PROPERLY |
| | ADDRESSED.THE STRUCTURAL INSPECTION |
| | PLAN ON SHEET S-1.00A IS NOTED, AS ARE |
| | THE COMMENT RESPONSE LETTER DATED |
| | 9/29/05 AND DAVID LOWE'S LETTER DATED |
| | 6/29/05 BUT NO SPECIAL INSPECTOR |
| | AGREEMENT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED.SUBMIT A |
| | SPECIAL INSPECTOR AGREEMENT WITH THE |
| | ORIGANAL SIGNATURES (AND SEALS WHERE |
| | APPROPRIATE) OF THE OWNER, THRESHOLD |
| | INSPECTOR, JOB INSPECTOR, CONTRACTOR AND |
| | ENGINEER. |
| | |
| | 31)FBC 11-4.13.6SHEET A-0.10DOOR |
| | TO THE MENS RESTROOM 106.THE SWING |
| | DIRECTION OF THIS DOOR HAS BEEN CHANGED |
| | SINCE THE LAST REVIEW.THE DOOR MUST |
| | NOW BE MOVED TO THE SOUTH SO THAT THERE |
| | IS MIN. 18" CLEARANCE BETWEEN THE STRIKE |
| | EDGE OF THE DOOR AND THE ADJACENT WALL |
| | RETURN. (FBC FIGURE 11-25). |
| | |
| | 32) TO EXPEDITE REVIEW OF A RESUBMITTAL |
| | WHICH REQUIRES NEW PLANS IN ORDER TO |
| | ADDRESS THE ABOVE COMMENTS, THE OLD |
| | SHEETS SHALL BE REMOVED AND THE NEW |
| | SHEETS INSERTED.ONE COPY OF EACH OLD |
| | SHEET SHOULD BE STAPLED/CLIPPED TO THE |
| | REMAINING OLD SHEETS, TO FORM A SET OF |
| | 'OLD/VOID SHEETS', FOR COMPARISON OF |
| | REVISIONS WHEN REVIEWING THE RESUBMITTED |
| | PLANS. |
| | |
| | **QUOTE PERMIT# ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE** |
| | |
| | END OF REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | THE CODE REFERENCES GIVE ADDITIONAL INFO |
| | TELEPHONE: (561) 805 6716ROBERT BROWN |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
