| Date |
Text |
| 2005-04-08 00:00:00 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | *******DENIED******* |
| | ROBERT BROWN(561) 805 6716 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001 |
| | FBC*= FLORIDA BUILD'G CODE (CITY AMEND) |
| | F.S.= FLORIDA (STATE) STATUTE |
| | |
| | FOR CONSISTENCY, THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS |
| | ARE NUMBERED AS PER THE BUILDING PLAN |
| | REVIEW OF 3/8/05: |
| | |
| | 1) 713.13 F.S.RESPONSE MEMO IS NOTED. |
| | THE CONTRACTOR WILL PROVIDE A COPY OF A |
| | RE-RECORDED NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT |
| | BECAUSE THE DESCRIBED IMPROVEMENT DID |
| | NOT START WITHIN 90 DAYS OF RECORDING. |
| | |
| | 3) 481.219 F.S.CERTIFICATE OF |
| | AUTHORIZATION.THIS COMMENT HAS NOT |
| | BEEN PROPERLY ADDRESSED.THE ADDITION |
| | OF A CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NUMBER |
| | TO EACH PLAN SHEET IS NOTED BUT THE |
| | NUMBER DOES NOT CORRELATE WITH THE |
| | COMPANY NAME 'DAILEY JANSSEN ARCHITECTS, |
| | P.A.' ON THE TITLE BLOCK.A SEARCH ON |
| | THE DBPR WEBSITE SHOWS THAT THE COMPANY |
| | NAME LISTED UNDER THE STATED CERTIFICATE |
| | OF AUTHORIZATION NUMBER IS DAILEY & |
| | PARTNERS ARCHITECTS, P.A.CHANGE THE |
| | COMPANY NAME ON EACH TITLE BLOCK TO |
| | 'DAILEY & PARTNERS ARCHITECTS, P.A.', OR |
| | REMOVE THE CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION |
| | NUMBER, COMPANY NAME AND COMPANY ADDRESS |
| | AND ADD THE ADDRESS OF ROGER P. JANSSEN |
| | TO EACH TITLE BLOCK (REF: 61G1-16.004 |
| | FL. ADMIN. CODE). |
| | |
| | 6) FBC 1606.1SHEET S-4, TRUSS ANCHOR |
| | SCHEDULE. THIS COMMENT HAS NOT BEEN |
| | PROPERLY ADDRESSED.IT IS NOTED THAT |
| | ANCHOR TYPE G IS SPECIFIED AS 'NU-VUE' |
| | NVUCC 223 LF.THIS ANCHOR COULD NOT BE |
| | FOUND ON THE STATEWIDE, MIAMI-DADE OR |
| | ICC-ES PRODUCT APPROVAL SEARCH WEB |
| | SITES.SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | DOCUMENTS OR SPECIFY A DIFFERENT ANCHOR. |
| | |
| | 12) FBC 2806.1SHEET A-2, FACTORY |
| | BUILT FIREPLACE.THIS COMMENT HAS NOT |
| | BEEN PROPERLY ADDRESSED.THE COMMENT |
| | RESPONSE MEMO IS NOTED, BUT THE PLAN |
| | STILL REFERS TO A FIRE-BOX BY 'SUPERIOR' |
| | WHILE THE SUBMITTED MANUFACTURERS SHEETS |
| | ARE FROM 'MAJESTIC'.ALSO, THE SHEETS |
| | MENTION A "UNIVERSAL UL LISTING" BUT |
| | GIVE NO SPECIFIC UL REQUIREMENTS THAT |
| | THE PRODUCT MEETS.PROVIDE TWO |
| | COPIES OF MANUFACTURERS DOCUMENTS WHICH |
| | SHOW THE UL TEST REPORT LISTING. |
| | |
| | 15) ENTRY DOOR.SHEET A-2 SHOWS THIS AS |
| | AN INSWING DOOR WHILE THE SUBMITTED |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL IS FOR AN OUTSWING |
| | DOOR.AMEND THE PLAN OR SUBMIT AN |
| | ALTERNATIVE PRODUCT APPROVAL.IN ANY |
| | EVENT, THE APPLICATION FOR LOCAL PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL OF THE SIGNATURE DOOR, INC |
| | IMPACT, WOOD PANEL/FRENCH DOORS HAS BEEN |
| | APPROVED.THREE COPIES ARE ATTACHED, |
| | ONE FOR THE MANUFACTURER/DISTRIBUTOR AND |
| | TWO TO BE RE-SUBMITTED WITH THESE PLANS |
| | FOR PERMITTING. |
| | |
| | 19) FRENCH DOORS.THE APPLICATION FOR |
| | LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OF THE |
| | CONSTRUCTION GLASS INDUSTRIES CORP. |
| | IMPACT ALUMINUM STOREFRONT DOORS HAS |
| | BEEN APPROVED.THREE COPIES ARE |
| | ATTACHED, ONE FOR THE |
| | MANUFACTURER/DISTRIBUTOR AND TWO TO BE |
| | RE-SUBMITTED WITH THESE PLANS FOR |
| | PERMITTING. |
| | |
| | 20) CASEMENT WINDOWS.NO PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL HAS BEEN SUBMITTED FOR THE |
| | CASEMENT WINDOWS.THE PLANS SHALL BE |
| | AMENDED IF THIS WINDOW TYPE IS NO LONGER |
| | TO BE USED(SEE COMMENT #21). |
| | |
| | 21) SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS.NO SINGLE HUNG |
| | WINDOWS APPEAR TO BE SHOWN ON THE PLANS. |
| | THE PLANS SHALL SHOW WHAT WINDOW TYPE IS |
| | TO BE USED (SEE COMMENT #20).THE |
| | SUBMITTED INNOVATIVE WINDOW CONCEPTS LLC |
| | STATEWIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FL2742 DOES |
| | NOT HAVE AN APPROVED STATUS.SUBMIT AN |
| | APPLICATION FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | OR SPECIFY AN ALTERNATIVE THAT HAS |
| | STATEWIDE OR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 22) IMPACT FEE STAMP.IT IS NOTED THAT |
| | THE PALM BEACH COUNTY IMPACT FEE STAMP |
| | IS ON THE OLD TITLE/LOCATION PLAN SHEET. |
| | INCLUDE ONE COPY OF THIS SHEET WITH EACH |
| | CURRENT PLAN SET SO THAT THE IMPACT FEE |
| | STAMP MAY BE CONSIDERED STILL |
| | APPLICABLE. |
| | |
| | 23) TO EXPEDITE REVIEW OF A RESUBMITTAL |
| | WHICH REQUIRES NEW PLANS IN ORDER TO |
| | ADDRESS THE ABOVE COMMENTS, THE OLD |
| | SHEETS SHALL BE REMOVED AND THE NEW |
| | SHEETS INSERTED.ONE COPY OF EACH OLD |
| | SHEET SHOULD BE STAPLED/CLIPPED TO THE |
| | REMAINING OLD SHEETS, TO FORM A SET OF |
| | 'OLD/VOID SHEETS', FOR COMPARISON OF |
| | REVISIONS WHEN REVIEWING THE RESUBMITTED |
| | PLANS. |
| | |
| | **QUOTE PERMIT# ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE** |
| | |
| | END OF REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | THE CODE REFERENCES GIVE ADDITIONAL INFO |
| | TELEPHONE: (561) 805 6716ROBERT BROWN |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
