| Date |
Text |
| 2005-03-02 00:00:00 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | *******DENIED******* |
| | ROBERT BROWN(561) 805 6716 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001 |
| | FBC*= FLORIDA BUILD'G CODE (CITY AMEND) |
| | F.S.= FLORIDA (STATE) STATUTE |
| | |
| | 1) THE SUBMITTED PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA# |
| | 01-0927.05 FOR THE SERIES 2400 ST |
| | SLIDING GLASS DOOR (LMI) HAS BEEN |
| | REVISED BY NOA# 02-0222.04 AS REFERENCED |
| | ON THE STATEWIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FL3390 |
| | REPLACE NOA# 01-0927.05 WITH NOA# |
| | 02-0222.04 IN EACH OF THE THREE SETS. |
| | |
| | 2) THE SUBMITTED PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA# |
| | 01-0927.04 FOR THE SERIES 2400 ST |
| | SLIDING GLASS DOOR (LMI) HAS BEEN |
| | REVISED BY NOA# 02-0222.03 AS REFERENCED |
| | ON THE STATEWIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FL3390 |
| | REPLACE NOA# 01-0927.04 WITH NOA# |
| | 02-0222.03 IN EACH OF THE THREE SETS. |
| | |
| | 3) THE SUBMITTED PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA# |
| | 03-1023.02 FOR THE SERIES FX 345 WINDOW |
| | WALL SYSTEM (SMI) SHOWS AN EXPIRY DATE |
| | OF JUNE 10, 2004 AND THE DRAWING SHEETS |
| | DO NOT CARRY THE MIAMI DADE PRODUCT |
| | CONTROL DIVISION STAMP.AN UPDATED |
| | VERSION OF THIS NOA IS AVAILABLE AT |
| | HTTP://WWW.MIAMIDADE.GOV/BUILDINGCODE/LI |
| | BRARY/PRODUCTCONTROL/NOA/03102302.PD |
| | PROVIDE AN UP-TO-DATE COPY OF NOA# |
| | 03-1023.02 IN EACH OF THE THREE SETS. |
| | |
| | 4) FL. ADMIN CODE RULE 9B-72. |
| | A SEARCH AT THE DEPT OF COMMUNITY |
| | AFFAIRS PRODUCT APPROVAL WEBSITE |
| | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG/PR/PR_SRCH.ASP |
| | SHOWS NO MATCHING STATEWIDE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL FOR COMMERCIAL DOOR |
| | INTERNATIONAL, INC. PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | NOA# 01-0829.05 FOR SERIES HC-5000 |
| | ALUMINUM OUTSWING DOOR. |
| | SPECIFY AN ALTERNATIVE THAT HAS |
| | STATEWIDE OR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL.IF |
| | YOU FIND THAT THE QUOTED WEB PAGE IS NO |
| | LONGER AVAILABLE, PLEASE INFORM THE PLAN |
| | REVIEWER. |
| | |
| | 5) FBC 1606.1.1 WIND LOADS.SHEET W-1 |
| | OF THE SUBMITTED R.C ALUMINUM |
| | CALCULATION REPORT (PREPARED BY XCEL |
| | ENGINEERING CORP.) MAKES REFERENCE TO |
| | "...COMPONENTS AND CLADDING ELEMENTS OF |
| | LOW RISE BUILDINGS AND BUILDINGS WITH |
| | H<= 60 FT".THIS BUILDING IS NOT LOW |
| | RISE.REVISE THE CALCULATIONS TO REMOVE |
| | REFERENCE TO LOW RISE BUILDINGS AND |
| | CLARIFY THAT THE WIND LOADS HAVE BEEN |
| | DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASCE 7-98 |
| | SECTION 6.5. |
| | |
| | 6) FBC 1606.1.1 WIND LOADS.SHEETS W-1 |
| | AND W-2 OF THE SUBMITTED R.C ALUMINUM |
| | CALCULATION REPORT LIST DESIGN PRESSURES |
| | WHICH ARE IN SOME CASES SIGNIFICANTLY |
| | LOWER THAN THOSE ON STRUCTURAL PLAN |
| | SHEETS S7-1 TO S7-4, PREPARED BY RAUL A. |
| | PUIG, P.E. (ENGINEER OF RECORD).IN |
| | THOSE CASES WHERE THE ALLOWABLE |
| | PRESSURES FOR PROPOSED WINDOW/DOOR ARE |
| | LESS THAN THE GREATER OF THE XCEL |
| | ENGINEERING AND RAUL PUIG DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES THIS HAS BEEN COMMENTED ON |
| | SEPERATELY BELOW.IF BOTH DOCUMENTS ARE |
| | TO BE CONSIDERED VALID, THE GREATER LOAD |
| | |
| | 7) WINDOW TYPE WSL/8CR.THE NEGATIVE |
| | DESIGN PRESSURE STATED IN THE XCEL |
| | CALCULATION SHEET W-1 IS -81.7 PSF WHILE |
| | STRUCTURAL PLAN SHEET S7-4 STATES |
| | -113.5 PSF (PRESSURE ZONE 1).THE |
| | SUBMITTED PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA# |
| | 02-1216.03 STATES A DESIGN LOAD CAPACITY |
| | |
| | OF -100 PSF WHICH IS LESS THAN THAT |
| | REQUIRED BY THE PLANS PREPARED BY THE |
| | ENGINEER OF RECORD (-113.5 PSF) |
| | |
| | 8) WINDOW TYPE WSL/3DR.THE NEGATIVE |
| | DESIGN PRESSURE STATED IN THE XCEL |
| | CALCULATION SHEET W-2 IS -81.1 PSF WHILE |
| | STRUCTURAL PLAN SHEETS S7-1 AND S7-2 |
| | STATE -106.0 PSF (PRESSURE ZONES 9 AND 1 |
| | RESPECTIVELY).THE SUBMITTED PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL NOA# 02-1216.03 STATES A DESIGN |
| | LOAD CAPACITY OF -100 PSF WHICH IS LESS |
| | THAN THAT REQUIRED BY ON THE PLANS |
| | PREPARED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD |
| | (-106.0 PSF) |
| | |
| | 9) TO EXPEDITE REVIEW OF A RESUBMITTAL |
| | WHICH REQUIRES NEW PLANS IN ORDER TO |
| | ADDRESS THE ABOVE COMMENTS, THE OLD |
| | SHEETS SHALL BE REMOVED AND THE NEW |
| | SHEETS INSERTED.ONE COPY OF EACH OLD |
| | SHEET SHOULD BE STAPLED/CLIPPED TO THE |
| | REMAINING OLD SHEETS, TO FORM A SET OF |
| | 'OLD/VOID SHEETS', FOR COMPARISON OF |
| | REVISIONS WHEN REVIEWING THE RESUBMITTED |
| | PLANS. |
| | |
| | |
| | **QUOTE PERMIT# ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE** |
| | |
| | END OF REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | THE CODE REFERENCES GIVE ADDITIONAL INFO |
| | TELEPHONE: (561) 805 6716ROBERT BROWN |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
