| Date |
Text |
| 2005-04-15 00:00:00 | THIRD CHECKLIST: |
| | 1- TRUSS ANCHOR SCHEDULE: |
| | A) CONNECTOR #5 HUSC412 COULD NOT BE |
| | FOUND IN THE CATALOGUE. |
| | |
| | B) COPIES OF SIMPSON CATALOGUE SUBMITTED |
| | CLEARLY INDICATE THAT THESE ARE WOOD TO |
| | WOOD CONNECTORS. AND , NONE OF THEM IS A |
| | HUSC412. |
| | |
| | C) NEED TO SPECIFY WOOD TO MASONRY |
| | CONNECTOR. SEE SIMPSON CATALOGUE FOR |
| | WOOD TO MASONRY APPLICATIONS. |
| | |
| | D) CONNECTOR #5 HUSC412 SHOWN ON THE |
| | CONNECTOR SCHEDULE CALLS FOR 10 TAPCONS, |
| | WHILE FOOTNOTE **CALLS FOR 12 TAPCONS. |
| | INFORMATION DOESN'T MATCH. |
| | |
| | E) ON PREVIOUS CHECKLIST IT WAS |
| | REQUESTED TO UPDATE TRUSS ANCHOR |
| | SCHEDULE BY CHECKING USP/SIMPSON LATEST |
| | CATALOGUES WHICH WERE REVISED TO COMPLY |
| | WITH SEC. 1609.4.3 FBC 2001. OR, |
| | OTHERWISE, TO PROVIDE COMPLETE |
| | ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS SHOWING |
| | COPMPLIANCE WITH SEC. 1609.4.3 FBC WHEN |
| | TYPE AND NUMBER OF NAILS ARE DIFFERENT |
| | THAN THOSE ALREADY TESTED AND PUBLISHED |
| | BY THE MANUFACTURER. |
| | THIS WAS NOT DONE. PROVIDE COMPLETE |
| | ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS SHOWING HOW |
| | DOES CONNECTOR #5 PROVIDE SPECIFIED |
| | LOADS USING 10 (OR 12) TAPCONS 3/16 X 2 |
| | 1/4, WHILE 2005 SIMPSON CATALOGUE PAGE |
| | 128 SHOWS CONNECTOR HU410 (WHICH IS THE |
| | CONNECTOR THAT NEEDS TO BE SPECIFIED FOR |
| | THE DESIRED APPLICATION) SHOWS THAT |
| | USING 18 TITEN 1/4 X 2 3/4 WILL BE GOOD |
| | FOR 1505 UPLIFT. |
| | SEC. 104.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC |
| | 2001. |
| | |
| | F) CALLED SIMPSON COMPANY AND WAS TOLD |
| | THAT THE "S" SPECIFIED ON CONNECTORS HUS |
| | STANDS FOR SHEAR. CONNECTOR HUS412 WAS |
| | TESTED FOR SHEAR IN WOOD TO WOOD |
| | APPLICATIONS AND NOT IN WOOD TO MASONRY |
| | APPLICATIONS. THEREFORE, THIS |
| | ADDITTIONAL LOAD SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED |
| | IN MASONRY CONNECTORS. THEREFORE, |
| | CONNECTOR SHALL NOT HAVE THE "S" WHEN |
| | SPECIFIED FOR MASONRY APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | G) REVIEWALL TRUSS ANCHOR SCHEDULE AND |
| | FOOTNOTES AND REVISE/UPDATE AS REQUIRED |
| | TO MEET MANUFACTURER TESTED & PUBLISHED |
| | VALUES OR PROVIDE COMPLETE ENGINEERING |
| | ANALYSIS WHEN DEVIATING FROM THE |
| | CATALOGUE. SECTION 104.2.1.2 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2001. |
| | |
| | 2- SURVEY SUBMITTED DOESN'T MATCH PLANS. |
| | A) IT DOESN'T INCLUDE THE COVERED PORCH. |
| | B) DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON SURVEY DON'T |
| | MATCH PLANS. IDENTIFY WHICH DIMENSIONS |
| | ARE CORRECT. THE ONES IN THE SURVEY OR |
| | THE ONES IN PLANS AND REVISE AS REQ'D. |
| | |
| | 3- MISSING FLORIDA OR LOCAL PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL FOR: |
| | A) ENTRY DOORS. NOT SUBMITTED THIS TIME. |
| | B) SINGLE FRENCH DOORS AS SHOWN ON |
| | PLANS. PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED IS FOR |
| | DOUBLE DOORS WITH SIDELITES OR SINGLE |
| | DOOR WITH SIDELITES. |
| | |
| | 4- NEED TO REVISE DETAIL FOR ARCHED |
| | WINDOWS. SEE ARCHED WINDOW PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL FOR SPACING REQUIRED TO FASTEN |
| | WINDOW TO STRUCTURAL BUCK AND REVISE 2X4 |
| | BLOCKING SPACING REQUIRED TO RECEIVE |
| | WINDOW FASTENERS. |
| | |
| | 5- OWES $3552.55 WHICH WAS NOT PAID AT |
| | TIME OF PERMIT APLICATION PLUS |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL FEES. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL |
| | JULIO GOMEZ AT (561)805-6712. |