City of West Palm Beach eGovPlus

Plan Review Notes

Plan Review Notes For Permit 05011550
Permit Number	05011550
Review Stop	B
Sequence Number	3

Notes

Date	Text
2006-04-14 00:00:00	**CORRECTIONS**

	SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
	561-805-6724 [email protected]

	FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001
	FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS
	TO THE FBC2001

	FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW, NUMBERING TO
	REMAIN THE SAME FOR CONSISTENCY

	1. ADDRESSED.

	2. DECLARE AN OCCUPANCY AND BUILDING
	TYPE FOR FBC TABLE 600 AND TABLE 500
	REVIEW.PLEASE NOTE THAT FOR TABLE 600
	REVIEW THE FLORIDA EAST COAST RAIL ROAD
	IS CONSIDERED PRIVATE PROPERTY.

	(SECOND REVIEW) NOT ADDRESSED.SEE
	CHAPTER 3, CHAPTER
	6, CHAPTER 5.PROVIDE INFORMATION ABOUT
	WHAT WILL BE STORED IN THIS BUILDING.

	(THIRD REVIEW) NOT ADDRESSED PROPERLY.
	A RESPONSE LETTER FROM THE ARCHITECT
	STATING THAT THERE ARE NO OPENINGS
	WITHIN 3' DOES NOT SHOW CODE COMPLIANCE.
	SHOW THE PROPERTY LINE IN RELATION TO
	THE BUILDING OPENINGS ON THE PLANS.
	THERE IS A DOOR NEAR THE SOUTH EAST
	CORNER WHICH MUST BE OVER THREE FEET
	FROM THE PROPERTY LINE PER TABLE 600.
	ALSO SHOW THE PROPERTY LINE ON THE
	FOUNDATION PLAN.IT APPEARS THAT ONE OF
	THE FOOTINGS CROSSES OVER THE PROPERTY
	LINE.

	PROVIDE INFORMATION IN REGARDS TO WHAT
	WILL BE STORED IN THE BUILDING (NOT
	ADDRESSED FROM LAST REVIEW, SEE FBC312,
	FBC308.

	DECLARE A SUBCLASSIFICATION, FBC312.

	THE OCCUPANCY NUMBERS DECLARED ARE LESS
	THAN THE FBC TABLE 1003.1, FBC 1003.1.

	3. ADDRESSED.

	4. THE WALL PANELS, ROOF PANELS, DOORS,
	WINDOWS, IMPACT PROTECTION, AND OVERHEAD
	DOOR REQUIRE FLORIDA OR LOCAL PRODUCT
	APPROVAL, FAC9B72.
	WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG FOR MORE
	INFORMATION.

	(SECOND REVIEW)NOT ADDRESSED.A
	PERMIT CANNOT BE
	ISSUED UNTIL THIS ITEM IS ADDRESSED.
	PLEASE SEE FAC9B72.

	(THIRD REVIEW)A STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL
	2001 WAS SUBMITTED FOR WEDGCOR.NO
	OTHER STATE APPROVALS PROVIDED.PLEASE
	SEE FAC9B72.IF A STATE PRODUCT
	APPROVAL IS NOT AVAILABLE, PLEASE ADVISE
	AND A LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL WILL BE
	ISSUED USING THE NOA.

	5. ADDRESSED.

	6. ADDRESSED.

	7. PROVIDE THE INFORMATION REQUIRED BY
	FBC1606.1.7 ON BOTH PLANS.

	(SECOND REVIEW) NOT ADDRESSED.CODE
	COMPLIANCE CANNOT
	BE DETERMINED IF THERE WIND DESIGN
	CRITERIA IS NOT STATED.

	(THIRD REVIEW)

	WIND PRESSURES FOR THE OPENINGS HAVE
	BEEN HANDWRITTEN ON THE PLAN.PLEASE
	CLOUD AND INITIAL.OTHER INFORMATION IS
	STILL LACKING.SEE FBC1606.1.7.THIS
	IS TO BE INCLUDED ON BOTH SETS OF PLANS;
	THE PLAN PREPARED BY ROBERT L. BELL
	ARCHITECT (OR THE PLANS PREPARED BY
	NALYWAJKO & ASSOCIATES) AND THE PLAN FOR
	THE WEDGCOR BUILDING.

	THIS IS THE THIRD REQUEST FOR MR.
	RICHARD JOYCE, PE TO PROVIDE WIND DESIGN
	INFORMATION.

	8. ADDRESSED.

	9. ADDRESSED.

	10. THERE ARE TO BE TWO INDEPENDENT
	EXITS, FBC1004.2.

	THERE ARE TO BE TWO ACCESSIBLE EXITS,
	FBC11-4.1.3(9).SEE DEFINITION OF
	EGRESS IN CHAPTER 11.SHOW COMPLIANCE
	ON THE PLAN.IT IS STILL NOT CLEAR AS
	TO WHICH DOORS ARE ACCESSIBLE.YOU
	INDICATE 'ACCESSIBLE ROUTE' WITH NO
	ELEVATIONS.THE PAVING & DRAINAGE PLAN
	SHOWS A FFE OF 17-17.6 FOR THE BUILDING,
	AND 18 SHOWN IN THE PARKING AREA.IS
	THE X SUPPOSED TO BE OVER THE CURB, NOT
	THE PAVEMENT?THE SLOPE OF THE SIDEWALK
	IS NOT CLEAR.THE CURB IS NOT
	CONTINUOUS SO THERE SHOULD BE AN
	ELEVATION CHANGE, BUT THAT ISN'T CLEAR.
	CLEARLY SHOW WHICH DOORS
	ARE ACCESSIBLE, AND THAT THEYARE
	INDEPENDENT EXITS REMOTELY LOCATED
	FBC1004.1.4, LEADING TO THE PUBLIC WAY
	AS REQUIRED BY DEFINITION, DO NOT EXCEED
	TRAVEL DISTANCE FBC TABLE 1004 OR COMMON
	PATH OF TRAVEL FBC1004.1.3.

	11. PROVIDE INFORMATION IN REGARDS TO
	THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, ACCESSIBLE
	PARKING.

	(SECOND REVIEW) ACCESSIBLE ROUTE NOT
	SHOWN FBC11-4.1.2(1) AND (2).
	ACCESSIBLE PARKING DOES NOT COMPLY WITH
	CITY STANDARD, SEE ATTACHED.
	SHOW ACCESSIBLE ROUTE INTO THE BUILDING.
	NO FLOOR ELEVATIONS PROVIDED.

	(THIRD REVIEW)PLANS SHOULD SHOW CODE
	COMPLIANCE.THERE APPEARS TO BE A 6'
	INCH ELEVATION DIFFERENCE ON THIS
	PROPERTY AND IT IS NOT CLEAR HOW THIS IS
	ADDRESSED FOR ACCESSIBILITY.STATING
	THAT SOMETHING IS AN ACCESSIBLE PATH IS
	NOT SUFFICIENT.PROVIDE ELEVATIONS,
	ELEVATION CHANGE OR SLOPE AS REQUESTED.

	THE PAVING & DRAINAGE PLAN ACCESSIBLE
	PARKING DETAIL DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE
	CITY OF WPB STANDARD.

	12. ADDRESSED.

	13. ADDRESSED.

	14. A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE
	FILED WITH THE CLERK OF COURTS BEFORE A
	PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED.

	NEW COMMENTS, SECOND REVIEW:

	15. ADDRESSED.

	16. DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ARCHITECT
	AND SUBMITTED FOR PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO
	BE SIGNED, SEALED, DATED ORIGINALS
	FAC61G16.

	(THIRD REVIEW) PLANS SUBMITTED ARE NOT
	SEALED.

	17. ADDRESSED.

	18.ADDRESSED.

	19.ADDRESSED.

	20.SEE ATTACHED FS553.80(2)(B).A 4X
	PLAN REVIEW WILL BE CHARGED IF THE
	COMMENTS ARE NOT ADDRESSED A THIRD TIME.

	(THIRD REVIEW) A 4X FEE HAS BEEN
	CHARGED.NO RESUB FEE DUE FOR FOURTH
	REVIEW.

	NEW COMMENT, THIRD REVIEW

	21.CLARIFY SCOPE OF WORK.ONE PLAN
	STATES THAT THERE IS A SLAB ONLY, FLOOR
	PLAN SHOW EXISTING INTERIOR PARTITIONS,
	AND I HAVE BEEN INFORMED THAT THE
	INTERIOR PARTITIONS SHOWN AS EXISTING
	ARE NOT THERE NOW.PROVIDE DETAILS FOR
	NEW WALLS, CONNECTIONS FROM EXISTING TO
	NEW WALLS IF ANY.

	22.A VALUATION ADJUSTMENT HAS BEEN
	DONE (USING SBCCI VALUATION TABLE FROM
	2003).A BILL INCLUDING THE ADDITIONAL
	FEES DUE AS WELL AS THE 4X FEE CHARGED
	IS ATTACHED.THIS MUST BE PAID PRIOR TO
	RESUBMITTAL.

	23.EFFECTIVE JAN 1, 2006 THE SEAL FOR
	THE ENGINEER IS TO STATE "LICENSE", NOT
	"CERTIFICATE" FAC61G15-23.

	A COPY OF THE PLAN HAS BEEN RETAINED.

	WHEN RESUBMITTING, ALL CHANGES ON THE
	PLAN ARE TO BE CLEARLY INDICATED WITH
	CLOUDS AND REVISION NUMBERS.REPLACE
	ONLY SHEETS WHICH HAVE CHANGED.SUBMIT
	OLD SHEETS SEPARATELY.TO EXPEDITE PLAN
	REVIEW, PROVIDE A TRANSMITTAL LETTER
	EXPLAINING HOW EACH ITEM HAS BEEN
	ADDRESSED.