| Date |
Text |
| 2005-01-24 00:00:00 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | 1.)THE PAPERWORK SUBMITTED TO THE |
| | STATE OF FLORIDA APPEARS NONCOMPLIANT |
| | FOR THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH.THE |
| | CITY IS IN THE WIND BORNE DEBRIS |
| | REGION, |
| | 140 3 SECOND GUST.DESIGN PRESSURE |
| | LIMITATIONS ARE NOT PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 2.)PROVIDE A DIAGRAM OF THE ROOF, |
| | SHOWING ZONES (WITH DIMENSIONS) AND |
| | ROOF |
| | PITCH.OR, PROVIDE ENGINEERING SHOWING |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH WORST CASE PRESSURES |
| | FROM FBC TABLE1606.2B (-68.1). |
| | |
| | 3.)THE ENGINEERING SUBMITTED |
| | SUPPLEMENTAL TO THE FLORIDA PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL DOCUMENTATION ALSO APPEARS |
| | NONCOMPLIANT FOR THE 3/12 PORTION OF |
| | THE |
| | ROOF.SEE ATTACHED FBC TABLE 1606.2B. |
| | SHEET 1, ITEM #5 PROVIDES DPS OF |
| | 32.3/-41.2 PSF, 140 MPH EXPOSURE C. |
| | SHEET 10, 140 MPH REFERS TO "APPLIED |
| | LOAD" OF 40.WHY ARE THESE NUMBERS IN |
| | CONFLICT?HOW HAS THE DP FOR 140MPH, |
| | EXPOSURE C BEEN DETERMINED?IS THIS A |
| | DESIGN CRITERIA FOR THE JOB OR A |
| | PRODUCT |
| | LIMITATION?SEE ATTACHED TABLE; DPS |
| | FOR |
| | A 3/12 PITCH ARE GREATER THAN THAT FOR |
| | ZONE 3, EXPOSURE B. |
| | |
| | 4.)THE LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL FORM |
| | SUBMITTED STATES THAT STRUCTURAL DESIGN |
| | SERVICES IS PROVIDING QUALITY |
| | ASSURANCE. |
| | THE THIRD PARTY QUALITY ASSURANCE |
| | ENTITY |
| | MUST BE AN APPROVED ENTITY LISTED ON |
| | THE |
| | WEBSITE, WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. |
| | PLEASE NOTE THAT THE QUALITY ASSURANCE |
| | FOR THIS MANUFACTURER STATED ON THE |
| | WEBSITE IS KEYSTONE CERTIFICATIONS. |
| | |
| | 5.)FOR THE LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL, |
| | EVERY SHEET OF THE ENGINEERING IS TO BE |
| | SIGNED, SEALED AND DATED, |
| | FAC61G15-23.002. |
| | |
