| Date |
Text |
| 2005-01-13 00:00:00 | DENIED |
| | |
| | 1)A RECORDED COPY OF THE NOTICE OF |
| | COMMENCEMENT MUST BE SUBMITTED BEFORE A |
| | PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. |
| | |
| | 2) PLAN SHEETS SD1 AND SD2 DO NOT HAVE |
| | THE ORIGINAL WET SIGNATURE OF THE |
| | ENGINEER AS REQUIRED BY FAC |
| | 61G15-23.002. |
| | |
| | 3) ON SHEET RF-1 THE UPLIFT VALUE FOR |
| | THE USC 53 CONNECTOR INCLUDES THE ONE |
| | THIRD INCREASE IN THE STEEL CALCS. WHICH |
| | IS NOT ALLOWED BY FBC 1609.4.3. THE |
| | MAXIMUM UPLIFT IS 11,150# PER THE |
| | MANUFACTUER'S CATALOG. |
| | |
| | 4) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS, KEY PLANS AND INSTALLATION |
| | SCHEDULES FOR THE STORM PANELS OR APPLY |
| | UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT. |
| | |
| | 5) THE PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE GARAGE |
| | DOORS HAVE THE WRONG EVALUATION REPORTS. |
| | SUBMIT THE PROPER EVALUATION/TEST REPORT |
| | AND INSTALLATION DRAWINGS THAT ARE ON |
| | THE STATE PROD. APPROVAL WEBSITE. |
| | |
| | 6) THE MIAMI-DADE NOA FOR THERMA-TRU |
| | CORPORATION SUBMITTED WITH THE STATE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER SHEET FOR |
| | BENCHMARK APPEAR TO BE TWO DIFFERENT |
| | PRODUCTS. SUBMIT DOCUMENTATION THAT |
| | THESE ARE THE SAME COMPANY AND THE |
| | PRODUCTS. |
| | |
| | 7) SUBMIT STATE/LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | FOR THE STRUCTURAL WINDOW MULLIONS. |
| | |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL |
| | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW |
| | (561)805-6714 |
