| Date |
Text |
| 2005-01-13 00:00:00 | DENIED |
| | |
| | 1)A RECORDED COPY OF THE NOTICE OF |
| | COMMENCEMENT MUST BE SUBMITTED BEFORE A |
| | PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. |
| | |
| | 2) PLAN SHEETS SD1 AND SD2 DO NOT HAVE |
| | THE ORIGINAL WET SIGNATURE OF THE |
| | ENGINEER AS REQUIRED BY FAC |
| | 61G15-23.002. |
| | |
| | 3) ON SHEET RF-1 THE UPLIFT VALUE FOR |
| | THE USC 53 CONNECTOR INCLUDES THE ONE |
| | THIRD INCREASE IN THE STEEL |
| | CALCULATIONS |
| | WHICH IS NOT ALLOWED BY FBC 1609.4.3. |
| | THE MAXIMUM UPLIFT IS 11,150# PER |
| | MANUFACTURER'S CATALOG. |
| | |
| | 4) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS, KEY PLANS AND INSTALLATION |
| | SCHEDULES FOR THE STORM PANELS OR APPLY |
| | UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT. |
| | |
| | 5) THE PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE GARAGE |
| | DOORS HAVE THE WRONG EVALUATION |
| | REPORTS. |
| | SUBMIT THE PROPER EVALUATION/TEST |
| | REPORT |
| | AND INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS THAT ARE |
| | POSTED ON THE STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | WEBSITE. |
| | |
| | 6) THE MIAMI-DADE NOA FOR THERMA-TRU |
| | CORPORATION ATTACHED TO THE STATE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR BENCHMARK APPEAR |
| | TO |
| | BE TWO DIFFERENT PRODUCTS. SUBMIT |
| | DOCUMENTATION THAT THESE ARE THEY SAME |
| | COMPANY AND THE SAME PRODUCT. |
| | |
| | 7) SUBMIT STATE/LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | FOR STRUCTURAL WINDOW MULLIONS. |
| | |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL |
| | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW |
| | (561)805-6714 |
