| Date |
Text |
| 2006-02-23 00:00:00 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | *******DENIED******* |
| | ROBERT BROWN(561) 805 6716 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001 |
| | FBC*= FLORIDA BUILD'G CODE (CITY AMEND) |
| | F.S.= FLORIDA (STATE) STATUTE |
| | |
| | FOR CONSISTENCY, THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS |
| | ARE NUMBERED AS PER THE BUILDING PLAN |
| | REVIEW OF 11/11/05: |
| | |
| | 4) NOTE THAT THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, |
| | IMPACT FEE RECEIPT AND SPECIAL INSPECTOR |
| | AGREEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED BEFORE A |
| | PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED: |
| | (A) THE SUBMITTED NOTICE OF |
| | COMMENCEMENTSTATES "...LIMITED TO |
| | CONCRETE FOUNDATION PILES ONLY".A NEW |
| | ONE MUST BE RECORDED |
| | (B) THE IMPACT FEE PAYMENT RECEIPT MUST |
| | BE SUBMITTED.THE IMPACT FEE STAMP IS |
| | CURRENTLY ON THE VOIDED COPY OF SHEET |
| | A0.00 AND HAS BEEN MARKED "KEEP FOR |
| | IMPACT FEE STAMP".THAT SHEET SHOULD BE |
| | ATTACHED TO ONE OF THE THREE PERMIT PLAN |
| | SETS. |
| | (C) THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR AGREEMENT WAS |
| | SUBMITTED ON A 1994 VERSION OF THE FORM |
| | WHICH IS NO LONGER IN USE.THIS WILL BE |
| | DISCUSSED WITH WITH THE THRESHOLD |
| | INSPECTOR PROGRAM MANAGER, HAROLD |
| | PISKURA, TO DETERMINE IF IT ACCEPTABLE. |
| | ALTERNATIVELY, PLEASE COLLECT A CURRENT |
| | FORM (JULY 1, 2004 VERSION) FROM THIS |
| | OFFICE, HAVE IT COMPLETED WITH ORIGINAL |
| | SIGNATURES (NOTARIZED OR SEALED AS |
| | APPROPRIATE) AND THEN SUBMIT IT. |
| | |
| | 10) PRODUCT APPROVALS: |
| | (A) NONE OF THE SUBMITTED PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS INCLUDE THE STATEWIDE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL OR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER |
| | SHEET REQUIRED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE RULE |
| | 9B-72.FOR MORE DETAILS, SEE THE NOTE |
| | AT THE END OF THE PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | (B) ROOF TILE. THE WIND UPLIFT |
| | PRESSURES SHOWN ON ARCHITECTURAL PLAN, |
| | SHEET A1.02, FOR THE TILED ROOF AREAS, |
| | ARE UP TO 150 PSF (UPLIFT).SHEET 2 OF |
| | THE SUBMITTED MONIER LIFETILE SPANISH |
| | 'S' CONCRETE ROOF TILE PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | NOA# 02-1205.07 STATES THAT THE PRODUCT |
| | IS FOR USE IN LOCATIONS WERE THE DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES DO NOT EXCEED THOSE OBTAINED |
| | BY CALCULATIONS IN COMPLIANCE WITH RAS |
| | 127.SUBMIT CALCULATIONS (SEE RAS 127) |
| | TO SHOW THAT THE PROPOSED ROOF TILE IS |
| | SUITABLE FOR THE UPLIFT PRESSURES OF |
| | THIS APPLICATION. |
| | ALSO, SHEET A8.23. DETAILS 3, 4, AND 5 |
| | REFER TO THE STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR |
| | THICKNESS OF DENSE DECK AND ATTACHMENT |
| | OF TILES.THIS INFORMATION COULD NOT BE |
| | FOUND ON THE STRUCTURAL PLANS.SUBMIT |
| | DETAILS. THE NOTES ON SHEET S-1.25 REFER |
| | TO THE USE OF FIRE-RETARDANT TREATED |
| | PLYWOOD WHICH IS IN CONFLICT WITH THE |
| | ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND IS NOT A |
| | PERMITTED MATERIAL FOR USE IN |
| | CONSTRUCTION TYPE I.AMEND THE |
| | STRUCTURAL PLANS. |
| | EITHER A STATEWIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL, OR |
| | LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL, COVER SHEET |
| | SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH EACH COPY, SEE |
| | COMMENT (A) ABOVE. |
| | (C) MODIFIED BITUMEN ROOFING SYSTEM. |
| | EITHER A STATEWIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL, OR |
| | LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL, COVER SHEET |
| | SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH EACH COPY OF THE |
| | SUBMITTED JOHNS MANVILLE CORP. MODIFIED |
| | BITUMEN ROOFING SYSTEM PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | NOA# 04-0401.04, SEE COMMENT (A) ABOVE. |
| | (D) LOADING AREA SECTIONAL DOOR S28. |
| | NO PRODUCT APPROVAL WAS SUBMITTED FOR |
| | THIS DOOR.SUBMIT A PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | FOR THIS 14'-0" X 16'-0" SECTIONAL DOOR. |
| | (E) TRASH TERMINATION/HOLDING/WASTE |
| | CONTAINER ROOM DOORS.THESE DOORS ARE |
| | ON THE PARKING GARAGE VEHICLE ENTRY |
| | DRIVEWAY AND SO WILL BE SUBJECT TO WIND |
| | PRESSURES.SHEET A9.11, DOOR SCHEDULE, |
| | SHOWS EACH OF THESE DOORS AS A PAIR OF |
| | 6' WIDE DOORS.NO PRODUCT APPROVAL WAS |
| | SUBMITTED FOR A DOOR OF THIS WIDTH. |
| | AMEND THE DOOR SCHEDULE OR SUBMIT AN |
| | APPROPRIATE PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | (F) STAIRWELL DOORS S1, R1 AND R15. |
| | SHEET A9.11, DOOR SCHEDULE, SHOWS THESE |
| | DOORS AS TYPE I, WHICH HAS A 10"X 10" |
| | VISION PANEL.NO PRODUCT APPROVAL HAS |
| | BEEN SUBMITTED FOR A HOLLOW METAL DOOR |
| | WITH VISION PANEL.SUBMIT A PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL. |
| | (G) STEAM ROOM DOOR.THIS DOOR IS |
| | REFERENCED R14 ON SHEET A9.11 (DOOR |
| | SCHEDULE).IS IT THE SAME DOOR THAT IS |
| | CALLED UP AS DOOR R4 ON SHEET 4.72?THE |
| | DOOR SCHEDULE SHOWS DOOR R14 AS TYPE R, |
| | WHICH IS SHOWN AS "SUN-DOR-CO #SD-502". |
| | THAT MANUFACTURER AND REFERENCE DOES NOT |
| | CORRELATE WITH THE SUBMITTED ARCH |
| | ALUMINUM MEDIUM STILE ALUMINUM DOOR |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA# 01-1102.01. |
| | CLARIFY THE DOOR REFERENCE NUMBER ON |
| | SHEET A9.1 OR A4.72 AND REMOVE THE |
| | INCORRECT DOOR MANUFACTURER REFERENCE |
| | FOR DOOR R14. |
| | (H) LOBBY GARAGE ENTRY DOOR P8.SHEET |
| | A9.11, DOOR SCHEDULE, SHOWS THIS DOOR AS |
| | TYPE S (SOLID CORE WOOD DOOR).SHEET |
| | A4.14 SHOWS THE DOOR LEADING FROM THE |
| | GARAGE INTO THE CONDITIONED SPACE.THE |
| | GARAGE IS OPEN AT THE VEHICLE ENTRY |
| | DRIVEWAYS, SO DOOR P8 WILL BE SUBJECT TO |
| | WIND PRESSURES. SUBMIT A PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL FOR THIS DOOR TYPE OR REVISE |
| | THE SHEET A4.14 AND THE DOOR SCHEDULE |
| | (SHEET A9.11).NOTE THAT THIS DOOR IS |
| | ALSO REQUIED TO BE 1-1/2 HOUR FIRE |
| | RATED. |
| | (I) LOUVERS, SHEET A8.44.NO PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED FOR THE |
| | LOUVERS.SUBMIT APPROPRIATE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS. |
| | (J) WINDOW, STORE FRONT AND SLIDING |
| | GLASS DOOR PRODUCT APPROVALS.IN |
| | ADDITION TO THE COMMENTS BELOW, PLEASE |
| | NOTE THAT, ACCORDING TO THE WIND |
| | PRESSURES STATED ON ARCHITECTURAL PLAN |
| | SHEET A1.02, SOME OF THESE PRODUCTS WILL |
| | BEREQUIRED TO HAVE A DESIGN PRESSURE |
| | RATING OF UP TO +100 PSF (POSITIVE) AND |
| | -140 PSF (NEGATIVE).IT WOULD APPEAR |
| | THAT THE SUBMITTED PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | WERE NOT CHECKED, PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL, TO |
| | ENSURE THAT THE PROPOSED PRODUCTS CAN |
| | WITHSTAND THE STATED WIND PRESSURES FOR |
| | THIS BUILDING.PLEASE CHECK THE DESIGN |
| | PRESSURE RATING OF ALL PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS, PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL. |
| | (K) WINDOW WALL.THE SUBMITTED GAMMA |
| | U.S.A. SERIES 50.2 SMALL MISSILE IMPACT |
| | WINDOW WALL PRODUCT APPROVAL NO. 03-0345 |
| | AND SERIES 61 LARGE MISSILE IMPACT |
| | WINDOW WALL PRODUCT APPROVAL NO. 03-0348 |
| | BOTH STATE, ON THEIR RESPECTIVE COVER |
| | SHEETS, THAT THEY ARE "ONE-TIME PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL" APPLICATIONS FOR A PROJECT |
| | CALLED "JADE RESIDENCE" 1331 BRICKELL |
| | BAY DR, MIAMI, FL.THESE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS ARE NOT VALID FOR OTHER |
| | PROJECTS.SUBMIT VALID PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS. |
| | (L) WINDOW WALL.THE DRAWING SHEETS 1 |
| | TO 8 SUBMITTED AS PART OF THE GAMMA |
| | U.S.A. SERIES 50.4A SMALL MISSILE IMPACT |
| | WINDOW WALL PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA# |
| | 04-1006.01 ARE NOT COPIES OF THE ONES |
| | REVIEWED BY MIAMI-DADE CODE |
| | COMPLIANCE OFFICE (BCCO).UNLIKE THE |
| | DRAWINGS INCLUDED WITH THIS PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL ON THE MIAMI-DADE BCCO WEBSITE, |
| | THEY DO NOT HAVE THE MIAMI-DADE BCCO |
| | APPROVAL STAMP.SUBMIT PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS WITH DRAWINGS THAT INCLUDE THE |
| | PRODUCT CERTIFICATION AGENCY STAMP OF |
| | APPROVAL.ALSO, SEE COMMENT (J) ABOVE |
| | AND COMMENT (A) ABOVE. |
| | (M) WINDOW WALL WITH TILT WINDOW. |
| | SUBMITTAL OF FENESTRATION TESTING |
| | LABORATORY (FTL) REPORT 02-0729.01, FOR |
| | GAMMA U.S.A SERIES 55.2 WINDOW WALL WITH |
| | TILT WINDOW, IS NOTED BUT THIS IS NOT A |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL. SUBMIT A PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL FROM AN APPROVED PRODUCT |
| | CERTIFICATION AGENCY, SEE COMMENT (A) |
| | ABOVE. |
| | (N) GAMMA U.S.A SERIES 73 SLIDING GLASS |
| | DOOR. SUBMITTAL OF FENESTRATION TESTING |
| | LABORATORY (FTL) REPORT 03-0821.01, IS |
| | NOTED BUT THIS IS NOT A PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL. SUBMIT A PRODUCT APPROVAL FROM |
| | AN APPROVED PRODUCT CERTIFICATION |
| | AGENCY, SEE COMMENT (A) ABOVE. |
| | (O) GAMMA U.S.A SERIES 76 ALDORA |
| | ALUMINUM SLIDING GLASS DOOR.THE |
| | DRAWING SHEETS 1 TO 8 SUBMITTED AS PART |
| | OF THE PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA# |
| | 04-1006.03 ARE NOT COPIES OF THE ONES |
| | REVIEWED BY MIAMI-DADE CODE COMPLIANCE |
| | OFFICE (BCCO).UNLIKE THE DRAWINGS |
| | INCLUDED WITH THIS PRODUCT APPROVAL ON |
| | THE MIAMI-DADE BCCO WEBSITE, THEY DO NOT |
| | HAVE THE MIAMI-DADE BCCO APPROVAL STAMP. |
| | SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVALS WITH DRAWINGS |
| | THAT INCLUDE THE PRODUCT CERTIFICATION |
| | AGENCY STAMP OF APPROVAL.ALSO, SEE |
| | COMMENT (J) ABOVE AND COMMENT (A) ABOVE. |
| | |
| | NOTE: FL. ADMIN CODE RULE 9B-72 (IN |
| | EFFECT SINCE OCTOBER 1, 2003) REQUIRES |
| | THAT PRODUCTS HAVE STATEWIDE, LOCAL OR |
| | SITE-SPECIFIC PRODUCT APPROVAL.THE |
| | SUBMITTAL SHOULD INCLUDE THE STATEWIDE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBER (FL###), |
| | AVAILABLE FROM THE DEPT OF COMMUNITY |
| | AFFAIRS PRODUCT APPROVAL WEBSITE WWW. |
| | FLORIDABUILDING.ORG/PR/PR_APP_SRCH.ASPX |
| | FOR PRODUCTS WHICH DO NOT HAVE STATEWIDE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL, LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | CAN BE ACHIEVED IF THERE IS A QUALITY |
| | ASSURANCE PROGRAM IN PLACE WITH A STATE |
| | APPROVED QUALITY ASSURANCE ENTITY. |
| | LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL WILL ALLOW A |
| | PRODUCT TO BE USED, IN ACCORDANCE WITH |
| | THE TEST CRITERIA, THROUGHOUT THE |
| | JURISDICTION OF WEST PALM BEACH. |
| | LOCAL AND SITE SPECIFIC PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | APPLICATION FORMS ARE AVAILABLE FROM |
| | THIS OFFICE.APPROVED QUALITY ASSURANCE |
| | ENTITIES ARE LISTED ON THE DCA WEBSITE: |
| | FLORIDABUILDING.ORG/PR/PR_ORG_SRCH.ASPX |
| | |
| | 25) NFPA 823-2.4.3.1REFUSE CHUTE. |
| | THIS COMMENT HAS NOT BEEN ADDESSED. THE |
| | COMMENT RESPONSE REFERING TO APPROVAL BY |
| | THE CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS |
| | AND APPEALS (CBAA) IS NOTED.PLEASE |
| | SUBMIT A COPY OF THE CBAA FINAL |
| | DECISION, FOR THE PERMIT FILE,SO THAT |
| | IT MAY BE DEEMED UNNECESSARY, FOR THIS |
| | PROJECT ONLY, TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM 6" |
| | CLEARANCE BETWEEN THE OPEN CHUTE LOADING |
| | DOOR AND CLOSED SERVICE OPENING ROOM |
| | DOOR. |
| | |
| | 43) TO EXPEDITE REVIEW OF A RESUBMITTAL |
| | WHICH REQUIRES NEW PLANS IN ORDER TO |
| | ADDRESS THE ABOVE COMMENTS, THE OLD |
| | SHEETS SHALL BE REMOVED AND THE NEW |
| | SHEETS INSERTED.ONE COPY OF EACH OLD |
| | SHEET SHOULD BE STAPLED/CLIPPED TO THE |
| | REMAINING OLD SHEETS, TO FORM A SET OF |
| | 'OLD/VOID SHEETS', FOR COMPARISON OF |
| | REVISIONS WHEN REVIEWING THE RESUBMITTED |
| | PLANS. |
| | |
| | **QUOTE PERMIT# ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE** |
| | |
| | END OF REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | THE CODE REFERENCES GIVE ADDITIONAL INFO |
| | TELEPHONE: (561) 805 6652ROBERT BROWN |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
