| Date |
Text |
| 2005-02-11 00:00:00 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | PERMIT: 04110183 |
| | ADD: 3900 N FLAGLER DR. BLDG# 1 |
| | CONT: MANHATTEN CONSTRUCTION |
| | TEL: (813)927-0209 |
| | FL BLD CODE= 2001 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE |
| | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW |
| | ACTION: DENIED |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE |
| | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY |
| | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER |
| | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUM- |
| | BER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION |
| | MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICA |
| | TION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND |
| | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK |
| | YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | 1) COMMENT #1 FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW, |
| | PROVIDE NOC RECORDED WITH THE CLERK OF |
| | COURT BEFORE A PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. |
| | |
| | 2) COMMENT #7 FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW, |
| | A202, DEALS WITH LISTING THE DOOR RATING |
| | IN EITHER MINUTES OR HRS. THE HEADING OF |
| | THIS COLULM STILL INDICATE DOOR "LABEL" |
| | THE SECOND ISSUE IS THE BUILDINGS |
| | WITH THE DOORS OF THE TERMINATION ROOM |
| | THAT ARE ON THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING |
| | |
| | HAVE NO RATING. SEE TABLE 705.1.2. |
| | |
| | 3) COMMENT #8 FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW, |
| | TRASH CHUTE A503 IS TO INDICATE A 2HR |
| | RATING THROUGH TO THE UNDERSIDE OF THE |
| | ROOF SHEATHING,THE RATING IS MISSING |
| | AT THE BOTTOM OF THE TRUSSES, SEE |
| | 705.2.3.4.2. |
| | |
| | 4) COMMENT #17 FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW, |
| | A502 PROVIDE INFO FOR ACCESS HATCH, |
| | HATCH DOES NOT NEED TO BE 2 HR RATING |
| | SINCE IT IS NO LONGER PART OF THE SHAFT. |
| | |
| | 5)COMMENT # 23 FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW, |
| | 1503.4.2 OVERFLOW DRAINS SHALL BE THE |
| | SAME SIZE AS ROOF DRAINS, INSTALLED WITH |
| | THE INLET FLOW LINE LOCATED 2" ABOVE THE |
| | LOWEST POINT OF THE ROOF LINE. OVERFLOW |
| | SCUPPERS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 4"IN |
| | HEIGTH AND SHALL BE PLACED IN WALLS OR |
| | PARARETS WITH THE INLET FLOW LINE |
| | NOT LESS THAN 2" ABOVE THE ROOF SURFACE. |
| | THE EMERGENCY OVERFLOW DRAIN IS |
| | INDICATED ON THE "P" SHEETS BUT THE |
| | HEIGHT FROM THE ROOF LINE IS NOT |
| | INDICATED, IT COULD BE 6" ABOVE THE ROOF |
| | DRAIN. THE INTENT IS NOT TO HAVE OVER 4" |
| | |
| | OF WATER ON THE ROOF. WITH THE SLOPED |
| | ROOF SYSTEM IF THE EMERGENCY DRAIN IS |
| | LEVEL WITH THE ROOF LINE YOU WILL HAVE A |
| | MAXIMUM OF 4"OF WATER AT THE ROOF |
| | DRAIN. |
| | |
| | 6)COMMENT #24 FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW, |
| | 1503.4.4 PROTECTION AGAINST DECAY & |
| | TERMITES. CONDENSATE LINES & ROOF DOWN |
| | SPOUTS SHALL DISCHARGE AT LEAST 1 FT. |
| | AWAY FROM THE STRUCTURE SIDEWALL, |
| | WHETHER BY UNDERGROUND PIPING, TAIL EX- |
| | TENSIONS, OR SPLASH BLOCKS. |
| | THE PLUMBING PAGES SHOW COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH SPLASH BLOCKS FOR DOWN SPOUTS, BUT |
| | THE MECHANICAL DOESN'T INDICATE |
| | COMPLIANCE FOR CONDENSATE DRAINS. |
| | |
| | 7)COMMENT #25 FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW, |
| | BUILDING # 1 SHOWS COMPLIANCE, BUT THE |
| | OTHER BUILDINGS DO NOT HAVE ANYNOTES |
| | OR DETAIL INDICATING COMPLIANCE. |
| | 1511.7 ROOF MOUNTED MECHANICAL UNIT |
| | S SHALL BE MOUNTED ON CURBS RAISED A |
| | MINIMUM OF 8 INCHES ABOVE THE ROOF SUR- |
| | FACE, OR WHERE ROOFING MATERIALS EXTEND |
| | BENEATH THE UNIT, ON RAISED EQUIPMENT |
| | SUPPORTS PROVIDING A MINIMUM CLEARENCE |
| | HEIGHT IN ACCORDANCE WITH TABLE 1511.7. |
| | MECH. 301.13 WIND RESISTANCE MECHANICAL |
| | EQUIPMENT, APPLIANCES AND SUP PORTS THAT |
| | ARE EXPOSED TO WIND SHALL BE DESIGNED |
| | AND INSTALLED TO RESIST THE WIND |
| | PRESSURES ON THE EQUIPMENT & THE |
| | SUPPORTS AS DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE |
| | WITH THE FL BLD CODE. THIS MAY BE ACCOMP |
| | LISHED BY DESIGN OR BY APPLICATION OF |
| | SECTION 301.13.1. |
| | |
| | 8)COMMENT #26 MEAN ROOF HEIGHT IS ABOVE |
| | 35', THE WEST PALM AMENDMENTS ARE GOOD |
| | TO 35', ENGINEER TO INDICATE NAILING |
| | PATTERNS FOR ABOVE 35'. TABLE 2306.1* |
| | |
| | 9)COMMENT #27 FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW, |
| | THE STRUCTURAL PLANS DO NOT PROVIDE A |
| | ROOF FRAMING PLAN WITH THE TRUSSES |
| | IDENTIED, NOR THE LOADS TO BE IMPOSED, |
| | UPLIFT, GRAVITY NOR F1OR F2. THE ROOF |
| | TRUSSES ARE PART OF THE MAIN WIND FORCE |
| | RESISTING SYSTEM FOR THE STRUCTURE. |
| | THESE LOADS NEED TO BE IDENTIFIED TO |
| | ALLOW FOR THE CORRECT ANCHORS TO BE |
| | EMBEDDED INTO THE CONCRETE POUR. SEE |
| | FBC 1606.2.4 |
| | |
| | 10)COMMENT # 28 FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW |
| | THERE IS NO ANCHOR SCHEDULE IDENTIFYING |
| | THE MANUFACTURER, MODEL NUMBER, AND THE |
| | ALLOWABLE LOADSFOR ANCHORS THAT ARE |
| | PRINTED IN THE MANUFACTURERS 2005 |
| | CATALOG. |
| | |
| | 11)COMMENT #28C) FROM THE PREVIOUS |
| | REVIEW, SHEAT S9-1 "SEE LATEST SIMPSON |
| | CATALOG FOR FASTENER REQUIREMENTS |
| | CORRESPONDING TO SIMSON CONNECTORS |
| | SPECIFIED. THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL |
| | HASN,T GIVEN ANY VALUES FOR UPLIFT OR |
| | OTHER VALUES OF RESISTANCE. NOR HAS THE |
| | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL PROVIDED A ANCHOR |
| | SCHEDULE INDICATING WHAT VALUES THAT |
| | THEY PREFER TO USE.104.2.1 W.P.B. |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE CODE DRAWINGS & |
| | SPECIFICATIONS SHALL CONTAIN |
| | INFORMATION, IN THE FORM OF NOTES OR |
| | OTHERWISE, AS TO THE QUALITY OF |
| | MATERIALS, WHERE QUALITY IS ESSENTIAL TO |
| | CONFORMITY WITH THE TECHNICAL CODES. |
| | SUCH INFORMATION SHALL BE SPECIFIC |
| | AND THE TECHNICAL CODES "SHALL NOT BE |
| | CITED AS A WHOLE OR IN PART, NOR THE |
| | TERM "LEGAL" OR ITS RQUIVALENT BE USED |
| | AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR SPECIFIC |
| | INFORMATION". |
| | |
| | 12) COMMENT #29A) FROM THE PREVIOUS |
| | REVIEW. A-451 DETAIL #4, THE ATTACHMENT |
| | OF THE FOAM BRAKET,PLANS DO NOT |
| | PROVIDE WHAT TYPE OF ATTACHMENT METHOD |
| | TO BE USED OR QUANITITY OF FASTENERS. |
| | |
| | 13) COMMENT #30 FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW |
| | A442 DETAIL #8, THE BAHAMA SHUTTER IS TO |
| | BE ATTACHED TO A 2X_, THE SHUTTER |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL PROVIDES FASTENERS FOR |
| | THE SHUTTER BUT THE DETAIL LACKS HOW |
| | THE FRAMING MEMBER IS ATTACHED TO THE |
| | STRUCTURE. FASTENER, SIZE & SPACING. |
| | |
| | 14) COMMENT #32 FROM THE PEVIOUS REVIEW, |
| | PROVIDE UNITITY OF TITLE FOR LOTS: |
| | 74-43-43-09-01-000-0110 |
| | 74-43-43-09-01-000-0090 |
| | |
| | 15) COMMENT #31 FROM THE PEVIOUS REVIEW, |
| | BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY BE |
| | ISSUED, IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM |
| | BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL PERMIT |
| | SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT |
| | OFFICE, AND A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT |
| | ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT APPLICATION. |
| | PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE |
| | INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | THESE COMMENTS MAY OR MAY NOT PERTAIN TO |
| | BUILDING #1 SINCE THE PLANS HAVE ALL |
| | BUILDINGS COMBINED, OTHER COMMENTS MAY |
| | APPEAR THAT WERE NOT PART OF THE |
| | PREVIOUS REVIEW SINCE ALL BUILDINGS ARE |
| | INCORPORATED INTO ONE PLAN. PLEASE BREAK |
| | THE MEP INTO A SINGLE UNIT, PLANS ARE TO |
| | CUMBERSOME TO REVIEW AS IS, |
| | |
| | *********NOTE*******NOT ALL ROLLS OF |
| | PLANS ARE COMPLETE,SOME ARE MISSING |
| | THE STRUCTURAL PAGES TOTALLY. |
| | |
| | *********NOTE******PRODUCT APPROVALS (3) |
| | SETS OF PRODUCT APPROVALS WILL BE |
| | REQUIRED FOR PROJECT. |
| | |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | JIM WITMER |
| | TEL: (561)805-6715 |
| | FAX: (561)659-8026 |
| | |
