| Date |
Text |
| 2005-01-19 00:00:00 | PORTOFINO PHASE II LAND, LTD |
| | |
| | BUILDING TYPE I |
| | |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | |
| | PERMIT: 04090383BLDG# 22 |
| | ADD: 4650 PORTOFINO WAY |
| | |
| | PERMIT: 04090384BLDG# 23 |
| | ADD: 4635 PORTOFINO WAY |
| | |
| | |
| | CONT:EPOCH PROPERTIES, INC. |
| | TEL: (407)718-8932 |
| | |
| | FL BLD CODE= 2001 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE |
| | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW |
| | ACTION: DENIED |
| | |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE |
| | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY |
| | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL |
| | LETTER |
| | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT |
| | NUM- |
| | BER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION |
| | MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR |
| | SPECIFICA |
| | TION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE |
| | FOUND |
| | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. |
| | THANK |
| | YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | AS DISCUSSED EARLIER, PLANS ARE NOW IN |
| | FOR PLAN REVIEW, NOT FOR PERMIT. |
| | CONTRACTOR TO INDICATE IF PLAN REVIEW IS |
| | TO BE CONVERTED INTO A "MASTER" OR IF |
| | INDIVIDUAL BUILDING PERMITS WITHWITH |
| | (3) SETS OF PLANS FOR EACH BUILDING |
| | SHALL BE SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | SINCE THE PLANS ARE BEING SUBMITTED AS A |
| | PLAN REVIEW, NEW PERMIT APPLICATIONS |
| | SHALL BE SUBMITTED BY THE CONTRACTOR . |
| | THESE NEW PERMIT APPLICATIONS ARE TO |
| | REFLECT THE BUILDING NUMBER AND |
| | APPROPRIATE ADDRESS ON PORTOFINO WAY. |
| | NO PERMITSOR PLAN REVIEWS ARE TO |
| | REFLECT A MILITARY TRAIL ADDRESS. PLEASE |
| | |
| | CORRECT THE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATIONS |
| | WITH THE SITE ADDRESS AND THE CORRECT |
| | PROPERTYCONTROL NUMBER.SITE ADDRESS |
| | SHALL BE 4600 PORTOFINO WAY, THE SAME AS |
| | THE CLUBHOUSE. |
| | |
| | 2) PROVIDE NOC RECORDED WITH THE CLERK |
| | OF COURT BEFORE A PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. |
| | |
| | 3) COMMENT # 3 FROM THE PREVIOUS |
| | REVIEW, |
| | DEELS WITH SHEET A-U13 DETAILS INDICATE |
| | THE USE OF SEMCO STRAPS, DESIGNER HAS |
| | CHANGED THE STRAP TO USP TAPL-14 BUT THE |
| | VALUES TAKEN ARE HIGHER THAN ALLOWED IN |
| | THE 2005 USP CATALOG.1609.4.3 LOAD |
| | REDUCTIONS, STEEL INCREASES CA NOT BE |
| | TAKEN. |
| | |
| | 4) COMMENT # 5 FROM THE PREVIOUS |
| | REVIEW, |
| | SHEET A-T1.3 / A-U13, |
| | USP- RT-16 HIGH VALUE |
| | USP- RT-24 NOT IN CATOLOG |
| | USP DTC IS A OLD REFRENCE, CURRENT |
| | STOCK |
| | NUMBER IS TR-2, PROVIDE LOADS TO BE |
| | RESISTED SEE FOOTNOTES 2 & 3. |
| | USP- RT-24 NOT IN CATOLOG |
| | PROVIDE CURRENT LISTINGS FOR PRODUCTS |
| | LISTED ABOVE. |
| | |
| | 5) COMMENT # 6 FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW |
| | |
| | DEALS WITH FIRE SPRINKLER PLANS |
| | REQUIRED. ATTACH THE FIRE SPRINKLER |
| | PLANS TO THE BUILDING SETS OF PLANS, TO |
| | |
| | HAVE A COMPLETE SUBMITTAL PACKAGE. |
| | |
| | 6) COMMENT # 8 FROM THE PREVIOUS |
| | REVIEW, |
| | DEALS WITH HURRICANE SHUTTERS ON THE |
| | FIRST FLOOR. BUILDING OFFICAL NEIL |
| | MELICK HAS CHANGED THE REQUIREMENTS FOR |
| | LARGE PROJECTS SINCE THE LAST |
| | HURRICANES. PRESENTLY HE ISN'T |
| | ACCEPTING |
| | ANYTHING ON THE FIRST FLOOR FOR WINDOW |
| | OR DOOR PROTECTION EXCEPT FOR LARGE |
| | MISSLE IMPACT WINDOWS AND DOORS, AS HAS |
| | BEEN THE POLICY FOR THE 2ND AND 3RD |
| | FLOORS. |
| | |
| | 7)COMMENT # 10 FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW, |
| | THE SOILS REPORTS TO BE SUBMITTED SHALL |
| | HAVE ORIGINAL SIGNNATURE & SEAL. |
| | PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS,REPORTS OR |
| | OTHER DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY THE DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONAL AND BEING FILED FOR PUBLIC |
| | RECORD SHALL HAVE THE SIGNATURE AND |
| | SEAL OF THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AFFIXED |
| | TO THE DOCUMENT. |
| | FL STATE STAT: 61G15-23.002 ENGINEERS |
| | FL ATATE STAT: 61G16.003 ARCHITECTS |
| | |
| | 8) COMMENT # 11 FROM THE PEVIOUS |
| | REVIEW, |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH |
| | PERMIT APPLICATION AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003 |
| | ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR INFORMATION |
| | PLEASE SEE THE STATE WEBSITE AT |
| | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. PRODUCTS WITH |
| | STATEWIDE APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE |
| | SUBMITTED WITH A COVER SHEET THAT LISTS |
| | THE PRODUCT IDENTITY NUMBER FROM THE |
| | STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT HAVE |
| | STATEWIDE APPROVAL, SUBMIT AN APPLICA- |
| | TION FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OR SITE |
| | SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE 9B-72. SEE |
| | ATTACHMENT. WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG |
| | |
| | 9) COMMENT # 12 FROM THE PREVIOUS |
| | REVIEW |
| | FL BLD CODE 1606.1.5: COMPONENTS & |
| | CLADDING, PROVIDE 2 COPIES(3 IF THRESH- |
| | OLD OR RESIDENT INSPECTOR) OF PRODUCT |
| | TESTING REPORTS,MISSING REPORTS ARE AS |
| | FOLLOWS: |
| | A) FRONT DOOR REPORT- MASONITE REPORT |
| | IS ILLEGIBLE PROVIDE CLEAR COPIES, |
| | NO POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE PRESSURES |
| | INDICATED ON REPORT. |
| | B) CLOSPAY GARAGE DOOR- MISSING THE |
| | FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL COVERSHEET |
| | C) ROOFING ASSEMBLIES |
| | 1) INDICATE THE METHOD OF ATTACHMENT, |
| | |
| | FOAM, SCREWS OR NAIL TYPE.SEE |
| | LIMITATIONS PSF |
| | 2) MISSING THE FL COVERSHEET |
| | 3) MISSING REPORTS FOR UNDERLAYMENT |
| | D) NOTHING ON SLIDING GLASS DOORS, |
| | IT DEPENDS ON WHICH BINDER YOU LOOK |
| | |
| | IN, STILL NO FL COVER SHEET. |
| | E) WINDOWS MISSING COVERSHEET FOR ALL |
| | MODELS. |
| | F) STRURTURAL COMPONENTS- MISSING ALL |
| | INFORMATION FL COVER SHEET & REPORT. |
| | G) RAILINGS MISSING ALL INFO, NO FL |
| | COVERSHEET OR PRODUCT TESTING REPORT |
| | H) SOFFIT- NO INFORMATION- |
| | |
| | 10) COMMENT13 FROM THE PREVIOUS |
| | REVIEW |
| | RESPONCE THAT A NEW GEOTECHNICAL REPORT |
| | WAS TO BE SUBMITTED? NO |
| | 10B) DEALS WITH THE STUCCO STOPPING |
| | SHORT OF THE SOIL BY 4". THE GYPSUM |
| | BOARD (2506) STOPS SHORT 8" BUT UNLESS |
| | THE STUCCO IS DIRECTLY APPLIED TO |
| | MASONARY AND NOT OVER 5/8" THICK A 4" |
| | TERMITE INSPECTION AREA IS TO BE LEFT |
| | WITH NO STUCCO, SEE 1403.1.6.FOR |
| | VENEERS |
| | 10C) PLANS ALSO ARE TO INDICATE THAT THE |
| | FOUNDATION IS A MINIMUM OF 12" BELOW |
| | GRADE, SEE 1804.1.3. SEEE GEOTECH REPORT |
| | FOR MINIMUM HEIGHT OF FOUNDATION. |
| | |
| | 11)BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY |
| | BE ISSUED, IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO |
| | PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL PERMIT |
| | SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT |
| | OFFICE, AND A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT |
| | ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT APPLICATION. |
| | PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE |
| | INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | JIM WITMER |
| | TEL: (561)805-6715 |
| | FAX: (561)659-8026 |
