| Date |
Text |
| 2005-02-04 00:00:00 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | 1.)THE PLANS FOR THE STRUCTURE APPEAR |
| | TO CONFLICT WITH THE EXISTING BUILDING. |
| | TYPE VI IS DECLARED (DWG |
| | #XP-N-00-02-FL).THE ADDITION IS TO BE |
| | OF THE SAME BUILDING TYPE AS THE |
| | EXISTING. |
| | |
| | 2.)IS THIS BUILDING SPRINKLED?NOTE |
| | ON THE PLAN.SPRINKLERS REQUIRED AT |
| | NEW |
| | AREAS FOR ADDITIONS TO SPRINKLED |
| | BUILDINGS.PLEASE NOTE EXISTING |
| | BUILDING CONDITION ON THE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 5.)THE PLAN FOR THE ROOFTOP STRUCTURE |
| | ALSO DECLARE A BUSINESS OCCUPANCY, THEN |
| | STATES THAT IT "SHALL NOT BE LOCATED |
| | WHERE ACCESSIBILITY IS REQUIRED". |
| | BUSINESS OCCUPANCY REQUIRES |
| | ACCESSIBILITY.THE PLAN PREPARED BY |
| | MORRISON HERSCHFIELD INDICATE THAT THIS |
| | IS UNINHABITABLE.IF THIS STRUCTURE |
| | HAS |
| | A BUSINESS OCCUPANCY AS DECLARED, SHOW |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH FBC CHAPTER 11. |
| | |
| | 6.)SHOW OCCUPANCY SEPARATION |
| | COMPLIANCE (BETWEEN THE EXISTING |
| | STRUCTURE AND NEW), FBC CHAPTER 7. |
| | |
| | 6.)THE PLAN FOR THE ROOFTOP STRUCTURE |
| | DECLARES HVHZ; CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | IS NOT IN THE HVHZ. |
| | |
| | 7.)A TITLE BLOCK IS REQUIRED FOR THE |
| | ENGINEER (PLANS FOR ROOFTOP STRUCTURE). |
| | IF PRECISION QUINCY CORP IS THE TITLE |
| | BLOCK FOR THE ENGINEER, A CERTIFICATE |
| | OF AUTHORIZATION NUMBER IS TO BE ON THE |
| | PLAN.THE PRINTED NAME AND LICENSE |
| | NUMBER OF THE PERSON SEALING THE |
| | DOCUMENT IS TO BE ON THE PLAN. |
| | FAC61G15-23.002. |
| | |
| | 8.)THE TWO SETS OF PLANS PREPARED BY |
| | MORRISON HERSCHFIELD ARE NOT THE SAME. |
| | ONE IS DATED 8/27, REVISION 2.THE |
| | OTHER HAS AN UNDATED SEAL, REVISION 4. |
| | PLEASE DATE FAC61G1-15, AND SUBMIT TWO |
| | IDENTICAL SETS. |
| | |
| | 9.)A-S3, PROVIDE THE PRESCRIPTIVE |
| | STRENGTH FOR THE GUARDRAIL COMPLIANT |
| | WITH FBC1608.2.2(1) THROUGH (4). |
| | |
| | 10.) I AM STILL UNABLE TO FIND THE ROOF |
| | DESIGN PRESSURE ON THE PLAN.SEE THE |
| | PREVIOUS LISTS, SPECIFICALLY ITEM #2 ON |
| | PREVIOUS LIST.DPS CANNOT BE SPECIFIED |
| | BY THE ROOFER. |
| | |
| | 11.)SEE THE PREVIOUS LIST, ITEM #7. |
| | PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE EXISTING |
| | ROOF STRUCTURE AND ITS ABILITY TO |
| | ACCOMODATE THE NEW EQUIPMENT.THE |
| | CALCULATIONS REFER TO COLUMN CHECK, |
| | SHEAR WALL CHECK, FOUNDATION CHECK. |
| | WHAT ABOUT THE ROOF DECK? |
| | |
| | 12.)PROVIDE A DATE FOR THE SEAL FOR |
| | THE CALCS AND THE CERTIFICATE OF |
| | AUTHORIZATION NUMBER ON THE CALCS. |
| | SECOND TIME FOR THIS COMMENT; PLEASE |
| | COMPLY.THIS IS A REQUIREMENT FOR ALL |
| | DOCUMENTS. |
| | |
| | 13.)FS553.80(2)(B), 4X FEE WILL BE |
| | CHARGED, SEE ATTACHED. |
