| Date |
Text |
| 2004-12-14 00:00:00 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | 1.)THE FIRST CORRECTION LIST |
| | REQUESTED |
| | THAT THE PLANS BE STAMPED FOR IMPACT |
| | FEES AND THE RECEIPT PROVIDED.IN THE |
| | SECOND REVIEW, THE IMPACT FEE STAMP WAS |
| | PROVIDED BUT THE RECEIPT WAS NOT.NOW |
| | THE RECEIPT WAS PROVIDED BUT THE |
| | STAMPED |
| | PLAN IS NOT IN THE PACKAGE.WHEN |
| | RESUBMITTING, PROVIDE BOTH IMPACT FEE |
| | STAMP AND RECEIPT. |
| | |
| | 2.)IN REGARDS TO THE SKYLIGHT, |
| | AMERICAN SKYLIGHT DOES NOT AT THIS TIME |
| | HAVE A THIRD PARTY QUALITY ASSURANCE |
| | ENTITY (FAC9B-72) AT THE TIME OF MY |
| | CONVERSATION WITH THEM. IF RESUBMITTED |
| | WITHOUT LOCAL OR STATE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL, |
| | A SEPARATE PERMIT FOR THAT ITEM WILL BE |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 3.)SEE PREVIOUS LIST, PLEASE CLARIFY |
| | AS TO HOW THE ROOF DESIGN PRESSURE |
| | SHOWN |
| | ON S1 WAS DETERMINED (SHOWS -33).THE |
| | RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT |
| | CALCULATIONS |
| | ARE ATTACHED; NONE WERE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 4.)SEE PREVIOUS LIST, INCLUDE A |
| | DETAIL |
| | FOR UL U309 (A1).THIS SHOULD BE |
| | INCORPORATED INTO THE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 5.)SEE ATTACHED NOTICE, |
| | FS553.80(2)(B), 3X FEE REQUIRED TO |
| | IMPOSED AFTER THIRD REJECTION. |
