Date |
Text |
2004-11-01 00:00:00 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| PERMIT: 04051040 |
| ADD: 2485 METROCENTRE BLVD |
| CONT: PARAG CONSTRUCTION |
| TEL: (754)264-6192 |
| FL BLD CODE= 2001 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE |
| * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS |
| 3RDREVIEW |
| ACTION: DENIED |
| |
| |
| 1) PROVIDE NOC RECORDED WITH THE CLERK |
| OF COURT BEFORE A PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. |
| THE NOC BY FL STATE LAW NEEDS TO BE |
| RE-RECORDED, NO WORK HAS STARTED AFTER |
| 90 DAYS OF RECORDING. |
| |
| 2) SOILS REPORTS: |
| A) (3) ORIGINAL SIGNED & SEALD SOILS |
| REPORTS ARE REQUIRED. |
| B) (3) ORIGINAL DENSITY REPORTS BY |
| NUTTING. |
| PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS,REPORTS OR |
| OTHER DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY THE DESIGN |
| PROFESSIONAL AND BEING FILED FOR PUBLIC |
| RECORD SHALL HAVE THE SIGNATURE AND |
| SEAL OF THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AFFIXED |
| TO THE DOCUMENT. |
| FL STATE STAT: 61G15-23.002 ENGINEERS |
| FL ATATE STAT: 61G16.003 ARCHITECTS |
| |
| 3) PROVIDE ENERGY CALS, (3) REQUEST, |
| FL BLD CODE CHAP 13 ENERGY EFFICENCY |
| PROVIDE ENERGY CALS/ W MANUAL "J" |
| |
| 4)FL BLD CODE 104.2.1.2 |
| ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED, |
| COMMENT# 7 FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW, |
| THE DO NOT MATCH, THE FLOOR PLAN VS THE |
| ELEVATION, ON THE ELEVATION (NORTH) OF |
| SHEET A-1 (2) WINDOWS ARE MISSING ON |
| EACH FLOOR. SEE ROOMS 100,102,104,106 & |
| 108. MISSING WINDOWS IN ROOMS 100 & |
| 108. |
| |
| 5)PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH |
| PERMIT APPLICATION AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003 |
| ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA |
| PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR INFORMATION |
| PLEASE SEE THE STATE WEBSITE AT |
| WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. PRODUCTS WITH |
| STATEWIDE APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE |
| SUBMITTED WITH A COVER SHEET THAT LISTS |
| THE PRODUCT IDENTITY NUMBER FROM THE |
| STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT HAVE |
| STATEWIDE APPROVAL, SUBMIT AN APPLICA- |
| TION FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OR SITE |
| SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE 9B-72. SEE |
| ATTACHMENT. WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG |
| FL BLD CODE 1606.1.5: COMPONENTS & |
| CLADDING, PROVIDE 2 COPIES(3 IF THRESH- |
| OLD OR RESIDENT INSPECTOR) OF PRODUCT |
| TESTING REPORTS,MISSING REPORTS ARE AS |
| FOLLOWS: |
| A) EXTERIOR STEEL DOORS |
| B) EXTEIOR GLAZED DOORS |
| C) EXTERIOR AUTO FRONT ENTRY DOORS |
| D) EFIS SYSTEMS |
| E) WALL LOUVER |
| F) STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS |
| 1) WOOD CONNECTORS/ TRUSS CONNECTORS |
| 2) EXTERIOR RAILINGS |
| G) ROOF ASEMBLIES, FLAT, UNDERLAYMENT, |
| ROOF TILES |
| |
| 6)THE STRUCTURAL AND ARCHITECTURAL |
| PLANS |
| DO NOT PROVIDE SUFFICENT INFORMATION ON |
| THE PORT COCHERE CEILING.NOTE (11) FROM |
| THE PREVIOUS REVIEW. |
| A) PROVIDE THE ATTACHMENT INFORMATION |
| BE |
| TWEEN THE METAL HIGH-HAT AND BAR JOIST. |
| B) PROVIDE MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATION |
| (APPROVAL) FOR EXTERIOR CEILINGS OR |
| SOFFITS. |
| C) SHEET A-5 PORT COCHERE DETAIL |
| DOESN'T |
| INDICATE THE FINISH MATERIAL TO BE USED |
| |
| OVER THE GYPSUM SHEATHING, PLEASE GIVE |
| FINISH. NOTE UNDER LIMITATIONS FOR |
| EXTER |
| IOR GYPSUM SHEATHING IS NOT A SUITABLE |
| SUBTRATE FOR THE DIRECT APLICATION OF |
| STUCCO, PAINT OR TEXTURES. |
| |
| 7) NOTE# 16 FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW, |
| STORAGE ROOM NEXT TO THE STAIRWELL AT |
| EACH END OF THE BUILDING DO NOT PROVIDE |
| |
| FIRE RATED DOORS, SEEA-6 DOOR SCHEDULE |
| DOOR# 15. TABLE 704.1 OCCUPANCY SEPERA- |
| TION S2 LOW HAZARD 2HR. |
| |
| 7B) NOTE# 16 FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW: |
| PROVIDE THE EQUIVALANT THICKNESS FOR THE |
| BLOCK WALL SEPERATING THE STORAGE ROOMS |
| AND SUITES. EQUIVALANT THICKNESS IS TO |
| BE PROVIDED BY THE BLOCK MANUFACTURER |
| FOR A 2 HR WALL, SEE 709.3.1. |
| |
| 8) NOTE# 20 FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW: |
| A) SHEET S-5 DETAIL "A" CORRECT SIZE OF |
| |
| BOLTS TO BE USED IN FOOTER 4-34/DIA. |
| B) COLUMN SPLICE WHAT TYPE OF METALS |
| ARE |
| TO BE USED FOR THE "SPLICE" WHAT TYPE OF |
| |
| WELD & THICKNESS. |
| C) STEEL COLUMN INDICATES THE USE OF A |
| 4"X4", BUT NO THICKNESS IS PROVIDED? |
| D) SAME DETAIL CAP PLATES INDICATE SEE |
| COLUMN SCHEDULEFOR THE SIZE BUT WHERE? |
| PROVIDE THE SIZE, THICKNESS AND THE |
| WELD |
| AND THE AMOUNT OF WEIGHT TO BE |
| RESISTED. |
| ARE GUSSET PLATES REQUIRED FOR UNDER THE |
| |
| CAP PLATES? |
| |
| 9) MISSING THE ROOF FRAMING IN REGAURDS |
| |
| TO THE CONCRETE ROOF DECK. |
| |
| 10) BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY BE |
| ISSUED, IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM |
| BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL PERMIT |
| SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT |
| OFFICE, AND A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT |
| ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT APPLICATION. |
| PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE |
| INFORMATION. |
| |
| WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE |
| THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY |
| PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER |
| LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUM- |
| BER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION |
| MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICA |
| TION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND |
| WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK |
| YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| |
| BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| JIM WITMER |
| TEL: (561)805-6715 |
| FAX: (561)659-8026 |