| Date |
Text |
| 2004-05-12 00:00:00 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | 1.)FLORIDA STATE, LOCAL OR SITE |
| | SPECIFIC PRODUCT APPROVALS REQUIRED |
| | RULE 9B-72.SEE WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG |
| | (PRODUCT APPROVAL) FOR MORE INFORMATION. |
| | ALSO SEE ATTACHED RULE. |
| | |
| | 2.)FOR THE PRODUCTS WITH A DADE COUNTY |
| | NOA, PRINT THE FLORIDA STATE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL FROM THE WEBSITE, IF |
| | AVAILABLE. |
| | |
| | 3.)FOR THE PRODUCTS WITH A DADE COUNTY |
| | NOA AND NOT LISTED ON THE STATE |
| | WEBSITE AS HAVING A STATE PRODUCT APP., |
| | PLEASE COMPLETE AN APPLICATION FOR |
| | LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL, ATTACHED. |
| | COMPLETE ONE FOR EACH PRODUCT.SUBMIT |
| | TWO COPIES. |
| | |
| | 4.)FOR THE PRODUCTS WITHOUT AN NOA, |
| | COMPLETE THE APPLICATION FOR LOCAL |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL.SEE THE ATTACHED |
| | VALIDATION CHECKLIST FOR LOCAL PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL TO ASSIST YOU IN PROPERLY |
| | FILLING OUT THE FORM TO AVOID DELAYS. |
| | |
| | 5.)THE ONE-TIME PRODUCT APPROVALS FROM |
| | MIAMI-DADE WILL BE FOR REFERENCE ONLY, |
| | NOT FOR APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 6.)AS THE ANCHORING IS NOT THE SAME |
| | AS WAS TESTED, THE ANCHORING OF THE |
| | PRODUCT IS TO BE INSPECTED AND CERTIFIED |
| | AND AN INSPECTION LETTER INDICATING |
| | COMPLIANCE IS TO BE SUBMITTED FROM A |
| | STRUCTURAL ENGINEER.THIS APPLIES ONLY |
| | TO PRODUCTS NOT INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE |
| | WITH THE NOA OR TEST REPORT.SUBMIT |
| | A SEALED LETTER INDICATING AGREEMENT. |
| | |
| | 7.)AS YOU DO NOT HAVE AN APPROVED |
| | THIRD PARTY QUALITY ASSURANCE ENTITY, |
| | ADDRESS HOW QUALITY ASSURANCE FOR THE |
| | MANUFACTURING WILL BE ADDRESSED AS PER |
| | RULE 9B-72. |
| | |
| | 8.)A GENERAL COMMENT REGARDING ALL |
| | OF THE GAMMA USA TEST REPORTS:THE |
| | REPORT IS VALID ONLY FOR THE SIZE |
| | TESTED.EXTRAPOLATION IS NOT INDICATED |
| | IS AN OPTION ON THE TEST REPORT. THE |
| | REPORT IS VALID ONLY FOR THE EXACT |
| | PRODUCT TESTED.TWO PRODUCTS MAY BE |
| | JOINED WITH A MULLION PROVIDED THAT A |
| | MULLION PRODUCT APPROVAL IS SUBMITTED |
| | AS WELL. |
| | |
| | 9.)DOOR TYPES SF9 AND SF10, SHEET 3.01 |
| | ARE NOT MARKED. |
| | |
| | 10.) DOORS SF9, SF10, SF11 REFER TO TEST |
| | #61 FOR THE WINDOW WALLS.TEST #61 IS |
| | FOR A WINDOW WALL SYSTEM WITH LOUVERS, |
| | RECTANGULAR WINDOWS.THE ELEVATIONS |
| | ARE FOR ARCHED WINDOWS, NO LOUVERS. |
| | IS THIS THE CORRECT REPORT OR ARE THE |
| | ELEVATIONS INCORRECT?SEE SHEET 3.01. |
| | THIS COMMENT APPLIES ALSO TO THE WINDOWS |
| | SHOWN ON SHEET 3.00. |
| | |
| | 11.) SF9, SF10, SF11 REFER TO TEST #69 |
| | FOR OPERABLE WINDOWS.THE TEST REPORT |
| | IS MISSING, ONLY UNSEALED DRAWINGS ARE |
| | IN THE BINDER. |
| | |
| | 12.)SHEET .02 DOES NOT INDICATE THE |
| | WINDOW OR DOOR TYPES FOR THE OPENINGS. |
| | |
| | 13.)THE WIND TUNNEL TESTING ELEVATIONS |
| | SHOW ONE NUMBER FOR PRESSURES, IMPLYING |
| | THE SAME NUMBER FOR BOTH POSITIVE AND |
| | NEGATIVE PRESSURE.HOW HAVE YOU ARRIVED |
| | AT A REDUCED POSITIVE PRESSURE IN SOME |
| | OF THE AREAS? |
| | |
| | 14.)TEST 50.4 WINDOW WALL IS |
| | INCOMPLETE; SHOULD BE A TOTAL OF 5 |
| | PAGES.THIS REPORT IS VALID ONLY FOR |
| | RECTANGULAR WINDOWS IN THE SIZE TESTED. |
| | |
| | 15.)SHEET 6.01, TYPE D3W, THE SIZE |
| | CONFLICTS WITH THE TEST REPORT |
| | REFERENCED.ALSO, THE TEST REPORT IS |
| | FORA WINDOW WALL SYSTEM WITH A 175 |
| | DEGREE MULLION.THE UNIT ON THE PLAN |
| | SHOWS A SGD, 135 DEGREE MULLION AND |
| | A FIXED GLASS PANEL. |
| | |
| | 16.)SOME SPEC SHEETS ARE IN FRENCH. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE ALL PRODUCT INFORMATION |
| | IN ENGLISH. |
| | |
| | 17.)SHEET 6.00, W5 REFERS TO TEST |
| | #50.2 WHICH IS FOR A WALL SYSTEM WITH |
| | A 175 DEGREE MULLION.CONFLICTS WITH |
| | WINDOW DETAIL SHOWN.ALSO CONFLICTS IN |
| | SIZE. |
| | |
| | 18.)SHEET 6.01, D1-1W REFERS TO TEST |
| | 50.4, WHICH IS A WALL SYSTEM WITH A |
| | 175 DEGREE MULLION, CONFLICTS WITH |
| | WINDOW DETAIL. |
| | |
| | 19.)TEST 55.2 HAS AN INCOMPLETE |
| | PRODUCT DESCRIPTION, ENDS WITH "171 |
| | DEGREE".THE PRODUCT DESCRIPTION DOES |
| | NOT MATCH THE WINDOW SHOWN ON 6.00, |
| | TYPE W6-1. |
| | |
| | 20.)BEHIND TEST 55.2 ARE MANY SPEC |
| | SHEETS INCLUDING VINYL WINDOWS, CASEMENT |
| | WINDOW OPERATORS, SKYLIGHT OPERATORS. |
| | PLEASE REMOVE ANY SHEETS NOT PERTINENT |
| | TO THIS SPECIFIC JOB. |
| | |
| | 21.)SHEET 7.00, THE WINDOW SIZES |
| | SHOWN CONFLICTS WITH THE TEST REPORT 65. |
| | |
| | 22.)THE ONE-TIME DADE COUNTY NOA |
| | SUBMITTED WITH THE TEST 50.4 IS FOR |
| | TEST 50.2. |
| | |
| | 23.)SHEET 8 REFERS TO TEST 50.4 FOR |
| | FIXED WINDOW WALLS.THE DETAILS |
| | CONFLICT WITH THE TEST REPORT. |
| | |
| | 24.)THE TEST REPORTS REVIEWED FOR |
| | YOUR PROJECT WERE BROUGHT IN AS A |
| | SUBMITTAL FROM SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION. |
| | THE BINDERS HAVE BEEN RETURNED TO |
| | SUFFOLK.PLEASE SUBMIT TEST REPORTS |
| | TO BE A PART OF THIS PERMIT APPLICATION. |
