| Date |
Text |
| 2006-06-01 00:00:00 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | *******DENIED******* |
| | ROBERT BROWN(561) 805 6652 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | REVISION SUBMITTED ON 4/14/06, AND |
| | RESUBMITTED ON 5/25/06, FOR MODIFIED |
| | BITUMEN ROOF SYSTEM PRODUCT APPROVAL AND |
| | PLANS FOR APPLICATION OF ROOFING SYSTEM |
| | TO THE METAL DECK OMITTING THE CONCRETE |
| | SLAB. |
| | |
| | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001 |
| | FBC*= FLORIDA BUILD'G CODE (CITY AMEND) |
| | F.S.= FLORIDA (STATE) STATUTE |
| | |
| | FOR CONSISTENCY, THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS |
| | ARE NUMBERED AS PER THE BUILDING PLAN |
| | REVIEW OF 5/12/06: |
| | |
| | 1) THE REVISED SHEETS A1.4.1, A3.2 AND |
| | A3.2.1 ARE READY FOR PROCESSING BUT THE |
| | THREE COPIES OF REVISED SHEET A3.1 WERE |
| | NOT RESUBMITTED ON 5/25/06.IT WAS |
| | ALREADY REVISED AND READY FOR PROCESSING |
| | BUT WAS NOT RESUBMITTED.SUBMIT THREE |
| | SIGNED AND SEALED COPIES OF THE ALREADY |
| | REVISED SHEET A3.1 |
| | |
| | 3) RATIONAL ANALYSIS REQUIRED PER |
| | MODIFIED BITUMEN ROOF PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | THIS COMMENT WAS NOT ADDRESSED.THREE |
| | COPIES OF THE TEXT FROM RAS 117 WERE |
| | SUBMITTED.THAT IS THE DOCUMENT THAT |
| | DESCRIBES HOW TO DO THE CALCULATIONS, SO |
| | SUBMITTING COPIES OF THE DOCUMENT TEXT |
| | DOES NOT ADDRESS THE NEED FOR |
| | CALCULATIONS (RATIONAL ANALYSIS) |
| | SPECIFIC TO THE USE OF THIS PRODUCT ON |
| | THIS BUILDING.THE ORIGINAL COMMENT |
| | TEXT IS REPEATED VERBATIM BELOW, PLEASE |
| | ADDRESS THE COMMENT: |
| | |
| | THE SUBMITTED GAF MODIFIED BITUMEN |
| | ROOFING PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA# 03-0430.12 |
| | WAS MISSING SHEETS 1 TO 3 AND THE STATE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER SHEET FL# 617-R1. |
| | THESE HAVE BEEN PRINTED FOR YOU TO |
| | EXPEDITE THE PROCESS.ON SHEET 13 OF |
| | THE NOA, THE STATED MAXIMUM DESIGN |
| | PRESSURE IS -60 PSF, WHICH IS ADEQUATE |
| | TO RESIST THE -43 PSF CALCULATED |
| | PRESSURE, STATED ON STRUCTURAL PLAN |
| | SHEET S1.0, FOR ZONE 1 (FIELD) OF THE |
| | ROOF.AS STATED ON SHEET 13 OF THE NOA, |
| | THAT IS ACHIEVED USING A FASTENER |
| | DENSITY OF 1 FASTENER PER 1.5 SQUARE |
| | FEET FOR ATTACHMENT OF THE INSULATION TO |
| | THE METAL DECK.HOWEVER, FOR ZONES 2 |
| | AND 3, STRUCTURAL PLAN SHEET S1.0 STATES |
| | THAT THE CALCULATED PRESSURES ON THE |
| | BUILDING ARE -73 PSF AND -107 PSF |
| | RESPECTIVELY.ALTHOUGH THESE PRESSURES |
| | EXCEED THE ALLOWABLE -60 PSF MAXIMUM |
| | DESIGN PRESSURE STATED ON SHEET 13 OF |
| | THE NOA, THAT SHEET REFERS TO GENERAL |
| | LIMITATION #7.ON SHEET 31 OF THE NOA, |
| | GENERAL LIMITATION #7 ALLOWS RATIONAL |
| | ANALYSIS TO DETERMINE THE INCREASED |
| | FASTENER DENSITY REQUIRED TO RESIST THE |
| | -73 PSF AND -107 PSF WIND PRESSURES IN |
| | ZONES 2 AND 3.NO RATIONAL ANALYSIS WAS |
| | SUBMITTED.SUBMIT CALCULATIONS STATING |
| | THE FASTENER INSULATION LAYER FASTENER |
| | DENSITY. |
| | |
| | 3) ON 5/4/06 A HOLD (REFERENCE #19620) |
| | WAS PLACED ON THIS PARCEL BY MR EFRAIM |
| | GARCED FOR AN UNPAID ALARM FEE OF |
| | $275.00.NO FURTHER PROCESSING OF PLANS |
| | WILL BE CARRIED OUT UNTIL THAT FEE IS |
| | PAID AND THE HOLD REMOVED.PLEASE |
| | CONTACT MR EFRAIM GARCED (TEL: |
| | 561-822-1320) FOR MORE DETAILS AND |
| | INFORMATION ON HOW TO PAY AND HAVE THE |
| | HOLD REMOVED. |
| | |
| | **QUOTE PERMIT# ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE** |
| | |
| | END OF REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | THE CODE REFERENCES GIVE ADDITIONAL INFO |
| | TELEPHONE: (561) 805 6652ROBERT BROWN |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
