| Date |
Text |
| 2006-04-09 00:00:00 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | ******DENIED******** |
| | ROBERT BROWN(561) 805 6652 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | REVISION SUBMITTED 2/13/05 FOR ROLLING |
| | TECHNOLOGIES DOOR AND WINDOW DETAILS AND |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS. |
| | |
| | 1) ONLY TWO COPIES OF THE DOCUMENTS WERE |
| | SUBMITTED.THIS IS A THRESHOLD |
| | INSPECTOR PROJECT SO A THIRD COPY OF ALL |
| | DOCUMENTS IS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 2) SINGLE HUNG WINDOW, LARGE MISSILE |
| | IMPACT RATED.THE SUBMITTED MIAMI WALL |
| | SYSTEMS, INC SERIES 122 ALUMINUM SINGLE |
| | HUNG WINDOW LMI PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA# |
| | 04-1122.06 STATES A MAXIMUM UNIT FRAME |
| | HEIGHT OF 72".THIS MAXIMUM HEIGHT IS |
| | EXCEEDED IN THE COMPONENTS THAT MAKE UP |
| | WINDOWS REF. F1A LM, F1B LM, F1D LM, |
| | W1 LM, W3 LM AND SFC LM, ALL OF WHICH |
| | ARE SHOWN ON PLAN SHEET 32B OF 49 AS |
| | BEING BASED ON THIS PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | PROVIDE AN ALTERNATIVE PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | AND AMEND THE WINDOW/DOOR SCHEDULE ON |
| | PLAN SHEET 32B. |
| | |
| | 3) SINGLE HUNG WINDOW, SMALL MISSILE |
| | IMPACT RATED.THE SUBMITTED MIAMI WALL |
| | SYSTEMS, INC SERIES 122 ALUMINUM SINGLE |
| | HUNG WINDOW SMI PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA# |
| | 04-1122.07 STATES A MAXIMUM UNIT FRAME |
| | HEIGHT OF 72".THIS MAXIMUM HEIGHT IS |
| | EXCEEDED IN THE COMPONENTS THAT MAKE UP |
| | WINDOWS REF. W1 SM, W3 SM, W8A SM AND |
| | SFD SM, ALL OF WHICH ARE SHOWN ON PLAN |
| | SHEET 32B OF 49 AS BEING BASED ON THIS |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL.PROVIDE AN |
| | ALTERNATIVE PRODUCT APPROVAL AND AMEND |
| | THE WINDOW/DOOR SCHEDULE ON PLAN SHEET |
| | 32B. |
| | |
| | 4) SLIDING GLASS DOOR, LARGE MISSILE |
| | IMPACT RATED.THE SUBMITTED MIAMI WALL |
| | SYSTEMS, INC. SERIES 100 ALUMINUM |
| | SLIDING GLASS DOOR TEST REPORT FROM |
| | FENESTRATION TESTING LABORATORY, |
| | COVERING THE PROPOSED DOOR HEIGHTS, IS |
| | NOTED.SIGNED AND SEALED COPIES OF THIS |
| | REPORT ARE REQUIRED BECAUSE THE DOOR |
| | HEIGHTS PROPOSED FOR THIS PROJECT ARE |
| | OUTSIDE THE SCOPE OF PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | NOA# 01-0123.02 |
| | |
| | 5) SLIDING GLASS DOOR, SMALL MISSILE |
| | IMPACT RATED.THE SUBMITTAL OF |
| | COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS IN SUPPORT OF THE |
| | SUBMITTED MIAMI WALL SYSTEMS, INC. |
| | SERIES 100 ALUMINUM SLIDING GLASS DOOR |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA# 01-1108.03, IS |
| | NOTED.THE HEIGHTS OF THE PROPOSED |
| | SLIDING GLASS DOORS EXCEED THE 104-3/4" |
| | MAXIMUM STATED IN THE PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | WHILE COMPARATIVE/RATIONAL ANALYSIS CAN |
| | BE USED TO JUSTIFY RESISTANCE TO WIND |
| | PRESSURES, THE MISSILE IMPACT RATING OF |
| | THE DOORS CAN ONLY BE SHOWN BY TESTING. |
| | RATIONAL ANALYSIS CANNOT BE USED TO |
| | JUSTIFY THE USE OF THE DOORS OUTSIDE THE |
| | SCOPE OF THE PRODUCT APPROVAL WHEN |
| | MISSILE IMPACT RATING IS REQUIRED. |
| | SUBMIT A MISSILE IMPACT TEST REPORT OR |
| | SUBMIT AN ALTERNATIVE PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | |
| | 6) TO EXPEDITE REVIEW OF A RESUBMITTAL |
| | WHICH REQUIRES NEW PLANS IN ORDER TO |
| | ADDRESS THE ABOVE COMMENTS, THE OLD |
| | SHEETS SHALL BE REMOVED AND THE NEW |
| | SHEETS INSERTED.ONE COPY OF EACH OLD |
| | SHEET SHOULD BE STAPLED/CLIPPED TO THE |
| | REMAINING OLD SHEETS, TO FORM A SET OF |
| | 'OLD/VOID SHEETS', FOR COMPARISON OF |
| | REVISIONS WHEN REVIEWING THE RESUBMITTED |
| | PLANS. |
| | |
| | **QUOTE PERMIT# ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE** |
| | |
| | END OF REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | TELEPHONE: (561) 805 6652ROBERT BROWN |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
