| Date |
Text |
| 2004-02-25 00:00:00 | BUILDING REVIEW CHECKLIST: |
| | 1-PAY IMPACT FEES. BRING BACK STAMPED |
| | DRAWINGS AND PAID RECEIPT. |
| | 2-NORTH ARROW ORIENTATION SHOWN ON THE |
| | SITE PLAN IS INCORRECT. SEE SURVEY AND |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | 3-ENERGY CALCULATIONS: A)ORIENTATION OF |
| | BUILDING DOESN'T MATCH PLANS. SEE |
| | SURVEY AND REVISE CALCULATIONS. OR DO |
| | WORST CASE SCENARIO. |
| | B)REVISE UNDER ATTIC AREA. SEE SECTION |
| | 604.1.A.1 OF CHAPTER 13 FBC 2001. |
| | 4-PROVIDE COMPLETE BATHROOM WITH A DOOR |
| | THAT ALLOWS 29" MIN. CLEAR OPENING. |
| | SEC. 11-11 FBC 2001. |
| | 5-DESIGN CRITERIA: ADD THE 30PSF/10PSF |
| | ATTIC LIVE LOAD AS REQUIRED BY TABLE |
| | 1604.1 FBC 2001. |
| | 6-PROVIDE BBQ APPROVAL AND SPECS REQ'D |
| | BY SEC. 2808 FBC 2001. |
| | 7-SPECIFY SAFETY GLASS AS REQUIRED. SEE |
| | PLANS FOR COMMENTS. SEC. 2405.2 FBC/01 |
| | 8-PROVIDE 2 COPIES, SIGNED AND SEALED, |
| | OF SOIL TEST REPORT. ONLY 1 SUBMITTED. |
| | 9-PROVIDE COMPLETE FLORIDA OR LOCAL |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR(NOTE: PROVIDE |
| | ONLY PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR ITEMS TO BE |
| | INSTALLED IN THIS PROJECT TO EXPEDITE |
| | THE REVIEW PROCESS): |
| | A)SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS. NEED 2 COPIES. |
| | B)FRENCH DOORS WITH TRANSOM ABOVE SINGLE |
| | ASSEMBLY AS SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| | **CLARIFY IF USING IMPACT GLAZING. |
| | **PROVIDE LEGIBLE DRAWINGS. |
| | C)WINDOW MULLIONS. NEED MATCHING DWGS |
| | AND CLEARLY INDICATE MULLION SIZE AND |
| | COMPONENTS TO BE USED. |
| | D)CLARIFY IF SWINGING DOORS PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL SUBMITTED IS FOR ENTRY DOORS. |
| | IF SO, THEN, CLARIFY WHAT IS THE MEANS |
| | OF ESCAPE PROVIDED WHEN STORM SHUTTERS |
| | ARE INSTALLED. SEC. 1005.4.5 FBC 2001. |
| | **NEED LEGIBLE DRAWINGS. |
| | E)STORM SHUTTERS: **FLORIDA APPROVAL IS |
| | PENDING. **CLARIFY INSTALLATION SCHED. |
| | TO IDENTIFY WHAT'S IMPACT GLAZING OR |
| | NOT. **CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE MEANS OF |
| | ESCAPE. **WHICH PRODUCT APPROVAL IS |
| | GOING TO BE USED. THERE ARE 2. |
| | **DRAWINGS NEED TO HAVE ENGINEER'S |
| | ORIGINAL SEAL, SIGNATURE, DATE AS |
| | REQUIRED BY THE ENGINEER. **WIND LOAD |
| | SCHEDULE DWG NEEDS TO REVISE THE PEAK |
| | ROOF HEIGHT. SEE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS |
| | FOR CORRECT ONE. |
| | **CHECK ENGINEERED DRAWINGS FOR LIMITATI |
| | ONS ON MAXIMUM/MINIMUM PANEL SPAN. |
| | **NEED LEGIBLE DRAWINGS. |
| | |
| | F)CLARIFY WHERE IS THE "IMPACT WALL 3000 |
| | SYSTEM GOING TO BE USED. NEED FLORIDA |
| | OR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | **IF THIS SYSTEM IS TO BE USED ON FIXED |
| | WINDOWS AS SHOWN ON PLANS, THEN, NEED |
| | SEPARATE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR WINDOWS |
| | BIGGER THAN THOSE COVER IN THIS REPORT |
| | G)NEED FLORIDA/LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | FOR GARAGE DOORS. |
| | **NEED GARAGE DOORS THAT MEET THE DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES CALCULATED BY ARCHITECT. |
| | |
| | 10-SPECIFY ROOF TILE FASTENING. SEE SEC. |
| | 1606.3 FBC 2001 AND SEC. 104.2.1.1 |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2001. |
| | 11-OWES $613.72 FOR LOW DECLARED VALUE & |
| | RADON FEES. |
| | 12-SPECIFY HOW IS (3)2X12 AT ENTRY PORCH |
| | PUT TOGETHER TO FORM BEAM.SECTION |
| | 104.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2001. |
| | 13-SHEET A6.1: A)SPECIFY CONNECTOR FOR |
| | GIRDER TRUSS. SE PLAN FOR COMMENTS. |
| | B)PROVIDE COLUMN CAP THAT SUPPORTS TWO |
| | GIRDER TRUSSES AS SHOWN ON PLAN. SEE |
| | COMMENTS ON ROOF FRAMING PLAN. |
| | 14-REVISE WINDOW BUCK DETAIL: A) SEE |
| | SEC. 1707.4.4.2 FBC 2001 FOR PROPER |
| | BUCK INSTALLATION. |
| | B)PROVIDE DETAIL THAT CORRECTLY SHOWS |
| | RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BUCK AND WALL. |
| | EG: SEE DOOR DETAIL. DRAWING SHOWS |
| | BUCK INSTALLED ON A PLAIN WALL WITH |
| | NO EDGES. SEE COMMENTS ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL |
| | JULIO GOMEZ AT 805-6712. |
