| Date |
Text |
| 2005-03-03 00:00:00 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| | 1.)THE TRUSS PACKAGE SUBMITTED DOES |
| | NOT APPEAR TO BE CODE COMPLIANT.BCLL |
| | OF 10 IS REQUIRED, FBC TABLE 1604.1. |
| | THIS CANNOT BE A NONCONCURRENT LOAD AS |
| | INDICATED IN NOTE 4.ALSO NOTE 4 REFERS |
| | TO UBC94; THIS CODE IS NOT USED IN |
| | FLORIDA.GOVERNING CODE IS FBC2001. |
| | |
| | 2.)THE CODE USED FOR THE ENGINEERING |
| | WAS FBC2001/ANSI95.YOU CANNOT USE |
| | ANSI95 AS THIS TAKES THE STRESS INCREASE |
| | FOR STEEL, 33%.AS PER MY CONVERSATION |
| | WITH MITEK, THE CORRECT STANDARD IS |
| | TPI2002. |
| | |
| | 3.)THE SIGNATURE IS A PHOTOCOPY, NOT |
| | ALLOWED AS PER FAC61G15-23.002L.A |
| | TITLE BLOCK IS REQUIRED FOR EACH SHEET. |
| | REVISE THE TRUSS ENGINEERING AND SUBMIT |
| | FOR REVIEW. |
| | |
| | 4.)THE TRUSS DRAWINGS ARE TO BE |
| | REVIEWED BY ENGINEER OF RECORD, |
| | FAC61G15-31.002(2). |
| | |
| | 5.)REGARDING THE APPLICATION FOR LOCAL |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL, I WAS UNABLE TO FIND |
| | STEPHEN D. FISHER, PE/MARVIN LUMBER AND |
| | CEDAR ON THE WEBSITE AS AN APPROVED |
| | THIRD PARTY QUALITY ASSURANCE ENTITY, |
| | FAC9B72. |
| | |
| | 6.)THE APPLICATION FOR LOCAL PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL STATES THAT IT IS FOR THE |
| | DOUBLE HUNG WINDOWS BUT THE DOCUMENTS |
| | SUBMITTED ARE FOR MULLIONS ONLY, SEE THE |
| | EVALUATION REPORT, LIMITATIONS AND |
| | CONDITIONS OF USE, ITEM 1.TEST REPORTS |
| | AND SEPARATE APPLICATION REQUIRED FOR |
| | THE WINDOWS, FBC1704.2.1. |
| | |
| | 7.)ALL DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN |
| | ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED FOR PUBLIC RECORD |
| | ARE TO BE ORIGINAL, SIGNED AND SEALED, |
| | FAC61G15-23.002. |
| | |
| | 8.)9B-72 DEFINITIONS, TEST REPORT IS |
| | TO BE BY AN APPROVED TESTING LABORATORY, |
| | 9B72.010(31).THE EVALUATION REPORT |
| | REFERS TO AN INHOUSE TEST REPORT AND AN |
| | ANALYSIS AND EXCEL FILE.PROVIDE |
| | DOCUMENTATION USED FOR THE EVALUATION AS |
| | PER FAC9B72(5)(D). |
