| Date |
Text |
| 2004-06-14 00:00:00 | ENTRY DOOR PRODUCT APPROVAL CHECKLIST: |
| | 1-AS PER MEETING WITH ASSISTANT BUILDING |
| | OFFICIAL, BILL STAPLES, SITE SPECIFIC |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL WITHOUT TESTING |
| | REQUIRES SIGNED AND SEALED LETTER FROM |
| | ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER CERTIFYING THAT |
| | DOOR WAS BUILT AS PER SPECS & ANOTHER |
| | LETTER CERTIFYING THAT DOOR WAS |
| | INSTALLED AS PER SPECS. |
| | 2-DRAWINGS SUBMITTED: |
| | A)DWGSSUBMITTED NEED TO HAVE ALL |
| | ARCHITECTS INFORMATION AND ORIGINAL |
| | SEAL AND SIGNATURE AS REQ'D BY CHAPTER |
| | 481 FLORIDA STATUTES WHEN SUBMITTING |
| | INFO. FOR PUBLIC RECORDS (PROVIDE 2 |
| | COMPLETE COPIES) |
| | B)DRAWINGS NEED TO REFERENCE THE DESIGN |
| | CRITERIA USED. |
| | FULLY REVIEW SEC. 1707.4 FBC 2001 TO |
| | PROPERLY MAKE REFERENCE OF DESIGN |
| | CRITERIA REQUIRED FOR THIS DESIGN. |
| | **ALSO, SEE SEC. 1606.1.7 FBC 2001 FOR |
| | MINIMUM REQUIRED INFORMATION. |
| | C)PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION SHOWING |
| | HOW THE GLASS IN THE DOOR IS GOING TO |
| | BE PROTECTED FROM IMPACT AS REQ'D BY |
| | SEC. 1606.1.4 FBC 2001. |
| | 3-PROVIDE COMPLETE DESIGN PACKAGE |
| | WITH ALL CALCULATIONS, DETAILS, SPECS, |
| | ETC. AS REQ'D ON RULE CHAPTER 9B-72, |
| | CHAPTER 16 AND 17 FBC 2001. SECTION |
| | 104.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2001. |
| | **INFORMATION SUBMITTED IS COMING FROM 2 |
| | DIFFERENT SOURCES INSTEAD OF BEING A |
| | COMPLETE SINGLE DESIGN PACKAGE. |
| | 4-ARCHITECT'S DESIGNPACKAGE: |
| | A)TABLE 1610.1 DOESN'T APPLY FOR THE |
| | DESIGN OF DOORS. SEE SEC 1606 & 1707.4 |
| | FBC 2001 FOR CORRECT APPLICATION. |
| | B)ARE HINGES & LOCKING HARDWARE DESIGNED |
| | FOR EXTERIOR DOORS FOR WIND LOADS?. |
| | SHOW DESIGN CRITERIA. SEC. 104.2.1.2 |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2001. |
| | |
| | |
| | **REMAINDER: |
| | PROVIDE ALL INFORMATION REQUESTED ON |
| | PROVISO DATED 4-14-04 PRIOR TO INSTA- |
| | LLATION TO AVOID ANY CONFLICT/DELAYS. |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL |
| | JULIO GOMEZ AT 805-6712. |
