| Date |
Text |
| 2004-03-12 00:00:00 | DENIED |
| | |
| | 1) A RECORDED COPY OF THE NOTICE OF |
| | COMMENCEMENT MUST BE SUBMITTED BEFORE A |
| | PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. |
| | |
| | 3) SUBMIT STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE |
| | SINGLE OUTSWING EXTERIOR DOOR AT BATH #2 |
| | |
| | 4) THE STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE |
| | COLLIER GARAGE DOOR IS LISTED AS VALID- |
| | ATED. THIS MEANS IT HAS NOT BEEN |
| | APPROVED. SUBMIT APPROPRIATE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 5) SUBMIT STATE OR LOCAL PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL FOR 8'X 7' GARAGE DOOR. THE |
| | INFO FOR THE COLLIER GARAGE DOOR THAT |
| | WAS SUBMITTED IS LIMITED TO A MINIMUM |
| | SIZE OF 10'X6'. |
| | |
| | 6) THE TRUSS ANCHOR SCHEDULE ON SHEET 9 |
| | LISTS A NU-VUE NVSTA 48 CONNECTOR. THE |
| | STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED LISTS A |
| | NVRT 48 OR A NVSTA 22. PLEASE CLARIFY. |
| | |
| | 7) THE TRUSS ANCHOR SCHEDULE LISTS A |
| | SIMPSON HUC 412 CONNECTOR WITH 1505# OF |
| | UPLIFT. THE STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | SUBMITTED IS FOR A HU 412 WITH 905# OF |
| | UPLIFT. PLEASE CLARIFY. |
| | |
| | 8) THE HTA 16 CONNECTOR IS LISTED IN THE |
| | ANCHOR SCHEDULE AS A SIMPSON CONNECTOR |
| | AND IT SHOULD BE USP. PLEASE CORRECT. |
| | |
| | 9) THE TRUSS TIE DOWN LAYOUT ON SHEET 9 |
| | IS CONFUSING WITH UPPER AND LOWER ROOF |
| | AND FLOOR TRUSS CONNECTORS ALL SPECIFIED |
| | ON ONE DRAWING. PLEASE SEPARATE INTO |
| | LOWER ROOF, UPPER ROOF AND FLOOR TRUSS |
| | LAYOUT PLANS FOR CLARITY. |
| | |
| | 10) CLARIFY THE TWO #7 ANCHORS THAT ARE |
| | SPECIFIED NEAR THE CENTER OF THE GIRDER |
| | TRUSS AT THE LOWER ROOF ON THE LEFT SIDE |
| | OF THE LAYOUT. |
| | |
| | 11) THERE ARE INCONSISTANCES IN THE SIZE |
| | OF THE BUTT GLASS WINDOWS THROUGHOUT THE |
| | PLANS AND SITE SPECIFIC PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | REAR ELEVATION HAS 40"X72", PLAN DETAIL |
| | HAS 44"X66" + 42-5/8"X66" AND THE SITE |
| | SPECIFIC PRODUCT APPROVAL HAS 44"X69" + |
| | 39"X69". PLEASE CORRECT. |
| | |
| | 12) THE LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED |
| | FOR THE BUTT GLASS WINDOW IS INCOMPLETE. |
| | SEE RULE 9B-72. INDICATE METHOD 1 OR |
| | METHOD 2. INDICATE THE CATEGORY OF |
| | PRODUCT. THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE THE |
| | COMPANY ASSEMBLING THE PRODUCT. LIST AN |
| | APPROVED THIRD PARTY QUALITY ASSURANCE |
| | ENTITY. LIST ALL THE INFORMATION THAT IS |
| | REQUIRED FOR AN EVALUATION REPORT FROM A |
| | FLORIDA PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER AS LISTED |
| | FOR ITEM #5 IN 9B-72.040. SEE ATTACHMENT |
| | SPECIFY ANY LIMITATIONS (SUCH AS IMPACT |
| | PROTECTION REQUIRED). LIST THE |
| | REQUIREMENTS THE PRODUCT COMPLIES WITH |
| | INCLUDING CODE SECTION NUMBERS AND |
| | REFERENCE STANDARDS, SUCH AS FBC 1606, |
| | 1707, 2406.2 AND TAS 202. SUBMIT TEST |
| | REPORTS, TECHNICAL DOCUMENTS, |
| | CALCULATIONS, ETC. WHICH IS THE BASIS |
| | FOR THE RATIONAL ANALYSIS. PROVIDE A |
| | DETAILED REPORT INDICATING HOW THE |
| | CONCLUSIONS WERE REACHED. BUTT GLAZING |
| | ON ARCHITECTURAL PLANS IS AT 90 DEGREE |
| | ANGLE. SPECIFY WHAT ANGLE OR ANGLES ARE |
| | ALLOWED BY PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 13) SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVALS, KEY PLAN |
| | AND INSTALLATION SCHEDULE FOR STORM |
| | PANELS. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL: |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL |
| | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW |
| | (561)805-6714 |
