| Date |
Text |
| 2004-01-27 00:00:00 | BUILDING REVIEW APPROVED WITH PROVISO: |
| | 1-PROVIDE COMPLETE FLORIDA/SITE SPECIFIC |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR ALL DOOR & WINDOW |
| | TYPES, GLASS BLOCK, ROOF TILE AND |
| | STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS. |
| | 2-DETAIL E/4 AND RESIDENTIAL NOTES ON |
| | DRAWING #2 DON'T MATCH. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | 3-CLARIFY/REVISE TRUSS ANCHOR SCHEDULE. |
| | CHECK FOR TYPOS FOR CLARIFICATION OF |
| | ANCHOR SPECS. SEC. 104.2.1.2 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2001. |
| | 4-TYPICAL WALL SECTION DETAIL A/4. WHERE |
| | ARE TABLES 6 AND 8 SHOWN FOR ROOF TILE |
| | FASTENERS TAKEN FROM?. SEE SECTION |
| | 1606.3.2 FBC 2001. |
| | 5-SHEET #7: A)WINDOWS SHOWN ON REAR |
| | ELEVATION DON'T MATCH THOSE SPECIFIED |
| | ON WINDOW SCHEDULE. |
| | B)REVISE ALL NOTES SHOWN ON FLOOR PLAN & |
| | ROOF FRAMING PLAN. WOOD GIRDER WAS |
| | CHANGED TO CONCRETE BEAM. SPECIFY |
| | CORRECT ANCHOR AND DELETE NOTES THAT |
| | ARE NO APPROPRIATE. SEC. 104.2.1.2 |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2001. |
| | |
| | 6-SHEET #3: CLARIFY NOTE THAT READS: |
| | "UPLIFT FOR EACH TRUSS ARE MORE THAN |
| | THE MAXIMUM VALUE SHOWN FOR THE |
| | CONNECTOR SELECTED".SEC. 104.2.1.2 |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2001. |
