| Date |
Text |
| 2004-06-16 00:00:00 | ************ UNSAT 3 TIME *********** |
| | |
| | PLEASE SEE NOTES FROM PREVIOUS TWO |
| | REVIEWS. |
| | |
| | 1)NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT LOAD CALCUALTIONS |
| | TO MEET 2002 NEC.ART 220 |
| | PLEASE SEE ADDTIONAL LOADS BEING ADDED |
| | TO EXISTING DO NOT FALL UNDER THE SAME |
| | LOAD CALCULATIONS AS NEW. |
| | PLEASE SEE 220.31B. PLEASE SEE LOADS |
| | ON PLANS/PANELS DO NOT MEET 220. |
| | |
| | 2)NOTE: PLEASE SEE NOTE #9, THIS STILL |
| | SHOWS SD'S TO BE WIRED AHEAD OF SWITCH- |
| | -ING ON BATH AND KIT LIGHTING CIRCUIT, |
| | AND BEDRMSD TO BE ARC FAULT.? |
| | PLEASE SEE ALL SD'S ARE REQUIRED TO BE |
| | WIRED IN-LINE W/ EACH OTHER. IF SD'S IN |
| | BEDROOMS ARE REQUIRED TO BE ARC FAULT |
| | PROTECTED, THIS WOULD BE THAT ENTIRE |
| | BRANCH CIRCUIT. NOT JUST THAT SD. |
| | |
| | 3)NOTE: PLEASE SEE NOTICE WAS GIVEN TO |
| | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL ON PREVIOUS REVIEW |
| | PERTAINING TO FS 553.80(2)(B). |
| | WHICH REQUIRES: " THE LOCAL GOVERMENT |
| | SHALL IMPOSE, EACH TIME AFTER THE THIRD |
| | SUCH REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED FOR |
| | THAT CODE VIOLATION A FEE OF FOUR TIMES |
| | THE AMOUNT OF THE PORTION OF THE PERMIT |
| | FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLAN REVIEW". |
| | PLEASE SEE ATTACHED BZ 242709 $1,227.98 |
| | THIS FEE MUST BE PAID BEFORE PLANS MAY |
| | BE RESUBMITTED FOR REVIEW. |
| | ONE SET OF ELECTRICAL PLANS ARE BEING |
| | RETAINED FOR FILE. |
| | |
| | PLEASE SEE THESE NOTES MUST BE ADDRESSED |
| | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS,PLEASE CALL. |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
