| Date |
Text |
| 2004-02-12 00:00:00 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | *******DENIED******* |
| | ROBERT BROWN(561) 805 6716 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001 |
| | FBC*= FLORIDA BUILD'G CODE (CITY AMEND) |
| | |
| | A) MODIFIED BITUMEN ROOF SYSTEM. PAGE 15 |
| | OF THE SUBMITTED MIAMI-DADE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL NOA# 01-0524.13 STATES THAT THE |
| | MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURE IS -45 PSF AND |
| | REFERS TO GENERAL LIMITATION #9 |
| | (PAGE 23) WHICH DOES NOT PERMIT RATIONAL |
| | ANALYSIS OR EXTRAPOLATION FOR ENHANCED |
| | FASTENINGS AT PERIMETERS AND CORNERS. |
| | THE UPLIFT PRESSURES ON THE ROOF FRAMING |
| | PLAN (SHEET S-2.0) EXCEED THE MAX DESIGN |
| | PRESSURE.SUBMIT A PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR |
| | A ROOFING SYSTEM WITH SUFFICIENT UPLIFT |
| | CAPACITY.NOTE THAT THE ROOFING SYSTEM |
| | IS REQUIRED BE CLASS A OR B AS THE |
| | BUILDING IS IN THE FIRE DISTRICT. |
| | |
| | B) BARREL ALHAMBRA CLAY TILE.FROM THE |
| | SUBMITTED MIAMI-DADE PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | NOA# 02-0603.04 IT IS NOTED THAT THE |
| | PROPOSED TILE REQUIRES ADHESIVE SET OR |
| | MORTAR SET ATTACHMENT.THEREFOR THE |
| | UNDERLAYMENT WILL BE REQUIRED TO RESIST |
| | THE UPLIFT PRESSURES STATED ON THE ROOF |
| | FRAMING PLAN (SHEET S-2.0).SEE COMMENT |
| | (A) ABOVE. |
| | |
| | C) ALUMINUM STOREFRONT.THE SUBMITTED |
| | MIAMI-DADE PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | NOA# 02-1011.03 AND 02-1011.04 WERE |
| | MISSING DRAWING SHEETS 1 TO 8 AND 1 TO 6 |
| | RESPECTIVELY, THESE HAVE BEEN PRINTED |
| | FROM THE MIAMI-DADE WEBSITE AT |
| | WWW.MIAMIDADE.GOV/BUILDINGCODE/PC-SEARCH |
| | _APP.ASP AND INSERTED.BY REFERING TO |
| | DRAWING SHEET 1 IT IS NOTED THAT THE |
| | ROUGH OPENING HEIGHTS AT DOOR TYPES I, |
| | IV, V AND VI ALL EXCEED THE MAXIMUM |
| | HEIGHT ALLOWED BY THE PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | ALSO, THE WIDTHS OF WINDOW TYPES B, C, |
| | D AND E ALL EXCEED THE MAXIMUM WIDTH |
| | (VERTICAL MULLION SPACING) ALLOWED BY |
| | THE PRODUCT APPROVAL.SUBMIT A PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL FOR A STOREFRONT/FIXED WINDOW |
| | SYSTEM THAT IS APPLICABLE TO THE OPENING |
| | SIZES PROPOSED. |
| | |
| | D) HOLLOW METAL DOORS AND FRAMES.THE |
| | DOCUMENT SUBMITTED FOR PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | APPEARS TO BE A CECO DOOR PRODUCTS |
| | DOCUMENT BEING USED TO CERTIFY DOORS |
| | MANUFACTURED BY CECO DOOR PRODUCTS. |
| | FL. ADMIN CODE RULE 9B-72 REQUIRES THAT |
| | AN APPLICATION FOR PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | INCLUDE THE NAME, ADDRESS, REPORTS AND |
| | REPORT NUMBERS OF THE TESTING ENTITY, |
| | THE EVALUATION ENTITY OR THE |
| | CERTIFICATION ENTITY.THAT INFORMATION/ |
| | DOCUMENTATION HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | |
| | THE PRODUCT APPROVAL SHEETS SHALL BE |
| | MARKED, AS APPROPRIATE, TO IDENTIFY |
| | WHICH PRODUCT OPTIONS/MATERIALS/SIZES |
| | ARE TO BE USED. |
| | |
| | FOR PRODUCTS WHICH DO NOT HAVE STATEWIDE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL, LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | CAN BE ACHIEVED IF THERE IS A QUALITY |
| | ASSURANCE PROGRAM IN PLACE WITH A STATE |
| | APPROVED QUALITY ASSURANCE ENTITY.IF |
| | NEITHER IS APPLICABLE, THEN SITE |
| | SPECIFIC APPROVAL IS REQUIRED.LOCAL |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL WILL ALLOW A PRODUCT TO |
| | BE USED, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TEST |
| | CRITERIA, THROUGHT THE JURISDICTION OF |
| | WEST PALM BEACH.SITE SPECIFIC PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL WILL ALLOW A PRODUCT TO BE |
| | USED ONLY ON THE PROJECT FOR WHICH THAT |
| | SITE SPECIFIC APPROVAL IS GRANTED. |
| | LOCAL AND SITE SPECIFIC PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | APPLICATION FORMS ARE AVAILABLE FROM |
| | THIS OFFICE.APPROVED QUALITY ASSURANCE |
| | ENTITIES ARE LISTED ON THE DCA WEBSITE: |
| | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG/COMMON/C_ORG_ |
| | REGI_SRCH.ASP |
| | |
| | |
| | **QUOTE PERMIT# ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE** |
| | |
| | END OF REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | THE CODE REFERENCES GIVE ADDITIONAL INFO |
| | TELEPHONE: (561) 805 6716ROBERT BROWN |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
