| Date |
Text |
| 2004-04-28 00:00:00 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | *******DENIED******* |
| | ROBERT BROWN(561) 805 6716 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001 |
| | FBC*= FLORIDA BUILD'G CODE (CITY AMEND) |
| | |
| | FOR CONSISTENCY, THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS |
| | ARE NUMBERED AS PER THE BUILDING PLAN |
| | REVIEW OF 12/11/03: |
| | |
| | 3) FBC 13-103ENERGY CODE COMPLIANCE |
| | (A) FBC 13-103.1.1.1IT IS NOTED THAT |
| | THE MECHANICAL ENGINEER HAS SIGNED |
| | SHEET 2 OF THE SUBMITTED ENERGY CODE |
| | COMPLIANCE FORMS.THE PROFESSIONALS |
| | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN OF THE |
| | BUILDING SHELL AND THE ELECTRICAL, |
| | LIGHTING AND PLUMBING SYSTEMS SHALL EACH |
| | SIGN SHEET 2 OF THE ENERGY CODE CODE |
| | COMPLIANCE FORM, IN THE SPACE PROVIDED, |
| | TO CERTIFY COMPLIANCE. |
| | (B) FBC 13-103.1.2BEFORE A BUILDING |
| | PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED, THE SUBMITTED |
| | ENERGY CODE COMPLIANCE FORMS SHALL BE |
| | SIGNED BY THE BUILDING OWNER, THE |
| | OWNER'S ARCHITECT OR OTHER AUTHORIZED |
| | AGENT LEGALLY DESIGNATED BY THE OWNER. |
| | |
| | 4) PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE PROPOSED |
| | SPANISH 'S' TILE AND BUILT-UP ROOFING. |
| | THE RESPONSE REFERING TO NOTE 1 ON |
| | SHEET G-2 IS NOTED.PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | MUST BE SUBMITTED BEFORE A PERMIT CAN BE |
| | ISSUED. |
| | NOTE: FL. ADMIN CODE RULE 9B-72 (IN |
| | EFFECT SINCE OCTOBER 1, 2003) REQUIRES |
| | THAT PRODUCTS HAVE STATEWIDE, LOCAL OR |
| | SITE-SPECIFIC PRODUCT APPROVAL.THE |
| | SUBMITTAL SHOULD INCLUDE THE STATEWIDE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBER (FL###), |
| | AVAILABLE FROM THE DEPT OF COMMUNITY |
| | AFFAIRS PRODUCT APPROVAL WEBSITE |
| | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG/PR/PR_SRCH.ASP |
| | |
| | |
| | 4) PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE PROPOSED |
| | WINDOWS, GLASS BLOCK, EXTERIOR DOORS AND |
| | SIDELITES, HURRICANE SHUTTERS AND ROLL- |
| | UP DOORS.THE RESPONSE REFERING TO |
| | NOTE 1 ON SHEET G-2 IS NOTED.PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS MUST BE SUBMITTED BEFORE A |
| | PERMIT CAN ISSUED. |
| | NOTE: FL. ADMIN CODE RULE 9B-72 (IN |
| | EFFECT SINCE OCTOBER 1, 2003) REQUIRES |
| | THAT PRODUCTS HAVE STATEWIDE, LOCAL OR |
| | SITE-SPECIFIC PRODUCT APPROVAL.THE |
| | SUBMITTAL SHOULD INCLUDE THE STATEWIDE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBER (FL###), |
| | AVAILABLE FROM THE DEPT OF COMMUNITY |
| | AFFAIRS PRODUCT APPROVAL WEBSITE |
| | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG/PR/PR_SRCH.ASP |
| | |
| | 6) SHEET A6.1AMEND THE WINDOW SCHEDULE |
| | TO STATE WINDOW TYPE AS FIXED, CASEMENT |
| | ETC SO THAT THE APPLICABILITY OF THE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS (SEE COMMENT #4) CAN |
| | BE VERIFIED WHEN THEY ARE SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | 13) SHEET S-2, ROOF FRAMING PLAN.THE |
| | SPECIFIED ANCHOR TYPE FOR THE MONOSLOPE |
| | ROOF IS TYPE J.THE TRUSS TIE DOWN |
| | SCHEDULE, ON SHEET S-3, STATES THE |
| | REFERENCE AS LUS26, WITH AN UPLIFT |
| | CAPACITY OF 1140#.THIS DOES NOT |
| | REFLECT THE 930# CAPACITY STATED IN THE |
| | 2004 SIMPSON CATALOG.NEITHER CAPACITY |
| | IS SUFFICIENT FOR THE EXPECTED UPLIFT ON |
| | THE MONOSLOPE ROOF TRUSS.SPECIFY |
| | ALTERNATIVE ANCHORS AND CORRECT THE |
| | CAPACITY STATED ON THE SCHEDULE. |
| | |
| | 15) THE REVISIONS MADE SINCE THE LAST |
| | REVIEW HAVE NOT BEEN HIGHLIGHTED BY |
| | REVISION CLOUDS/MARKERS AND ONE COPY OF |
| | THE OLD PLANS WAS NOT SUBMITTED.AS A |
| | RESULT THE PLANS HAVE BEEN SUBJECT TO |
| | ANOTHER FULL REVIEW, SEE COMMENTS |
| | NUMBERED 16 AND UP. |
| | NOTE:TO EXPEDITE REVIEW OF A RESUBMITTAL |
| | WHICH REQUIRES NEW PLANS IN ORDER TO |
| | ADDRESS THE ABOVE COMMENTS, THE OLD |
| | SHEETS SHALL BE REMOVED AND THE NEW |
| | SHEETS INSERTED.ONE COPY OF EACH OLD |
| | SHEET SHOULD BE STAPLED/CLIPPED TO THE |
| | REMAINING OLD SHEETS FOR COMPARISON OF |
| | REVISIONS WHEN REVIEWING THE RESUBMITTED |
| | PLANS. |
| | |
| | COMMENTS RESULTING FROM SECOND FULL |
| | REVIEW OF PLANS PER COMMENT 15: |
| | |
| | 16) FBC 11-4.8.2RAMP.SHEET A2.1 DOES |
| | NOT CLEARLY SHOW THE EXTENT OF THE RAMP |
| | FROM THE FOUNTAIN UP TO THE ENTRY TOWER |
| | AND THERE IS NO CROSS-SECTION SHOWING |
| | THE CHANGE IN LEVEL.AMEND THE PLANS TO |
| | PROVIDE THIS INFORMATION AND DEMONSTRATE |
| | PROVISION OF THE REQUIRED HANDRAILS AND |
| | A COMPLIANT RAMP SLOPE OF 1 IN 12 (OR |
| | BETTER). |
| | |
| | 17) FBC 1608.2.1ALL HANDRAILS SHALL BE |
| | DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED FOR A |
| | CONCENTRATED LOAD OF 200 LB AND A LINE |
| | LOAD OF 50 PLF.THESE LOADS SHALL NOT |
| | BE APPLIED SIMULTANEOUSLY BUT SHALL BE |
| | APPLIED INDIVIDUALLY AT ANY POINT, AND |
| | IN ANY DIRECTION, TO PRODUCE MAXIMUM |
| | STRESS IN EACH OF THE COMPONENTS OR |
| | SUPPORTS.AMEND/ANNOTATE THE PLANS. |
| | SEE ALSO FIRE PLAN REVIEW COMMENT. |
| | |
| | 18) FBC 705.1.3GENERATOR ROOM DOOR. |
| | DOOR 147A IS IN A 2-HR FIRE-RATED WALL |
| | BUT IS NOT SHOWN AS RATED ON THE DOOR |
| | SCHEDULE (SHEET A6.1).AMEND THE DOOR |
| | SCHEDULE. |
| | |
| | 19) BOUNDARY SURVEY SHT FP1977 (1 OF 2). |
| | THE PROPOSED BUILDING STRUCTURE |
| | TRANSGRESSES LEGAL BOUNDARY LINES |
| | BETWEEN THE LOTS WHICH COMBINE TO FORM |
| | 'THE SITE'.SUBMIT A COPY OF THE 'UNITY |
| | OF TITLE' DOCUMENT SO THAT FBC TABLE 600 |
| | BOUNDARY LINE REQUIREMENTS MAY BE DEEMED |
| | NOT APPLICABLE. |
| | |
| | **QUOTE PERMIT# ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE** |
| | |
| | END OF REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | THE CODE REFERENCES GIVE ADDITIONAL INFO |
| | TELEPHONE: (561) 805 6716ROBERT BROWN |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
