| Date |
Text |
| 2004-04-23 00:00:00 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | REVISION & PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | 1.)REVISED SHEETS ADDRESSING PROVISOS |
| | #1 AND 2 WERE REVIEWED, FOUND TO |
| | BE CODE COMPLIANT AND STAMPED. |
| | |
| | 2.)SEPARATE PERMIT FOR SHUTTERS. |
| | |
| | 3.)THE PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE |
| | CONNECTORS ARE DIFFICULT TO REVIEW. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A LIST OF THE CONNECTORS |
| | USED AND PROVIDE STATEWIDE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL FOR THOSE CONNECTORS. |
| | |
| | 4.)SEE THE PREVIOUS LIST IN REGARDS |
| | TO THE ENGINEER'S COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | FAC61G15-23.002.ALTHOUGH HE ADDED THIS |
| | INFORMATION TO THE SHEETS AS REQUESTED, |
| | OTHER DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED |
| | WHICH ARE NOT IN COMPLIANCE.THIS IS |
| | A REQUIREMENT FOR DOCUMENTS PREPARED |
| | BY AN ENGINEER.THIS APPLIES TO THE |
| | RESPONSE TO PREVIOUS COMMENT #3, THE |
| | ALTERNATE FASTENER CALCULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 5.)SITE SPECIFIC PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | WERE SUBMITTED FOR THE ROYALL WALL |
| | PRODUCT.THE PAPERWORK WAS NOT IN |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH FAC9B-72.HOWEVER, MY |
| | UNDERSTANDING IS THAT THIS PRODUCT CAN |
| | BE APPROVED UNDER FBC103.7.ADDRESS. |
| | |
| | 6.)ADDITIONAL FEES DUE. |
