| Date |
Text |
| 2004-04-23 00:00:00 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | 1.)RF1 AND THE MECHANICAL PAGE HAVE |
| | BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE AND |
| | STAMPED. |
| | |
| | 2.)IT IS UNCLEAR WHAT THE CHANGES |
| | ARE ON THE OTHER SHEETS SUBMITTED.ALL |
| | CHANGES ARE TO BE CLEARLY INDICATED |
| | WITH CLOUDS OR TRIANGLES.A NEW |
| | REVISION DATE IS GIVEN BUT I CAN'T |
| | LOCATE THE CHANGES. |
| | |
| | 3.)SEPARATE PERMIT FOR SHUTTERS. |
| | |
| | 4.)THE PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE |
| | CONNECTORS ARE DIFFICULT TO REVIEW. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A LIST OF THE CONNECTORS |
| | USED AND PROVIDE STATEWIDE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL FOR THOSE CONNECTORS. |
| | |
| | 5.)THE CALCS SUBMITTED ARE LACKING |
| | THE INFORMATION REQUIRED BY FAC61G15- |
| | 23.002. |
| | |
| | 6.)SITE SPECIFIC PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | APPLICATION WAS SUBMITTED FOR THE ROYALL |
| | WALL PRODUCT.THE PAPERWORK WAS NOT IN |
| | COMPLIANCE FAC9B-72.HOWEVER, MY |
| | UNDERSTANDING IS THAT THIS PRODUCT CAN |
| | BE APPROVED UNDER FBC103.7.ADDRESS. |
| | |
| | 7.)ADDITIONAL FEES DUE.IF THE |
| | OTHER REVISED SHEETS ARE RESUBMITTED, |
| | THIS IS A REVISION, NOT A SUBMITTAL. |
