| Date |
Text |
| 2004-01-16 00:00:00 | SECOND CHECKLIST |
| | ARCHITECTUAL PLANS DATED 12/22/03 AND |
| | STRUCTURAL PLANS DATED 12/19/03. |
| | |
| | THE PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED SURVEY AND SITE |
| | PLAN HAVE NOT BEEN PROVIDED.SHEET 2.1 |
| | TITLED SITE PLAN, DOES NOT HAVE ANY |
| | HORIZONTAL CONTROL DIMENSIONS TO LOCATE |
| | THE BUILDING OR ANYTHING ELSE ON THE |
| | PROPERTY.PROPERTY LINES ARE NOT |
| | IDENTIFIED. SECTION 2, ON SHEET 2.1 |
| | SHOWS A SITE WALL DETAIL WITH THE NOTE |
| | THAT THE FF ELEV.IS 27.25' NGVD.IS |
| | THIS OF RELEVANCE TO THE SITE WALL? |
| | |
| | 2THE ARCHITECT'S RESPONSE LETTER |
| | DATED 12/22/03 STATES THAT A "FIRE |
| | RISERSCHEMATIC" CAN BE FOUND ON REVISED |
| | SHEET ME2. SHEET ME2 DATED 12/19/03 |
| | FROMCHANE, INC. HAS NO FIRE SPRINKLER |
| | DESIGN INFORMATION ON IT. |
| | |
| | 3RESPONSE #3 OF THE ARCHITECT'S |
| | LETTERSTATES THAT THE ATTIC SPACE WILL |
| | HOUSE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, SEE SHEET |
| | M1 NOTE 5A FOR GRAVITY LOADS.SHEETS |
| | M1 AND M2 ARE BEREFT OF ANY NOTES. |
| | |
| | 4ARCHITECTS RESPONSE #5 RE: THE |
| | OUTDATED CODE STANDARDS TO REFER TO |
| | REVISED SHEET S3.THE S3 SHEET STILL |
| | CONTAINS ERRONEOUS AND OUTDATED |
| | INFORMATION.IT IS PARTICULARLY |
| | TROUBLESOME TO ME THAT A PROFESSIONAL |
| | ENGINEER USES AN OUDATED PRESCRIPTIVE |
| | RESIDENTIAL DESIGN FOR A COMMERCIAL |
| | BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 5THE PREVIOUS REQUEST FOR HIGH LIFT |
| | GROUTING HAS NOT BEEN ADDRESSED.SHEET |
| | S3 REFERS TO SPECIFICATIONS THAT WERE |
| | NOT FOUND. |
| | |
| | 6COLUMNS SHOWN AS MC1 ARE NOT IN THE |
| | COLUMN SCHEDULE ON SHEET S3.IS THE |
| | 12/22/03 LETTER FROM THE ARCHITECT |
| | INTENDED TO BE MADE A PART OF THE |
| | PERMIT PLANS SINCE THOSE RESPONSES HAVE |
| | SOME OF THE INFORMATION THAT IS ABSENT |
| | FROM THE PLANS? |
| | |
| | 7THE REQUESTED COLUMN CONNECTIONS FOR |
| | THE TS COLUMNS SHOWN ON SHEETS S1 AND |
| | S2 HAVENOT BEEN PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 8SHEET S3 ROOF WIND ZONE SKETCH.DID |
| | THE ENGINEER USE THE SIMPLIFIED METHOD |
| | IN ASCE 7-98 SECTION 6.4 OR THE |
| | ANALYTICAL METHOD IN SECTION 6.5?IN |
| | EITHER CASE, HOW WERE EDGE AREAS OF 4' |
| | AND 5' DETERMINED FOR A BUILDING WITH A |
| | LEAST DIMENSION OF 73' AND A MEAN ROOF |
| | HEIGHT OF 16.5'?WHERE ARE ZONES 4&5? |
| | |
| | 9SEE FBC 13-400.3 FOR COMPUTER BASED |
| | ENERGY CALCULATIONS AND THE ATTENDANT |
| | METHODS TO BE USED.ALSO, THE 6020 SF |
| | GROSS AREA INPUT DOES NOT AGREE WITH |
| | THE PLANS' 6700 + SQUARE FEET |
| | CONDITIONED AREA.PLEASE REVISE AS |
| | NECESSARY. |
| | |
| | 10THE IMPACT FEES AND NOA'S CALLED OUT |
| | IN THE FIRST CHECKLIST REMAIN |
| | APPLICABLE. |
