| Date |
Text |
| 2004-04-12 00:00:00 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | 1.)ONE MEANS OF ESCAPE DURING A |
| | HURRICANE IS TO BE PROVIDED, FBC1005.4.5 |
| | THIS MEANS OF ESCAPE CANNOT BE THROUGH |
| | A GARAGE.BASED ON A CONVERSATION WITH |
| | THE CONTRACTOR, ALL EXTERIOR DOORS ARE |
| | BEING REPLACE WITH GLAZED DOORS |
| | REQUIRING IMPACT PROTECTION. |
| | |
| | 2.)THE PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED |
| | DOES NOT INCLUDE THE SIDELITES OR |
| | MULLIONS.THE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE |
| | OUTSWING DOOR IS LIMITED TO 100 SQ IN |
| | OF LEXAN (NOT A FULLY GLAZED DOOR), AND |
| | SIDELITES AND MULLIONS ARE NOT A PART |
| | OF THE APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 3.)IN MY CONVERSATION WITH JAY |
| | LAWRENCE, HE INDICATED THAT THE DOORS |
| | ARRIVE WITHOUT GLASS AND WILL BE GLAZED |
| | ON SITE.THIS DESCRIPTION DOES NOT |
| | MATCH THE PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | 4.)THE PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE |
| | ILLEGIBLE.ALSO, TWO COPIES ARE NEEDED |
| | OF THE SAME PRODUCT APPROVAL.ONE WAS |
| | FOR INSWING, ONE WAS OUTSWING.THE |
| | PLAN SHOWS OUTSWING ONLY.THE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS ARE TO BE LEGIBLE AND ON |
| | GOOD QUALITY PAPER.ONE WAS SUBMITTED |
| | ON THERMAL FAX PAPER. |
| | |
| | 5.)FYI, THE INSWING DOOR IS NOT FOR |
| | USE WHERE WATER INFILTRATION |
| | REQUIREMENTS ARE NEEDED.HOWEVER, |
| | APPARENTLY THIS PRODUCT APPROVAL WAS |
| | SUBMITTED IN ERROR. |
| | |
| | 6.)HAVE THE PRODUCTS APPROVED BY |
| | HISTORIC BEFORE RESUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | 7.)AS DISCUSSED, THE PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | FOR THE WINDOWS WILL BE VOIDED AS NO |
| | WINDOWS ARE BEING REPLACED. |
