| Date |
Text |
| 2003-11-03 00:00:00 | THE SURVEY DOES NOT AGREE WITH THE SITE |
| | PLAN ON THE SOUTH ELEVATION. |
| | |
| | SHEET A2 DOES NOT HAVE INFORMATION FOR |
| | THE 2-2X6 TO SUPPORT THE H-7 TRUSS LIKE |
| | GRADE, SPECIES, LAP LENGHT OR FASTENING |
| | METHODS. |
| | |
| | THE NEW 24"X24" FOOTING DOES NOT A |
| | LENGTH MEASUREMENT, MINIMUM SOIL |
| | BEARING VALUE OR DEPTH BELOW GRADE. |
| | |
| | WHAT WILL BE DOWELED TO THE EXISTING |
| | FOOTER BETWEEN THE DINING ROOM AND |
| | KITCHEN. |
| | |
| | THE ROOM DIMENSIONS DO NOT DEFINE THE |
| | NEW CONSTRUCTION TO THE EXISTING. |
| | |
| | THE 18'X5' PORCH DOES NOT HAVE |
| | DIMENSIONS TO LOCATE THE FOOTING PIERS. |
| | |
| | THERE ARE NO DETAILS FOR THE |
| | CONSTRUCTION OF THE BREAKFAST ROOM WALL |
| | @ THE 45 DEEGREE ANGLE. |
| | |
| | THE TYPICAL HEADER DETAIL DOES NOT SHOW |
| | A CONTINUOUS LOAD PATH TO THE |
| | FOUNDATION. |
| | |
| | THERE ARE NO FRAMING PLANS FOR THE |
| | SECOND FLOOR. |
| | |
| | THE DELEGATION OF TRUSS DESIGN IS NOT |
| | SHOWN OR LOADS SPECIFIED. |
| | |
| | THERE IS STILLNO INFORMATION FOR THE |
| | CONNECTION OF THE TRUSSES TO THE |
| | EXISTING ROOF OR THE REQUESTED |
| | COMPUTATIONS TO DEMONSTRATE THE |
| | CAPABILITY OF THE EXITING CONSTRUCTION. |
| | TAX RECORDS INDICATE THIS HOUSE WAS |
| | CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO 1940. |
| | |
| | IN SECTION CC, WHAT WILL THE HEAD ROOM |
| | BE ON THE SECOND FLOOR BALCONY? |
