| Date |
Text |
| 2004-02-28 00:00:00 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 |
| | |
| | 1.)PROVIDE A SURVEY FOR THIS PARCEL. |
| | |
| | 2.)PROVIDE A DIMENSIONED SITE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 3.)ZONING APPROVAL REQUIRED BEFORE |
| | PERMIT ISSUANCE. |
| | |
| | 4.)THE WINDOW SIZES EXCEED THE MAXIMUM |
| | SIZE ALLOWED BY THE SBCCI TEST REPORTS, |
| | WHICH IS APPARENTLY WHY ENGINEERING FOR |
| | THE WINDOWS WAS SUBMITTED.HOWEVER, ANY |
| | ENGINEERING SUBMITTED IN LIEU OF TEST |
| | REPORTS MUST BE ORIGINAL AND SEALED IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH FS471.025, WITH |
| | THE INFORMATION REQUIRED TO BE ON EACH |
| | SHEET AS PER FAC61G-23.002.ALSO, THE |
| | SITE SPECIFIC PAPERWORK INDICATES A |
| | LIMITATION OF +30/-30 FOR DESIGN |
| | PRESSURE; SEE SHEET A-DT1 FOR DESIGN |
| | LOAD REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | 5.)THE PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED FOR |
| | THE IMPACT FRENCH DOORS ARE FOR SMALL |
| | MISSILE IMPACT ONLY.SHUTTERS WOULD |
| | BE REQUIRED BELOW 30'.IMPACT |
| | PROTECTION IS TO BE FOR LARGE MISSILE |
| | IMPACT, FBC1606.1.4(1). |
| | |
| | 6.)SITE SPECIFIC PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE |
| | TO BE SEALED IN TWO PLACES; ENGINEER AND |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD. |
| | |
| | 7.)FOR THE NON-IMPACT FRENCH DOOR, |
| | CLEARLY INDICATE ON DRAWING W03-38 WHICH |
| | DESIGN YOU ARE USING AS NOT ALL MEET |
| | DESIGN LOAD REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | 8.)SHEET 3 PREPARED BY AL-FAROOQ |
| | CORPORATION FOR THE WINDOWS INDICATES |
| | THAT 1ST & 2ND FLOOR WILL HAVE NON- |
| | IMPACT WINDOWS.IMPACT REQUIRED ON THE |
| | 2ND FLOOR AS PER YOUR APPROVED PLAN. |
| | ALSO APPLIES TO SHEETS 7, 11. |
| | |
| | 9.)SHEET 4 IS FOR A SINGLE HUNG WINDOW |
| | BUT INDICATES THAT IT IS FOR MARK C, |
| | WHICH IS A FIXED WINDOW.NOTE THAT THIS |
| | WINDOW DOES NOT REQUIRE ENGINEERING AS |
| | IT IS COVERED UNDER THE SUBMITTED |
| | SBCCI TEST REPORT. (AL-FAROOQ) |
| | |
| | 10.)SHEET 5 INDICATES THAT IMPACT IS |
| | FOR THE 3RD FLOOR, PLEASE NOTE THAT IT |
| | SHOULD BE FOR 2ND AND 3RD FLOOR (AL- |
| | FAROOQ).ALSO APPLIES TO SHEETS 9. |
| | |
| | 11.)SHEET 12, MAX DESIGN PRESSURE IS |
| | -44.5 FOR THE HORIZONTAL ROLLER, NON- |
| | IMPACT.THIS DOES NOT MEET DESIGN |
| | PRESSURE REQUIREMENTS FOR ZONE 5.THE |
| | COVER SHEET INDICATES THAT ALL WINDOWS |
| | USE WORST CASE ZONE 5 (NOTE 4). ADDRESS. |
| | |
| | 12.)SHEET 12 SHOWS A HORIZONTAL ROLLER |
| | WINDOW SIZE OF 72X54, THE CALCS ON |
| | SHEET 13 ARE FOR THIS SIZE, BUT THE PLAN |
| | SHOWS A SIZE OF 74X62.ALSO APPLIES TO |
| | SHEET 14 (IMPACT HORIZ.ROLLER). ADDRESS. |
| | |
| | 13.)PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTAL FORM |
| | FOR THE SINGLE HUNG WINDOW SHOWS A |
| | DESIGN PRESSURE OF +/- 950.IS THIS |
| | CORRECT? |
| | |
| | 14.)ON THE SBCCI REPORT FOR THE |
| | SHUTTERS CLEARLY INDICATE THE PRODUCT |
| | TO BE INSTALLED AND CIRCLE ANCHORING |
| | TO BE USED.NOT ALL PRODUCTS MEET |
| | MINIMUM DESIGN CRITERIA. |
| | |
| | 15.)PANELMATE ANCHORS ARE INDICATED ON |
| | THE SHUTTER INSTALLATION SCHEDULE AND |
| | 21-ADT5.THIS ANCHOR IS FOR CONCRETE/ |
| | HOLLOW BLOCK INSTALLATIONS, SEE TEST |
| | REPORT. |
| | |
| | 16.)PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE LOUVERED |
| | DOORS WERE NOT SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | 17.)JAMERCO DATA (MISC HARDWARE |
| | SECTION OF THE PRODUCT APPROVAL BOOK) |
| | IS ILLEGIBLE.THE PLAN NOTES JAMERCO |
| | .143"X 1 1/2" PINS, BUT THE SEMCO |
| | CONNECTORS WERE TESTED WITH .145" |
| | POWER FASTENERS.SUBMIT LEGIBLE |
| | PAPERWORK AND HAVE THE ENGINEER |
| | ADDRESS. |
| | |
| | 18.)SUBMIT REVISED PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | PAPERWORK FOR THE OTHER BUILDINGS IF |
| | NECESSARY. |
